Hourly PM2.5 prediction and its comparative analysis under multi-machine learning model

被引:0
|
作者
Kang, Jun-Feng [1 ]
Huang, Lie-Xing [1 ]
Zhang, Chun-Yan [3 ]
Zeng, Zhao-Liang [2 ]
Yao, Shen-Jun [4 ]
机构
[1] School of Architecture and Surveying Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou,341000, China
[2] Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan,430079, China
[3] Chongqing Wanzhou District Planning and Design Institute, Chongqing,404000, China
[4] key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science, Ministry of Education, Shanghai,200241, China
关键词
Nearest neighbor search - Forecasting - Decision trees - Regression analysis - Meteorology - Support vector machines - Neural networks - Pollution;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Six models were built for timely and accurate estimation of PM2.5 concentration and pollution levels, namely K Nearest Neighbor (KNN) model, BP Neural Network (BPNN) model, Support Vector Machine (SVM) regression model, Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) model, XGBoost model and Random forest(RF) model. Ganzhou City of Jiangxi Province was selected as the study area. The hourly ground-based meteorological data, PM2.5 concentration data and Merra-2reanalysis data from 2017 to 2018 were used for modelling. The results show that PM2.5 concentration can also be predicted using visibility and meteorological data when pollutant observation data are missing. In terms of the prediction accuracy of PM2.5 concentration, the XGBoost model performs best, followed by the RF model, and the GPR model is the worst. The prediction accuracy of the six models was generally highest in winter, followed by autumn and spring, and lowest in summer. Compared with other models, the XGBoost model exhibits a more accurate prediction performance for PM2.5 pollution level prediction with the comprehensive accuracy rate of 87.6%. Moreover, XGBoost model has the advantages of short training and small memory consumption. Visibility (followed by the relative humidity and time variable) play a key factor in the XGBoost models for PM2.5 concentration prediction. This study can provide a reference for environmental departments to accurately predict and forecast PM2.5 concentration. © 2020, Editorial Board of China Environmental Science. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1895 / 1905
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Performing indoor PM2.5 prediction with low-cost data and machine learning
    Lagesse, Brent
    Wang, Shuoqi
    Larson, Timothy, V
    Kim, Amy Ahim
    FACILITIES, 2022, 40 (7/8) : 495 - 514
  • [42] Air quality PM2.5 prediction based on multi-model fusion
    Zhang, Bo
    Li, Xiaoli
    Zhao, Yanling
    Li, Yang
    Wang, Xinjian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 31ST CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC 2019), 2019, : 4426 - 4431
  • [43] A new hybrid prediction model of PM2.5 concentration based on secondary decomposition and optimized extreme learning machine
    Yang, Hong
    Zhao, Junlin
    Li, Guohui
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (44) : 67214 - 67241
  • [44] Prediction of PM2.5 Concentration Based on Ensemble Learning
    Peng Y.
    Zhao Z.-R.
    Wu T.-X.
    Wang J.
    Beijing Youdian Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2019, 42 (06): : 162 - 169
  • [45] A new hybrid prediction model of PM2.5 concentration based on secondary decomposition and optimized extreme learning machine
    Hong Yang
    Junlin Zhao
    Guohui Li
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 67214 - 67241
  • [46] Multiresolution Analysis of HRRR Meteorological Parameters and GOES-R AOD for Hourly PM2.5 Prediction
    Pruthi, Dimple
    Zhu, Qingyang
    Wang, Wenhao
    Liu, Yang
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 58 (45) : 20040 - 20048
  • [47] Interpreting hourly mass concentrations of PM2.5 chemical components with an optimal deep-learning model
    Li, Hongyi
    Yang, Ting
    Du, Yinhing
    Tan, Yining
    Wang, Zifa
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2024, 151 : 125 - 139
  • [48] XIS-PM2.5: A daily spatiotemporal machine-learning model for PM2.5 in the contiguous United States
    Just, Allan C.
    Arfer, Kodi B.
    Rush, Johnathan
    Lyapustin, Alexei
    Kloog, Itai
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2025, 271
  • [49] A hybrid optimization prediction model for PM2.5 based on VMD and deep learning
    Zeng, Tao
    Xu, Liping
    Liu, Yahui
    Liu, Ruru
    Luo, Yutian
    Xi, Yunyun
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 15 (07)
  • [50] PM2.5 Air Quality Index Prediction Using an Ensemble Learning Model
    Xu, Wei
    Cheng, Cheng
    Guo, Danhuai
    Chen, Xin
    Yuan, Hui
    Yang, Rui
    Liu, Yi
    WEB-AGE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT: WAIM 2014 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOPS, 2014, 8597 : 119 - 129