COMPUTATIONAL METHOD OF NODAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE PRICING PROCESS IN THE ELECTRICITY MARKET

被引:0
|
作者
Borukaiev Z.Kh. [1 ]
Evdokimov V.A. [1 ]
Ostapchenko K.B. [2 ]
机构
[1] G.E. Pukhov Institute for Modelling in Energy Engineering National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, General Naumov Str.,15, Kyiv
[2] National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Peremohy Ave.,37, Kyiv
来源
Technical Electrodynamics | 2022年 / 2022卷 / 05期
关键词
Agent; Electricity market; Nodal transformation method; Price index; Pricing process; Simulation model;
D O I
10.15407/techned2022.05.067
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The main attention in the article is given to the development of the method of nodal transformation of the pricing process in the electricity market. The sequence of implementation of the main constructive stages of its development and further use is given, such as: descriptions of the pricing process; formalization of the pricing process; development of computational procedures for building a simulation model of the pricing process. A distinctive feature of this method from the known and described in the scientific literature is the direct connection of the dynamic energy flow at all stages of the technological process of production, transmission and distribution of electricity with the economic flow. The computational procedures of the method are implemented using the discrete-event approach. The method is designed to build a simulation model of the pricing process in the electricity market, which along with a system of short-term price forecasting models in different market segments, becomes the key in the information and methodological support of multi-agent environment for the market agents interaction. References 13, figures 2 © 2022. Technical Electrodynamics.All Rights Reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 76
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ERCOT Electricity Market: Transition from Zonal to Nodal Market Operation
    Daneshi, H.
    Srivastava, A. K.
    2011 IEEE POWER AND ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, 2011,
  • [32] A Power Quality Pricing Method Based on Risk Management in Deregulated Electricity Retail Market
    Wu, Jianling
    Zhou, Hui
    Ni, Xiangsheng
    Wu, Shousong
    Liu, Haoming
    Hou, Yunhe
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY (POWERCON), 2018, : 843 - 848
  • [33] Quantitative Evaluation Method of Transmission Pricing Mechanism Under Circumstance of Electricity Spot Market
    Cong Y.
    Zhang L.
    Tao W.
    Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2020, 40 (21): : 6925 - 6935
  • [34] Electricity Market Pricing Method Considering Multiple Statistical Moments of Renewable Energy Uncertainty
    Lei X.
    Yang Z.
    Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2023, 43 (15): : 5772 - 5784
  • [35] A novel method for the clearing of a day-ahead electricity market with mixed pricing rules
    Dourbois, Grigoris A.
    Biskas, Pandelis. N.
    2017 IEEE MANCHESTER POWERTECH, 2017,
  • [36] Pricing decisions and market power in the UK electricity market: A VECM approach
    Amountzias, Chrysovalantis
    Dagdeviren, Hulya
    Patokos, Tassos
    ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 108 : 467 - 473
  • [37] Electricity value equivalent (EVE) pricing system and relevant systems design. Part three: Electricity value equivalent pricing method for hydro-units in electricity market
    Yan, Maosong
    Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2003, 27 (11): : 1 - 4
  • [38] Nodal, zonal, or uniform electricity pricing: how to deal with network congestion
    Weibelzahl, Martin
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY, 2017, 11 (02) : 210 - 232
  • [39] Production efficiency of nodal and zonal pricing in imperfectly competitive electricity markets
    Sarfati, Mahir
    Hesamzadeh, Mohammad Reza
    Holmberg, Par
    ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2019, 24 : 193 - 206
  • [40] Nodal, zonal, or uniform electricity pricing: how to deal with network congestion
    Martin Weibelzahl
    Frontiers in Energy, 2017, 11 : 210 - 232