Performance comparison of residue management units of no-tillage sowing systems: A review

被引:22
|
作者
Aikins K.A. [1 ,2 ]
Antille D.L. [1 ,3 ]
Jensen T.A. [1 ]
Blackwell J. [4 ]
机构
[1] University of Southern Queensland, Centre for Agricultural Engineering, Toowoomba, Queensland
[2] Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Kumasi
[3] CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory
[4] Charles Sturt University, Institute for Land, Water and Society, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales
来源
关键词
Disc coulter; Energy-use efficiency; No-tillage seeder; Residue management; Row cleaner;
D O I
10.1016/j.eaef.2018.12.006
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Appropriate residue management is a key factor underlying successful crop establishment in no-tillage systems. Satisfactory opening and closing of furrows, and uniform seeding depth and seed-spacing are achieved when the design of the residue management unit of the seeder, and machinery settings are correctly selected for the soil type, soil condition, and soil surface residue characteristics. Improper selection of such units or settings can result in blockage of tine furrow openers, with accumulated residues and hairpinning when disc openers are used. This can affect seed-soil contact and result in uneven seedling emergence or sub-optimal plant stand, and reduce crop yield potential. This article critically examines the effectiveness of residue management units of no-tillage sowing equipment in maintaining appropriate levels (e.g., ≥30%) of residue cover on sown rows, preventing the interference of such residue with opening and closing of furrows (blockage), enabling the seed to be correctly placed (depth control, seed-spacing), and by discussing the influence of unit's design on fuel consumption and power (draft) requirements. This review confirmed that smooth disc coulters, finger row cleaners, and their combinations can retain more than the minimum residue cover recommended for no-tillage systems. Power-assisted units can operate with surface residue up to about 9000 kg ha −1 without blockage, but their adoption in developing countries is restricted by relatively high fuel consumption. Future evaluations of residue management units need to be conducted under controlled conditions. Such work will enable parametrization of suitable models (DEM) and will advance the understanding of soil-machine-residue interactions to further assist the design of no-tillage equipment. Priority research areas are presented and discussed. © 2018 Asian Agricultural and Biological Engineering Association
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 190
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EFFECT OF PLANT RESIDUE ON HERBICIDE PERFORMANCE IN NO-TILLAGE CORN
    ERBACH, DC
    LOVELY, WG
    WEED SCIENCE, 1975, 23 (06) : 512 - 515
  • [2] Crop Residue and Potassium Management on Crop and Soil Properties of Maize and Wheat in No-tillage Systems
    Madar, Raghavendra
    Singh, Yudhvir
    Meena, Mahesh Chand
    Gaind, Sunita
    Das, Tapas Kumar
    Verma, Rakesh Kumar
    Halli, Hanamant
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2021, 52 (07) : 769 - 791
  • [3] CORN AND SOYBEAN YIELD RESPONSE TO CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT UNDER NO-TILLAGE PRODUCTION SYSTEMS
    WILHELM, WW
    DORAN, JW
    POWER, JF
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1986, 78 (01) : 184 - 189
  • [4] No-tillage furrow opener performance: a review of tool geometry, settings and interactions with soil and crop residue
    Aikins, Kojo Atta
    Barr, James B.
    Ucgul, Mustafa
    Jensen, Troy A.
    Antille, Diogenes L.
    Desbiolles, Jack M. A.
    SOIL RESEARCH, 2020, 58 (07) : 603 - 621
  • [5] Comparison of soil phosphorus and phosphatase activity under long-term no-tillage and maize residue management
    Yang, Xiaozhu
    Bao, Xuelian
    Yang, Yali
    Zhao, Yue
    Liang, Chao
    Xie, Hongtu
    PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 65 (08) : 408 - 415
  • [6] EFFECTS OF RESIDUE COVER ON PESTICIDE LOSSES FROM CONVENTIONAL AND NO-TILLAGE SYSTEMS
    KENIMER, AL
    MOSTAGHIMI, S
    YOUNG, RW
    DILLAHA, TA
    SHANHOLTZ, VO
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1987, 30 (04): : 953 - 959
  • [7] Weed management in watermelon crop in no-tillage and conventional systems
    da Silva, Marcio Gledson O.
    de Freitas, Francisco Claudio L.
    de Negreiros, Maria Zuleide
    de Mesquita, Helida C.
    de Santana, Fabiana Aline O.
    de Lima, Mayky Francley P.
    HORTICULTURA BRASILEIRA, 2013, 31 (03) : 494 - 499
  • [8] COMPARISON OF SOIL SURFACE ARTHROPOD POPULATIONS IN CONVENTIONAL TILLAGE, NO-TILLAGE AND OLD FIELD SYSTEMS
    BLUMBERG, AY
    CROSSLEY, DA
    AGRO-ECOSYSTEMS, 1983, 8 (3-4): : 247 - 253
  • [9] MANAGEMENT OF BED-FURROW IRRIGATED SOIL WITH LIMITED-TILLAGE AND NO-TILLAGE SYSTEMS
    MUSICK, JT
    WIESE, AF
    ALLEN, RR
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1977, 20 (04): : 666 - 672
  • [10] The effects of previous crop residue, sowing direction and slope length on phosphorus losses from eroded sediments under no-tillage
    Barbosa, Fabricio Tondello
    Bertol, Ildegardis
    Wolschick, Neuro Hilton
    Vazquez, Eva Vidal
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2021, 206