An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for evaluating suppliers' co-design ability in new product development

被引:0
|
作者
Sumrit, Detcharat [1 ]
机构
[1] Cluster of Logistics and Rail Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, 25/25 Phuttamonthon 4 Road, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
关键词
Decision making - Product development - Product design;
D O I
10.1504/IJADS.2020.106417
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There are many methods for managing the complexity and challenges of new product development (NPD) under faster emerging technology. Most firms use them to collaborate with external organisations for their co-design on new products. This study purposes to provide a measurement model by applying multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach to evaluate suppliers' co-design capabilities in NPD in terms of product structural design and engineering, product concept and functional design, and process design. This MCDM includes fuzzy step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) to determine the relative weights of criteria and fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) to rank the results of suppliers' capabilities regarding to their co-design in NPD. Given the result, supplier with the highest collaboration performance rating is selected at first. The evaluation of suppliers' collaboration is regarded as an essential starting point for management challenge to develop suppliers' capabilities. © 2020 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 246
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluating Government Websites Using a Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach
    Buyukozkan, Guelcin
    [J]. 9TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON E-GOVERNMENT, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 190 - 199
  • [22] Fuzzy Group Multi-Criteria Decision-Making on Selecting & Evaluating of AMT
    Zhu, Xiaoxia
    Zhang, Weiwei
    [J]. ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1-4, 2012, 472-475 : 3163 - 3170
  • [23] A Distance-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach to Problem of Supplier Involvement in New Product Development
    Akman, Gulsen
    Otkur, F. Mine
    Okudan, Guel E.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, DETC 2010, VOL 6, 2010, : 17 - 25
  • [24] Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making for evaluating mutual fund strategies
    Wang, Shin-Yun
    Lee, Cheng-Few
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2011, 43 (24) : 3405 - 3414
  • [25] Fuzzy multi-criteria approach for criticality assessment and optimization of decision making
    Chakhrit, Ammar
    Chennoufi, Mohammed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2021, 41 (02) : 2701 - 2716
  • [26] An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Evaluating Wind Farm Performance
    Kang, He-Yau
    Hung, Meng-Chan
    Pearn, W. L.
    Lee, Amy H. I.
    Kang, Mei-Sung
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2011, 4 (11) : 2002 - 2026
  • [27] Fuzzy multi-criteria acceptability analysis: A new approach to multi-criteria decision analysis under fuzzy environment
    Yatsalo, Boris
    Korobov, Alexander
    Martinez, L.
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2017, 84 : 262 - 271
  • [28] Integrated process capability and multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Cansu Dağsuyu
    Ulviye Polat
    Ali Kokangül
    [J]. Soft Computing, 2021, 25 : 7169 - 7180
  • [29] A FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING APPROACH FOR EVALUATING THE HEALTH-CARE WASTE TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES
    Nabizadeh, Ramin
    Mahvi, Amir Hossein
    Khazaei, Mohammad
    Zamanzadeh, Mirzaman
    Yari, Ahmad Reza
    Jafari, Ali
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2018, 17 (12): : 2795 - 2805
  • [30] Integrated process capability and multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Dagsuyu, Cansu
    Polat, Ulviye
    Kokangul, Ali
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 25 (10) : 7169 - 7180