Classifier selection for majority voting

被引:391
|
作者
Ruta, Dymitr [1 ]
Gabrys, Bogdan [2 ]
机构
[1] Computational Intelligence Group, BT Exact Technologies, Orion Building, pp12, Adastral Park, Martlesham Heath, Ipswich IP5 3 RE, United Kingdom
[2] Compl. Intelligence Research Group, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Fern Barrow Poole BH12 5BB, United Kingdom
关键词
Algorithms - Classification (of information) - Computational complexity - Heuristic methods - Mathematical models - Pattern recognition - Risks;
D O I
10.1016/j.inffus.2004.04.008
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Individual classification models are recently challenged by combined pattern recognition systems, which often show better performance. In such systems the optimal set of classifiers is first selected and then combined by a specific fusion method. For a small number of classifiers optimal ensembles can be found exhaustively, but the burden of exponential complexity of such search limits its practical applicability for larger systems. As a result, simpler search algorithms and/or selection criteria are needed to reduce the complexity. This work provides a revision of the classifier selection methodology and evaluates the practical applicability of diversity measures in the context of combining classifiers by majority voting. A number of search algorithms are proposed and adjusted to work properly with a number of selection criteria including majority voting error and various diversity measures. Extensive experiments carried out with 15 classifiers on 27 datasets indicate inappropriateness of diversity measures used as selection criteria in favour of the direct combiner error based search. Furthermore, the results prompted a novel design of multiple classifier systems in which selection and fusion are recurrently applied to a population of best combinations of classifiers rather than the individual best. The improvement of the generalisation performance of such system is demonstrated experimentally. © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 81
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Tag SNP selection using clonal selection and majority voting algorithms
    Ilhan, Ilhan
    Tezel, Gulay
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DATA MINING AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2016, 16 (04) : 290 - 311
  • [12] Using Weighted Majority Voting Classifier Combination for Relation Classification in Biomedical Texts
    Remya, K. R.
    Ramya, J. S.
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, INSTRUMENTATION, COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES (ICCICCT), 2014, : 1205 - 1209
  • [13] Model for measuring accuracies of majority voting of Ensemble Classifier with COB and Genetic algorithm
    Site, Sarwesh
    Mishra, Sadhna K.
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION COMMUNICATION AND EMBEDDED SYSTEMS (ICICES), 2013, : 99 - 103
  • [14] Multi-classifier majority voting analyses in provenance studies on iron artefacts
    Zabinski, Grzegorz
    Gramacki, Jaroslaw
    Gramacki, Artur
    Mista-Jakubowska, Ewelina
    Birch, Thomas
    Disser, Alexandre
    JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 113
  • [15] A Jackknife and Voting Classifier Approach to Feature Selection and Classification
    Taylor, Sandra L.
    Kim, Kyoungmi
    CANCER INFORMATICS, 2011, 10 : 133 - 147
  • [16] Optimistic Selection Rule Better Than Majority Voting System
    Sugiyama, Takuya
    Obata, Takuya
    Hoki, Kunihito
    Ito, Takeshi
    COMPUTERS AND GAMES, 2011, 6515 : 166 - +
  • [17] Multiple classifier combination for character recognition: Revisiting the majority voting system and its variations
    Rahman, AFR
    Alam, H
    Fairhurst, MC
    DOCUMENT ANALYSIS SYSTEM V, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 2423 : 167 - 178
  • [18] Majority Voting and Feature Selection Based Network Intrusion Detection System
    Patil, Dharmaraj R.
    Pattewar, Tareek M.
    EAI ENDORSED TRANSACTIONS ON SCALABLE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 9 (06):
  • [19] Logic and Majority Voting
    Takemura, Ryo
    JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC, 2022, 51 (02) : 347 - 382
  • [20] PROBLEMS OF MAJORITY VOTING
    TULLOCK, G
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1959, 67 (06) : 571 - 579