Performance comparison of residue management units of no-tillage sowing systems: A review

被引:22
|
作者
Aikins K.A. [1 ,2 ]
Antille D.L. [1 ,3 ]
Jensen T.A. [1 ]
Blackwell J. [4 ]
机构
[1] University of Southern Queensland, Centre for Agricultural Engineering, Toowoomba, Queensland
[2] Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Kumasi
[3] CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory
[4] Charles Sturt University, Institute for Land, Water and Society, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales
来源
关键词
Disc coulter; Energy-use efficiency; No-tillage seeder; Residue management; Row cleaner;
D O I
10.1016/j.eaef.2018.12.006
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Appropriate residue management is a key factor underlying successful crop establishment in no-tillage systems. Satisfactory opening and closing of furrows, and uniform seeding depth and seed-spacing are achieved when the design of the residue management unit of the seeder, and machinery settings are correctly selected for the soil type, soil condition, and soil surface residue characteristics. Improper selection of such units or settings can result in blockage of tine furrow openers, with accumulated residues and hairpinning when disc openers are used. This can affect seed-soil contact and result in uneven seedling emergence or sub-optimal plant stand, and reduce crop yield potential. This article critically examines the effectiveness of residue management units of no-tillage sowing equipment in maintaining appropriate levels (e.g., ≥30%) of residue cover on sown rows, preventing the interference of such residue with opening and closing of furrows (blockage), enabling the seed to be correctly placed (depth control, seed-spacing), and by discussing the influence of unit's design on fuel consumption and power (draft) requirements. This review confirmed that smooth disc coulters, finger row cleaners, and their combinations can retain more than the minimum residue cover recommended for no-tillage systems. Power-assisted units can operate with surface residue up to about 9000 kg ha −1 without blockage, but their adoption in developing countries is restricted by relatively high fuel consumption. Future evaluations of residue management units need to be conducted under controlled conditions. Such work will enable parametrization of suitable models (DEM) and will advance the understanding of soil-machine-residue interactions to further assist the design of no-tillage equipment. Priority research areas are presented and discussed. © 2018 Asian Agricultural and Biological Engineering Association
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 190
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Residue management and minimum tillage systems for soybean following wheat
    Vyn, TJ
    Opoku, G
    Swanton, CJ
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1998, 90 (02) : 131 - 138
  • [22] Dry bean production with various tillage and residue management systems
    Deibert, EJ
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 1995, 36 (3-4): : 97 - 109
  • [23] RESIDUE MANAGEMENT IN DOUBLE-CROP CONSERVATION TILLAGE SYSTEMS
    LANGDALE, GW
    HARGROVE, WL
    GIDDENS, J
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1984, 76 (04) : 689 - 694
  • [24] Dry bean production with various tillage and residue management systems
    Deibert, E. J.
    Soil and Tillage Research, 1600, 36 (3-4):
  • [25] No-tillage soybean performance in cover crops for weed management in the western Corn Belt
    Williams, MM
    Mortensen, DA
    Doran, JW
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2000, 55 (01) : 79 - 84
  • [26] An economic comparison between conventional and no-tillage farming systems in Burleson County, Texas
    Ribera, LA
    Hons, FM
    Richardson, JW
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2004, 96 (02) : 415 - 424
  • [27] Short-Term Crop Residue Management in No-Tillage Cultivation Effects on Soil Quality Indicators in Virginia
    Battaglia, Martin L.
    Thomason, Wade
    Ozlu, Ekrem
    Rezaei-Chiyaneh, Esmaeil
    Fike, John H.
    Diatta, Andre Amakobo
    Uslu, Omer Suha
    Babur, Emre
    Schillaci, Calogero
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [28] CORN-HYBRID PERFORMANCE UNDER CONVENTIONAL AND NO-TILLAGE SYSTEMS AFTER THINNING
    CARTER, PR
    BARNETT, KH
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1987, 79 (05) : 919 - 926
  • [29] Soil management shapes bacterial and archaeal communities in soybean rhizosphere: Comparison of no-tillage and integrated crop-livestock systems
    Costa, Romario Martins
    Costa, Mayanna Karlla Lima
    Rocha, Sandra Mara Barbosa
    Leite, Marcos Renan Lima
    Neto, Francisco de Alcantara
    de Souza, Henrique Antunes
    Pereira, Arthur Prudencio de Araujo
    Melo, Vania Maria Maciel
    de Medeiros, Erika Valente
    Mendes, Lucas William
    Araujo, Ademir Sergio Ferreira
    RHIZOSPHERE, 2024, 30
  • [30] A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TILLAGE SEEDING SYSTEMS - THE INTERACTION OF TILLAGE AND TIME OF SOWING ON SANDPLAIN SOILS IN WESTERN-AUSTRALIA
    SCHMIDT, CP
    BELFORD, RK
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1993, 33 (07): : 895 - 900