Detection of Subtle ECG Changes Despite Superimposed Artifacts by Different Machine Learning Algorithms

被引:0
|
作者
Noitz, Matthias [1 ]
Moertl, Christoph [1 ]
Boeck, Carl [2 ]
Mahringer, Christoph [3 ]
Bodenhofer, Ulrich [4 ]
Duenser, Martin W. [1 ]
Meier, Jens [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Kepler Univ Hosp GmbH, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care Med, A-4040 Linz, Austria
[2] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Inst Signal Proc, JKU LIT SAL eSPML Lab, Altenberger Str 69, A-4040 Linz, Austria
[3] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Kepler Univ Hosp GmbH, Dept Med Engn, A-4040 Linz, Austria
[4] Univ Appl Sci Upper Austria, Sch Informat Commun & Media, Softwarepk 11, A-4232 Hagenberg, Austria
关键词
ECG; ECG morphology; random forests; McSharry algorithm; Gaussian jitter; machine learning; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM;
D O I
10.3390/a17080360
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Analyzing electrocardiographic (ECG) signals is crucial for evaluating heart function and diagnosing cardiac pathology. Traditional methods for detecting ECG changes often rely on offline analysis or subjective visual inspection, which may overlook subtle variations, particularly in the case of artifacts. In this theoretical, proof-of-concept study, we investigated the potential of five different machine learning algorithms [random forests (RFs), gradient boosting methods (GBMs), deep neural networks (DNNs), an ensemble learning technique, as well as logistic regression] to detect subtle changes in the morphology of synthetically generated ECG beats despite artifacts. Following the generation of a synthetic ECG beat using the standardized McSharry algorithm, the baseline ECG signal was modified by changing the amplitude of different ECG components by 0.01-0.06 mV. In addition, a Gaussian jitter of 0.1-0.3 mV was overlaid to simulate artifacts. Five different machine learning algorithms were then applied to detect differences between the modified ECG beats. The highest discriminatory potency, as assessed by the discriminatory accuracy, was achieved by RFs and GBMs (accuracy of up to 1.0), whereas the least accurate results were obtained by logistic regression (accuracy approximately 10% less). In a second step, a feature importance algorithm (Boruta) was used to discriminate which signal parts were responsible for difference detection. For all comparisons, only signal components that had been modified in advance were used for discretion, demonstrating that the RF model focused on the appropriate signal elements. Our findings highlight the potential of RFs and GBMs as valuable tools for detecting subtle ECG changes despite artifacts, with implications for enhancing clinical diagnosis and monitoring. Further studies are needed to validate our findings with clinical data.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms on Different Datasets
    Uysal, Elif
    Ozturk, Ali
    2018 26TH SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (SIU), 2018,
  • [22] Applying machine learning algorithms for stuttering detection
    Filipowcz, Piotr
    Kostek, Bozena
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2023, 153 (03):
  • [23] Detection of Depression Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Kumar, M. Ravi
    Pooja, Kadoori
    Udathu, Meghana
    Prasanna, J. Lakshmi
    Santhosh, Chella
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONLINE AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 18 (04) : 155 - 163
  • [24] Machine Learning Algorithms and Frameworks in Ransomware Detection
    Smith, Daryle
    Khorsandroo, Sajad
    Roy, Kaushik
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 117597 - 117610
  • [25] Fall Detection Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Vallabh, Pranesh
    Malekian, Reza
    Ye, Ning
    Bogatinoska, Dijana Capeska
    2016 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE, TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER NETWORKS (SOFTCOM), 2016, : 51 - 59
  • [26] Malware Detection and Classification with Machine Learning Algorithms
    Kumar, R. Vinoth
    Islam, Md Mojahidul
    Apon, Abir Hossain
    Prantha, C. S.
    SMART TRENDS IN COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS, VOL 5, SMARTCOM 2024, 2024, 949 : 143 - 158
  • [27] Machine Learning Algorithms for Traffic Interruption Detection
    Karnati, Yashaswi
    Mahajan, Dhruv
    Rangarajan, Anand
    Ranka, Sanjay
    2020 FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FOG AND MOBILE EDGE COMPUTING (FMEC), 2020, : 231 - 236
  • [28] NEW SPECTRAL DETECTION AND ELIMINATION TEST ALGORITHMS OF ECG AND EOG ARTIFACTS IN NEONATAL EEG RECORDINGS
    WITTE, H
    GLASER, S
    ROTHER, M
    MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 1987, 25 (02) : 127 - 130
  • [29] Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Spam Detection
    Sadia, Azeema
    Bashir, Fatima
    Khan, Reema Qaiser
    Bashir, Amna
    Khalid, Ammarah
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 14 (02) : 178 - 184
  • [30] Ensemble of Machine Learning Algorithms for Intrusion Detection
    Chou, Te-Shun
    Fan, Jeffrey
    Fan, Sharon
    Makki, Kia
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS (SMC 2009), VOLS 1-9, 2009, : 3976 - +