Evaluation of treated wastewater produced by five different Sewage Treatment Plants using three different technologies - Oman experience

被引：0
|
作者：
Al Hashami A.M. [1 ]
Victor R. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Biology, College of Science, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat
来源：
International Journal of Environmental Studies | 2022年 / 79卷 / 03期
关键词：
Comparison; relative merits; technology; treated wastewater;
D O I：
10.1080/00207233.2021.1905288
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
The quality of treated wastewater produced in five different Sewage Treatment Plants (STPs) using three different technologies, Conventional Activated Sludge (CAS), Extended Aeration System and Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) was evaluated. The CAS was the best; it had the highest general efficiency (EG) with a value of 96.6%. The STPs using EAS had maintenance problems. The MBR is relatively less efficient. In order to get treated wastewater of good quality, the standard of operation and maintenance are important; but the use of suitable technology to operate with optimum efficiency in a given environment is imperative. © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
引用
收藏
页码：513 / 533
页数：20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of the environmental impact of microbial aerosols generated by wastewater treatment plants utilizing different aeration systems
    Brandi, G
    Sisti, M
    Amagliani, G
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 88 (05) : 845 - 852
  • [42] Comparison of six sewage effluents treated with different treatment technologies-Population level responses in the harpacticoid copepod Nitocra spinipes
    Lundstrom, Elin
    Bjorlenius, Berndt
    Brinkmann, Markus
    Hollert, Henner
    Persson, Jan-Olov
    Breitholtz, Magnus
    AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY, 2010, 96 (04) : 298 - 307
  • [43] Energetic evaluation of phenol wastewater treatment by reverse electrodialysis reactor using different anodes
    Wang, Sixue
    Wu, Xi
    Xu, Shiming
    Leng, Qiang
    Jin, Dongxu
    Wang, Ping
    Dong, Fujiang
    Wu, Debing
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 329
  • [44] Study on the treatment of oilfield produced wastewater with different salinities using halophile enhanced biological activated carbon
    Huanjing Kexue, 2007, 10 (2213-2218):
  • [45] Performance of piggery wastewater treatment and biogas upgrading by three microalgal cultivation technologies under different initial COD concentration
    Gao, Shumei
    Hu, Changwei
    Sun, Shiqing
    Xu, Jie
    Zhao, Yongjun
    Zhang, Hui
    ENERGY, 2018, 165 : 360 - 369
  • [46] Evaluation of different wastewater treatment techniques in three WWTPs in Istanbul for the removal of selected EDCs in liquid phase
    Can, Zehra Semra
    Firlak, Melike
    Kerc, Aslihan
    Evcimen, Serkan
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2014, 186 (01) : 525 - 539
  • [47] Evaluation of different wastewater treatment techniques in three WWTPs in Istanbul for the removal of selected EDCs in liquid phase
    Zehra Semra Can
    Melike Fırlak
    Aslıhan Kerç
    Serkan Evcimen
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2014, 186 : 525 - 539
  • [48] Evaluation of different practices to estimate construction inventories for life cycle assessment of small to medium wastewater treatment plants
    Morera, Serni
    Santana, Mark V. E.
    Comas, Joaquim
    Rigola, Miquel
    Corominas, Lluis
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 245
  • [49] Evaluation of phytotoxicity effect of olive mill wastewater treated by different technologies on seed germination of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)
    Munir J. M. Rusan
    Ammar A. Albalasmeh
    Said Zuraiqi
    Mohammad Bashabsheh
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015, 22 : 9127 - 9135
  • [50] Evaluation of phytotoxicity effect of olive mill wastewater treated by different technologies on seed germination of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)
    Rusan, Munir J. M.
    Albalasmeh, Ammar A.
    Zuraiqi, Said
    Bashabsheh, Mohammad
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2015, 22 (12) : 9127 - 9135
12345