Facilitators and barriers to the adoption of active back-support exoskeletons in the construction industry

被引:5
|
作者
Okunola, Akinwale [1 ]
Afolabi, Adedeji [1 ]
Akanmu, Abiola [1 ]
Jebelli, Houtan [2 ]
Simikins, Susan [3 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Myers Lawson Sch Construct, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Univ Illinois Urbana & Champaign, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Champaign, IL USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Psychol, University Pk, PA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Delphi study; Active back-support exoskeleton; Construction industry; Musculoskeletal disorders; Technology-Organization-Environment theory; RFID ADOPTION; TECHNOLOGY; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsr.2024.05.010
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Active back-support exoskeletons are gaining more awareness as a solution to the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the construction industry. This study aims to understand the factors that influence the adoption of active back-support exoskeletons in the construction industry. Method: A literature review was conducted to gather relevant adoption factors related to exoskeleton implementation. Building on the TOE (Technology, Organization, and Environment) framework, two rounds of the survey via the Delphi technique were administered with 13 qualified industry professionals to determine the most important adoption factors using the relative importance index. Through semi-structured interviews, the professionals expressed their perspectives on the impact of active back-support exoskeletons on the construction industry. Results: Important factors included 18 facilitators and 21 barriers. The impact of the exoskeletons in the construction industry was categorized into expected benefits, barriers, solutions, adjustment to technology, implementation, and applicable tasks. Conclusions: This study identified the factors to be considered in the adoption and implementation of active back-support exoskeletons in the construction industry from the perspective of stakeholders. The study also elucidates the impact of active exoskeletons on construction organizations and the broader environment. Practical Applications: This study provides useful guidance to construction companies interested in adopting active back-support exoskeletons. Our results will also help manufacturers of active back-support exoskeletons to understand the functional requirements and adjustments required for utilization in the construction industry. Lastly, the study expands the application of the TOE framework to the adoption of active back-support exoskeletons in the construction industry.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 415
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Using parallel elasticity in back-support exoskeletons: a study on energy consumption during industrial lifting tasks
    Toxiri, Stefano
    Verstraten, Tom
    Calanca, Andrea
    Caldwell, Darwin G.
    Ortiz, Jesus
    2019 WEARABLE ROBOTICS ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE (WEARRACON), 2019, : 1 - 6
  • [32] Barriers to Adoption of Ergonomic Innovations in the Construction Industry
    Glimskar, Bo
    Lundberg, Stefan
    ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, 2013, 21 (04) : 26 - 30
  • [33] Biomechanical assessment of two back-support exoskeletons in symmetric and asymmetric repetitive lifting with moderate postural demands
    Madinei, Saman
    Alemi, Mohammad Mehdi
    Kim, Sunwook
    Srinivasan, Divya
    Nussbaum, Maury A.
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2020, 88
  • [34] Rationale, Implementation and Evaluation of Assistive Strategies for an Active Back-Support Exoskeleton
    Toxiri, Stefano
    Koopman, Axel S.
    Lazzaroni, Maria
    Ortiz, Jesus
    Power, Valerie
    de Looze, Michiel P.
    O'Sullivan, Leonard
    Caldwell, Darwin G.
    FRONTIERS IN ROBOTICS AND AI, 2018, 5
  • [35] Effects of two passive back-support exoskeletons on postural balance during quiet stance and functional limits of stability
    Park, Jang-Ho
    Kim, Sunwook
    Nussbaum, Maury A.
    Srinivasan, Divya
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2021, 57
  • [36] Barriers hindering biomimicry adoption and application in the construction industry
    Oguntona, Olusegun A.
    Aigbavboa, Clinton O.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 11 (03): : 289 - 297
  • [37] Sensor adoption in the construction industry: Barriers, opportunities, and strategies
    Wang, Zhong
    Gonzalez, Vicente A.
    Mei, Qipei
    Lee, Gaang
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 170
  • [38] Assessment of an On-board Classifier for Activity Recognition on an Active Back-Support Exoskeleton
    Poliero, Tommaso
    Toxiri, Stefano
    Anastasi, Sara
    Monica, Luigi
    Caldwell, Darwin G.
    Ortiz, Jesus
    2019 IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON REHABILITATION ROBOTICS (ICORR), 2019, : 559 - 564
  • [39] Effects of Two Passive Back-Support Exoskeletons on Muscle Activity, Energy Expenditure, and Subjective Assessments During Repetitive Lifting
    Alemi, Mohammad Mehdi
    Madinei, Saman
    Kim, Sunwook
    Srinivasan, Divya
    Nussbaum, Maury A.
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2020, 62 (03) : 458 - 474
  • [40] Heuristic Evaluations of Back-Support, Shoulder-Support, Handgrip-Strength Support, and Sit-Stand-Support Exoskeletons Using Universal Design Principles
    Martinez, Alejandra
    Tovar, Laura
    Amparan, Carla Irigoyen
    Gonzalez, Karen
    Edayath, Prajina
    Pennathur, Priyadarshini
    Pennathur, Arunkumar
    IISE TRANSACTIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL ERGONOMICS & HUMAN FACTORS, 2025,