Facilitators and barriers to the adoption of active back-support exoskeletons in the construction industry

被引:5
|
作者
Okunola, Akinwale [1 ]
Afolabi, Adedeji [1 ]
Akanmu, Abiola [1 ]
Jebelli, Houtan [2 ]
Simikins, Susan [3 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Myers Lawson Sch Construct, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Univ Illinois Urbana & Champaign, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Champaign, IL USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Psychol, University Pk, PA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Delphi study; Active back-support exoskeleton; Construction industry; Musculoskeletal disorders; Technology-Organization-Environment theory; RFID ADOPTION; TECHNOLOGY; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsr.2024.05.010
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Active back-support exoskeletons are gaining more awareness as a solution to the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the construction industry. This study aims to understand the factors that influence the adoption of active back-support exoskeletons in the construction industry. Method: A literature review was conducted to gather relevant adoption factors related to exoskeleton implementation. Building on the TOE (Technology, Organization, and Environment) framework, two rounds of the survey via the Delphi technique were administered with 13 qualified industry professionals to determine the most important adoption factors using the relative importance index. Through semi-structured interviews, the professionals expressed their perspectives on the impact of active back-support exoskeletons on the construction industry. Results: Important factors included 18 facilitators and 21 barriers. The impact of the exoskeletons in the construction industry was categorized into expected benefits, barriers, solutions, adjustment to technology, implementation, and applicable tasks. Conclusions: This study identified the factors to be considered in the adoption and implementation of active back-support exoskeletons in the construction industry from the perspective of stakeholders. The study also elucidates the impact of active exoskeletons on construction organizations and the broader environment. Practical Applications: This study provides useful guidance to construction companies interested in adopting active back-support exoskeletons. Our results will also help manufacturers of active back-support exoskeletons to understand the functional requirements and adjustments required for utilization in the construction industry. Lastly, the study expands the application of the TOE framework to the adoption of active back-support exoskeletons in the construction industry.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 415
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Factors influencing the adoption of passive exoskeletons in the construction industry: Industry perspectives
    Gonsalves, Nihar
    Akanmu, Abiola
    Shojaei, Alireza
    Agee, Philip
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2024, 100
  • [22] Performance and effectiveness of a passive back-support exoskeleton in manual material handling tasks in the construction industry
    Ali Golabchi
    Niromand Jasimi Zindashti
    Linda Miller
    Hossein Rouhani
    Mahdi Tavakoli
    Construction Robotics, 2023, 7 (1) : 77 - 88
  • [23] Effects of back-support exoskeletons with different functional mechanisms on trunk muscle activity and kinematics
    Reimeir, Benjamin
    Calisti, Maite
    Mittermeier, Ronja
    Ralfs, Lennart
    Weidner, Robert
    WEARABLE TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 4
  • [24] Barriers and facilitators of HACCP adoption in the Armenian dairy industry
    Galstyan, Suren H.
    Harutyunyan, Tsovinar L.
    BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2016, 118 (11): : 2676 - 2691
  • [25] Studying the Effects of Back-Support Exoskeletons on Workers' Cognitive Load during Material Handling Tasks
    Liu, Yizhi
    Gautam, Yogesh
    Ojha, Amit
    Shayesteh, Shayan
    Jebelli, Houtan
    CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2024: ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, AUTOMATION, AND COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN CONSTRUCTION, 2024, : 659 - 669
  • [26] Effects of industrial back-support exoskeletons on body loading and user experience: an updated systematic review
    Kermavnar, Tjasa
    de Vries, Aijse W.
    de Looze, Michiel P.
    O'Sullivan, Leonard W.
    ERGONOMICS, 2021, 64 (06) : 685 - 711
  • [27] Versatile and non-versatile occupational back-support exoskeletons: A comparison in laboratory and field studies
    Poliero, Tommaso
    Sposito, Matteo
    Toxiri, Stefano
    Di Natali, Christian
    Iurato, Matteo
    Sanguineti, Vittorio
    Caldwell, Darwin G.
    Ortiz, Jesus
    WEARABLE TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 2
  • [28] Effects of passive back-support exoskeletons on physical demands and usability during patient transfer tasks
    Hwang, Jaejin
    Yerriboina, Venkata Naveen Kumar
    Ari, Hemateja
    Kim, Jeong Ho
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2021, 93
  • [29] Identifying Facilitators, Barriers, and Potential Solutions of Adopting Exoskeletons and Exosuits in Construction Workplaces
    Mahmud, Dilruba
    Bennett, Sean T. T.
    Zhu, Zhenhua
    Adamczyk, Peter G. G.
    Wehner, Michael
    Veeramani, Dharmaraj
    Dai, Fei
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (24)
  • [30] Quantifying the biomechanical effects of back-support exoskeletons on work movements using statistical parametric mapping
    Riemer, Julia
    Wischniewski, Sascha
    Jaitner, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2024, 91 : 492 - 504