Performance comparison of residue management units of no-tillage sowing systems: A review

被引:22
|
作者
Aikins K.A. [1 ,2 ]
Antille D.L. [1 ,3 ]
Jensen T.A. [1 ]
Blackwell J. [4 ]
机构
[1] University of Southern Queensland, Centre for Agricultural Engineering, Toowoomba, Queensland
[2] Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Kumasi
[3] CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory
[4] Charles Sturt University, Institute for Land, Water and Society, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales
来源
关键词
Disc coulter; Energy-use efficiency; No-tillage seeder; Residue management; Row cleaner;
D O I
10.1016/j.eaef.2018.12.006
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Appropriate residue management is a key factor underlying successful crop establishment in no-tillage systems. Satisfactory opening and closing of furrows, and uniform seeding depth and seed-spacing are achieved when the design of the residue management unit of the seeder, and machinery settings are correctly selected for the soil type, soil condition, and soil surface residue characteristics. Improper selection of such units or settings can result in blockage of tine furrow openers, with accumulated residues and hairpinning when disc openers are used. This can affect seed-soil contact and result in uneven seedling emergence or sub-optimal plant stand, and reduce crop yield potential. This article critically examines the effectiveness of residue management units of no-tillage sowing equipment in maintaining appropriate levels (e.g., ≥30%) of residue cover on sown rows, preventing the interference of such residue with opening and closing of furrows (blockage), enabling the seed to be correctly placed (depth control, seed-spacing), and by discussing the influence of unit's design on fuel consumption and power (draft) requirements. This review confirmed that smooth disc coulters, finger row cleaners, and their combinations can retain more than the minimum residue cover recommended for no-tillage systems. Power-assisted units can operate with surface residue up to about 9000 kg ha −1 without blockage, but their adoption in developing countries is restricted by relatively high fuel consumption. Future evaluations of residue management units need to be conducted under controlled conditions. Such work will enable parametrization of suitable models (DEM) and will advance the understanding of soil-machine-residue interactions to further assist the design of no-tillage equipment. Priority research areas are presented and discussed. © 2018 Asian Agricultural and Biological Engineering Association
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 190
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Tillage and crop residue management practices for sustainable dryland farming systems
    Unger, PW
    Schomberg, HH
    Dao, TH
    Jones, OR
    ANNALS OF ARID ZONE, 1997, 36 (03) : 209 - 232
  • [32] Spatial variability of physical attributes of a cohesive soil under conventional and no-tillage management systems
    Ribeiro, Leticia da Silva
    de Oliveira, Ismenia Ribeiro
    Dantas, Jussara Silva
    da Silva, Camila Vieira
    da Silva, Grazieli Brito
    de Azevedo, James Ribeiro
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2016, 51 (09) : 1699 - 1702
  • [33] Soil Microbial Community Cultivated with Peppers in No-Tillage and Conventional Systems Associated with Weed Management
    Cunha, J. L. X. L.
    Freitas, F. C. L.
    Ambrosio, M. M. Q.
    Fontes, L. O.
    Nascimento, P. G. M. L.
    Guimaraes, L. M. S.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2014, 32 (03) : 543 - 554
  • [34] A Review of Challenge and Prospect of No-Tillage Practice to Sustain Spices Cropping Systems in North Maluku
    Ishak, Lily
    Sarni
    Ladjinga, Erwin
    Hadun, Ramli
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FOOD, AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES (FANRES 2019), 2020, 194 : 1 - 6
  • [35] Performance of common beans cultivars in both conventional and no-tillage systems using different straws
    Laurinho dos Santos, Raimundo Luiz
    Donizete Correa, Joao Batista
    Bastos de Andrade, Messias Jose
    de Morais, Augusto Ramalho
    CIENCIA E AGROTECNOLOGIA, 2004, 28 (05): : 978 - 989
  • [36] Comparison of the energy consumption in traditional and advanced paddy residue management technologies for wheat sowing
    Parveen
    Jain, Mukesh
    Rani, Vijya
    Kumar, Hemant
    Jaideep
    Mor, Aman
    Sachin
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE, 2021, 20 (03): : 846 - 851
  • [37] A review of tillage effects on crop residue management, seedbed conditions and seedling establishment
    Guérif, J
    Richard, G
    Dürr, C
    Machet, JM
    Recous, S
    Roger-Estrade, J
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2001, 61 (1-2): : 13 - 32
  • [38] Soybean grown after green manures under no-tillage and conventional management systems in savannah soil
    de Carvalho, MAC
    Athayde, MLF
    Soratto, RP
    Alves, MC
    Arf, O
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2004, 39 (11) : 1141 - 1148
  • [39] Dry bean responses to nitrogen fertilizer in two tillage and residue management systems
    Liebman, Matt
    Corson, Sue
    Rowe, Richard J.
    Halteman, William A.
    Agronomy Journal, 1995, 87 (03)
  • [40] Herbicide-soil interactions in reduced tillage and plant residue management systems
    Locke, MA
    Bryson, CT
    WEED SCIENCE, 1997, 45 (02) : 307 - 320