Comparison of biomechanical effects of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods and titanium rods in lumbar long-segment instrumentation: a finite element study

被引:3
|
作者
Li, Chao [1 ]
Zhao, Yao [1 ]
Qi, Longtao [1 ]
Xu, Beiyu [1 ]
Yue, Lei [1 ]
Zhu, Ranlyu [1 ]
Li, Chunde [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
lumbar degenerative disease; posterior lumbar instrumentation; PEEK; dynamic stabilization; adjacent segment degeneration; finite element analysis; PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION; INTERBODY FUSION; SPINE; ADJACENT; STABILIZATION; STIFFNESS; STRESS;
D O I
10.3389/fbioe.2024.1416046
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Introduction Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) lumbar fusion rods have been successfully used in short-segment posterior instrumentation to prevent adjacent segment degeneration. However, limited studies have reported their application in lumbar long-segment instrumentation. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical performances of PEEK rods and titanium rods in lumbar long-segment instrumentation using finite element (FE) models, with the expectation of providing clinical guidance.Methods A lumbar FE model (A) and four lumbar fixation FE models (BI, CI, BII, CII) of the L1-S1 vertebral body were developed using CT image segmentation (A: intact model; BI: intact model with L2-S1 PEEK rod internal fixation; CI: intact model with L2-S1 titanium rod internal fixation; BII: intact model with L3-S1 PEEK rod internal fixation; CII: intact model with L3-S1 titanium rod internal fixation). A 150-N preload was applied to the top surface of L1, similar to the intact model. The stresses on the lumbar intervertebral disc, facet joint, pedicle screws, and rods were calculated to evaluate the biomechanical effect of the different fixation procedures in lumbar long-segment instrumented surgery.Results Under the four physiological motion states, the average stresses on the adjacent segment intervertebral disc and facet joint in all fixation models were greater than those in the intact model. Furthermore, the average stresses on the adjacent segment intervertebral disc and facet joint were greater in models CI and CII than in models BI and BII, respectively. The average stresses on the pedicle screws and rods were decreased in models BI and BII compared with models CI and CII under the four physiological motion states, respectively.Discussion The PEEK rod internal fixation system may have better biomechanical properties than the titanium rod internal fixation system in delaying adjacent segment degeneration, improving the lumbar function of postoperative patients, and reducing the risk of screw loosening and breakage in lumbar long-segment instrumentation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biomechanical Effects of Different Sitting Postures and Physiologic Movements on the Lumbar Spine: A Finite Element Study
    Cho, Mingoo
    Han, Jun-Sang
    Kang, Sungwook
    Ahn, Chang-Hwan
    Kim, Dong-Hee
    Kim, Chul-Hyun
    Kim, Kyoung-Tae
    Kim, Ae-Ryoung
    Hwang, Jong-Moon
    BIOENGINEERING-BASEL, 2023, 10 (09):
  • [42] The biomechanical effects of graded upper articular process arthroplasty on lumbar spine: A finite element study
    Shi, Zewen
    Liu, Jiangtao
    Yu, Xiao
    Jiang, Luyong
    Wu, Haihao
    Pang, Qingjiang
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2020, 25 (05) : 793 - 799
  • [43] The effect of soft tissue properties on overall biomechanical response of a human lumbar motion segment: a preliminary finite element study
    Cunningham, H.
    Little, J. P.
    Pearcy, M. J.
    Adam, C. J.
    MODELLING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY VII, 2007, 12 : 93 - 102
  • [44] Biomechanical study of proximal adjacent segment degeneration after posterior lumbar interbody fusion and fixation: a finite element analysis
    Shuai Jiang
    Weishi Li
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 14
  • [45] Biomechanical study of proximal adjacent segment degeneration after posterior lumbar interbody fusion and fixation: a finite element analysis
    Jiang, Shuai
    Li, Weishi
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2019, 14 (1)
  • [46] Comparison of the Biomechanical Effect of the FFX Device Compared With Other Lumbar Fusion Devices: A Finite Element Study
    Simon, Lionel
    Millot, Fabrice
    Hoarau, Xavier
    Buttin, Romain
    Srour, Robin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 16 (05): : 935 - 943
  • [47] Biomechanical impact of cortical bone vs. traditional pedicle screw trajectories: a finite element study on lumbar spinal instrumentation
    Li, Xishan
    Abdel-Latif, Khaled H. A.
    Schwab, Jefrem
    Zhou, Xiang
    Yang, Jie
    Ritter, Zully M.
    Schilling, Arndt F.
    Reinhold, Maximilian
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2025, 13
  • [48] Biomechanical study of two-level oblique lumbar interbody fusion with different types of lateral instrumentation: a finite element analysis
    Zhong, Yuan
    Wang, Yujie
    Zhou, Hong
    Wang, Yudong
    Gan, Ziying
    Qu, Yimeng
    Hua, Runjia
    Chen, Zhaowei
    Chu, Genglei
    Liu, Yijie
    Jiang, Weimin
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [49] Biomechanical effects of osteoporosis on adjacent segments after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: A finite element study
    Zhang, Chenchen
    Chang, Minmin
    Zhang, Renwen
    Tang, Shujie
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 37 (02) : 403 - 408
  • [50] Biomechanical comparison of effects of the Dynesys and Coflex dynamic stabilization systems on range of motion and loading characteristics in the lumbar spine: a finite element study
    Kulduk, Ahmet
    Altun, Necdet S.
    Senkoylu, Alpaslan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2015, 11 (04): : 400 - 405