Hourly PM2.5 prediction and its comparative analysis under multi-machine learning model

被引:0
|
作者
Kang, Jun-Feng [1 ]
Huang, Lie-Xing [1 ]
Zhang, Chun-Yan [3 ]
Zeng, Zhao-Liang [2 ]
Yao, Shen-Jun [4 ]
机构
[1] School of Architecture and Surveying Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou,341000, China
[2] Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan,430079, China
[3] Chongqing Wanzhou District Planning and Design Institute, Chongqing,404000, China
[4] key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science, Ministry of Education, Shanghai,200241, China
关键词
Nearest neighbor search - Forecasting - Decision trees - Regression analysis - Meteorology - Support vector machines - Neural networks - Pollution;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Six models were built for timely and accurate estimation of PM2.5 concentration and pollution levels, namely K Nearest Neighbor (KNN) model, BP Neural Network (BPNN) model, Support Vector Machine (SVM) regression model, Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) model, XGBoost model and Random forest(RF) model. Ganzhou City of Jiangxi Province was selected as the study area. The hourly ground-based meteorological data, PM2.5 concentration data and Merra-2reanalysis data from 2017 to 2018 were used for modelling. The results show that PM2.5 concentration can also be predicted using visibility and meteorological data when pollutant observation data are missing. In terms of the prediction accuracy of PM2.5 concentration, the XGBoost model performs best, followed by the RF model, and the GPR model is the worst. The prediction accuracy of the six models was generally highest in winter, followed by autumn and spring, and lowest in summer. Compared with other models, the XGBoost model exhibits a more accurate prediction performance for PM2.5 pollution level prediction with the comprehensive accuracy rate of 87.6%. Moreover, XGBoost model has the advantages of short training and small memory consumption. Visibility (followed by the relative humidity and time variable) play a key factor in the XGBoost models for PM2.5 concentration prediction. This study can provide a reference for environmental departments to accurately predict and forecast PM2.5 concentration. © 2020, Editorial Board of China Environmental Science. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1895 / 1905
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] STAN Based PM2.5 Prediction Model
    Xu, Zhe
    Huo, Qingzhou
    Lv, Yi
    2019 CHINESE AUTOMATION CONGRESS (CAC2019), 2019, : 3482 - 3487
  • [32] STFformer: An Effective PM2.5 Prediction Model
    Zhang, Guangpei
    Niu, Dan
    Wang, Hongbin
    Tang, Yuanqing
    Zang, Zengliang
    Huang, Qunbo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 36TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, CCDC 2024, 2024, : 5131 - 5136
  • [33] A novel hybrid ensemble model for hourly PM2.5 concentration forecasting
    L. Zhang
    L. Xu
    M. Jiang
    P. He
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2023, 20 : 219 - 230
  • [34] Robust prediction of hourly PM2.5 from meteorological data using LightGBM
    Zhong, Junting
    Zhang, Xiaoye
    Gui, Ke
    Wang, Yaqiang
    Che, Huizheng
    Shen, Xiaojing
    Zhang, Lei
    Zhang, Yangmei
    Sun, Junying
    Zhang, Wenjie
    NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2021, 8 (10)
  • [35] A novel hybrid ensemble model for hourly PM2.5 concentration forecasting
    Zhang, L.
    Xu, L.
    Jiang, M.
    He, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 20 (01) : 219 - 230
  • [36] Robust prediction of hourly PM2.5 from meteorological data using LightGBM
    Junting Zhong
    Xiaoye Zhang
    Ke Gui
    Yaqiang Wang
    Huizheng Che
    Xiaojing Shen
    Lei Zhang
    Yangmei Zhang
    Junying Sun
    Wenjie Zhang
    NationalScienceReview, 2021, 8 (10) : 115 - 126
  • [37] Spatiotemporal change of PM2.5 concentration in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and its prediction based on machine learning
    Liu, Nanjian
    Hao, Zhixin
    Zhao, Peng
    URBAN CLIMATE, 2024, 58
  • [38] Prediction of PM2.5 and PM10 in Chiang Mai Province: A Comparison of Machine Learning Models
    Thongrod, Thitaporn
    Lim, Apiradee
    Ingviya, Thammasin
    Owusu, Benjamin Atta
    2022 37TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL CONFERENCE ON CIRCUITS/SYSTEMS, COMPUTERS AND COMMUNICATIONS (ITC-CSCC 2022), 2022, : 337 - 340
  • [39] Application of the XGBoost Machine Learning Method in PM2.5 Prediction: A Case Study of Shanghai
    Ma, Jinghui
    Yu, Zhongqi
    Qu, Yuanhao
    Xu, Jianming
    Cao, Yu
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01) : 128 - 138
  • [40] Evaluation of different machine learning approaches and aerosol optical depth in PM2.5 prediction
    Karimian, Hamed
    Li, Yaqian
    Chen, Youliang
    Wang, Zhaoru
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 216