RELAP5-3D validation studies based on the High Temperature Test facility

被引:0
|
作者
Kile, Robert F. [1 ,2 ]
Epiney, Aaron S. [2 ]
Brown, Nicholas R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] Idaho Natl Lab, Idaho Falls, ID USA
关键词
Gas-cooled reactor; Thermal hydraulics; Benchmark; Reactor safety; HTTF; Validation; RELAP5-3D; HTTR; BENCHMARK;
D O I
10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113401
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
In the spring and summer of 2019, experiments were conducted at the High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF) that form the basis of an upcoming high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) thermal hydraulics (T/H) benchmark. HTTF is an integral effects test facility for HTGR T/H modeling validation. This paper presents RELAP5-3D models of two of those experiments: PG-27, a pressurized conduction cooldown (PCC); and PG-29, a depressurized conduction cooldown (DCC). These models used the RELAP5-3D model of HTTF originally developed by Paul Bayless as a starting point. The sensitivity analysis and uncertainty quantification code, RAVEN was used to perform calibration studies for the steady-state portion of PG-27. We developed four PG-27 calibrations based on steady-state conditions. These calibrations all used an effective thermal conductivity equal to 36 % of the measured thermal conductivity, but they differed with respect to the frictional pressure drops and radial conduction models. These models all captured the trends in steady-state temperature distributions and transient temperature behavior well. All four calibrations show room for improvement in predicting the transient temperature rise. The smallest error in temperature rise during the transient was a 21 % underprediction, and the largest was a 48 % underprediction. The errors in transient temperature rise are largely a result of a mismatch in power density between the RELAP5-3D model and the experiment due to the location of active heater rods along the boundary between heat structures in the model. The best of these calibrations was applied to PG-29 to model the DCC. Once again, temperatures during the transient were underpredicted but trends in temperature were captured. The RELAP5-3D model captured trends in the data but could not reproduce measured temperatures exactly. This result is not attributed to deficiencies in the experimental data or to RELAP5-3D itself. Rather, this result likely arises due to the some of the assumptions and decisions made when the RELAP5-3D model was first developed, prior to the execution of HTTF experiments. An agreement in prediction of temperature trends but challenges reproducing HTTF temperatures within measurement uncertainty is consistent with previous analyses of HTTF in the literature. Future RELAP5-3D validation activities centered around HTTF may be able to provide greater insight into the code's capabilities for HTGR modeling with a more finely nodalized model.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] REACTOR CAVITY COOLING SYSTEM FACILITY SHAKEDOWN AND RELAP5-3D MODEL VALIDATION
    Vaghetto, R.
    Lee, Saya
    Hassan, Y. A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND THE ASME 2012 POWER CONFERENCE - 2012, VOL 3, 2012, : 775 - 782
  • [2] INVESTIGATIONS ON RELAP5-3D TO RELAP5-3D COUPLING METHODOLOGY BY PVMEXEC
    Parrinello, Valeria
    Lanfredini, Marco
    Petruzzi, Alessandro
    Cherubini, Marco
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING, 2016, VOL 3, 2016,
  • [3] RELAP5-3D User Tools
    Forsmann, J. Hope
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 193 (01) : 213 - 217
  • [4] ENHANCED VERIFICATION FOR RELAP5-3D PARAMETER AND SENSITIVITY STUDIES
    Mesina, George L.
    Anderson, Nolan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING, 2016, VOL 3, 2016,
  • [5] PHENIX TRANSIENT ANALYSIS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF RELAP5-3D BASED ON DISSYMMETRIC TEST BENCHMARK
    Giannetti, F.
    Narcisi, V.
    Subioli, A.
    Del Nevo, A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING, 2018, VOL 6B, 2018,
  • [6] Validation of RELAP5-3D RBMK-1500 reactor model
    Uspuras, E
    Kaliatka, A
    Bubelis, E
    NUCLEAR ENERGY-JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH NUCLEAR ENERGY SOCIETY, 2004, 43 (05): : 257 - 264
  • [7] THALLIUM: An experimental facility for simulation of HCLL In-box LOCA and validation of RELAP5-3D system code
    Utili, M.
    Venturini, A.
    Lanfranchi, M.
    Calderoni, P.
    Malavasi, A.
    Zucchetti, M.
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2017, 123 : 102 - 106
  • [8] Modeling Moving Systems with RELAP5-3D
    Mesina, G. L.
    Aumiller, D. L.
    Buschman, F. X.
    Kyle, M. R.
    NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 182 (01) : 83 - 95
  • [9] RELAP5-3D Three-Dimensional Analysis Based on PHeNIX Dissymmetric Transient Test
    Narcisi, Vincenzo
    Giannetti, Fabio
    Subioli, Andrea
    Del Nevo, Alessandro
    Caruso, Gianfranco
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND RADIATION SCIENCE, 2020, 6 (01):
  • [10] Pool temperature stratification analysis in CIRCE-ICE facility with RELAP5-3D© model and comparison with experimental tests
    Narcisi, V.
    Giannetti, F.
    Tarantino, M.
    Martelli, D.
    Caruso, G.
    35TH UIT HEAT TRANSFER CONFERENCE (UIT2017), 2017, 923