Detection of Subtle ECG Changes Despite Superimposed Artifacts by Different Machine Learning Algorithms

被引:0
|
作者
Noitz, Matthias [1 ]
Moertl, Christoph [1 ]
Boeck, Carl [2 ]
Mahringer, Christoph [3 ]
Bodenhofer, Ulrich [4 ]
Duenser, Martin W. [1 ]
Meier, Jens [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Kepler Univ Hosp GmbH, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care Med, A-4040 Linz, Austria
[2] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Inst Signal Proc, JKU LIT SAL eSPML Lab, Altenberger Str 69, A-4040 Linz, Austria
[3] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Kepler Univ Hosp GmbH, Dept Med Engn, A-4040 Linz, Austria
[4] Univ Appl Sci Upper Austria, Sch Informat Commun & Media, Softwarepk 11, A-4232 Hagenberg, Austria
关键词
ECG; ECG morphology; random forests; McSharry algorithm; Gaussian jitter; machine learning; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM;
D O I
10.3390/a17080360
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Analyzing electrocardiographic (ECG) signals is crucial for evaluating heart function and diagnosing cardiac pathology. Traditional methods for detecting ECG changes often rely on offline analysis or subjective visual inspection, which may overlook subtle variations, particularly in the case of artifacts. In this theoretical, proof-of-concept study, we investigated the potential of five different machine learning algorithms [random forests (RFs), gradient boosting methods (GBMs), deep neural networks (DNNs), an ensemble learning technique, as well as logistic regression] to detect subtle changes in the morphology of synthetically generated ECG beats despite artifacts. Following the generation of a synthetic ECG beat using the standardized McSharry algorithm, the baseline ECG signal was modified by changing the amplitude of different ECG components by 0.01-0.06 mV. In addition, a Gaussian jitter of 0.1-0.3 mV was overlaid to simulate artifacts. Five different machine learning algorithms were then applied to detect differences between the modified ECG beats. The highest discriminatory potency, as assessed by the discriminatory accuracy, was achieved by RFs and GBMs (accuracy of up to 1.0), whereas the least accurate results were obtained by logistic regression (accuracy approximately 10% less). In a second step, a feature importance algorithm (Boruta) was used to discriminate which signal parts were responsible for difference detection. For all comparisons, only signal components that had been modified in advance were used for discretion, demonstrating that the RF model focused on the appropriate signal elements. Our findings highlight the potential of RFs and GBMs as valuable tools for detecting subtle ECG changes despite artifacts, with implications for enhancing clinical diagnosis and monitoring. Further studies are needed to validate our findings with clinical data.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Brain Tumor Detection Techniques by Using Different Machine Learning YOLO Algorithms
    Tasnim, Faria
    Islam, Md Tobibul
    Maisha, Aniqa Tahsin
    Sultana, Israt
    Akter, Tasnia
    Islam, Md Toufiqul
    FOURTH CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, VOL 2, CIS 2023, 2024, 869 : 51 - 65
  • [42] Deep Learning Algorithms Improve the Detection of Subtle Lisfranc Malalignments on Weightbearing Radiographs
    Ashkani-Esfahani, Soheil
    Mojahed-Yazdi, Reza
    Bhimani, Rohan
    Kerkhoffs, Gino M.
    Maas, Mario
    DiGiovanni, Christopher W.
    Lubberts, Bart
    Guss, Daniel
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 43 (08) : 1118 - 1126
  • [43] ECG data analysis and heart disease prediction using machine learning algorithms
    Thithi, Sushimita Roy
    Akfar, Afifa
    Aleem, Fahimul
    Chakrabarty, Amitabha
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2019 IEEE REGION 10 SYMPOSIUM (TENSYMP), 2019, : 819 - 824
  • [44] A Comparative Study on Machine Learning Algorithms in Emotion State Recognition Using ECG
    Vaish, Abhishek
    Kumari, Pinki
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING FOR PROBLEM SOLVING (SOCPROS 2012), 2014, 236 : 1467 - 1476
  • [45] Machine learning algorithms for diabetes detection: a comparative evaluation of performance of algorithms
    Surabhi Saxena
    Debashish Mohapatra
    Subhransu Padhee
    Goutam Kumar Sahoo
    Evolutionary Intelligence, 2023, 16 : 587 - 603
  • [46] Machine learning algorithms for diabetes detection: a comparative evaluation of performance of algorithms
    Saxena, Surabhi
    Mohapatra, Debashish
    Padhee, Subhransu
    Sahoo, Goutam Kumar
    EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 16 (02) : 587 - 603
  • [47] Usages of Spark Framework with Different Machine Learning Algorithms
    Mohamed, Mohamed Ali
    El-Henawy, Ibrahim Mahmoud
    Salah, Ahmad
    COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 2021
  • [48] Comparison of Different Machine Learning Algorithms for Detecting Bankruptcy
    Keya, Maria Sultana
    Akter, Himu
    Rahman, Md Atiqur
    Rahman, Md Mahbobur
    Emon, Minhaz Uddin
    Zulfiker, Md Sabab
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INVENTIVE COMPUTATION TECHNOLOGIES (ICICT 2021), 2021, : 705 - 712
  • [49] Comparative Analysis of Different Machine Learning Algorithms in Classification
    Wang, Lincong
    Xu, Weiwen
    Zhu, Zhenghao
    2022 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA, INFORMATION AND COMPUTER NETWORK (BDICN 2022), 2022, : 257 - 263
  • [50] Real-time sensor fault detection in Tokamak using different machine learning algorithms
    Mohapatra, Debashish
    Subudhi, Bidyadhar
    Daniel, Raju
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2020, 151