Dosimetric response of radiophotoluminescent glass detectors in a scanning pencil proton beam

被引:0
|
作者
Pasaricek, Luka [1 ]
Knezevic, Zeljka [1 ]
Brkic, Hrvoje [2 ,3 ]
Davidkova, Marie [4 ]
Navratil, Matej [5 ]
Vondracek, Vladimir [5 ]
Majer, Marija [1 ]
机构
[1] Rudjer Boskovic Inst, Zagreb, Croatia
[2] Fac Med Osijek, Osijek, Croatia
[3] Fac Dent Med & Hlth Osijek, Osijek, Croatia
[4] CAS, Radiat Dosimetry Dept, Nucl Phys Inst, Prague, Czech Republic
[5] Proton Therapy Ctr Czech Sro, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
Dose response; Relative efficiency; RPL glass detector; Scanning pencil proton beam; OPTICALLY STIMULATED LUMINESCENCE; THERMOLUMINESCENCE EFFICIENCY; RELATIVE EFFICIENCY; ENERGY PHOTON; TL DETECTORS; PHOTOLUMINESCENCE; DEPENDENCE; AL2O3C; FIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.radmeas.2024.107195
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The dose and linear energy transfer (LET) dependence of the radiophotoluminescence (RPL) response was evaluated for RPL glass detectors, taken from the environmental dosimeter type SC-1, using a clinical 100 MeV and 200 MeV scanning pencil proton beam. The measurements were performed at different positions along the Bragg curves. The fluence-averaged (LETf) and dose-averaged (LETd) LET at the positions of the detectors were calculated using two Monte Carlo codes (MCNP and PHITS). Before measurements in proton beams, the linearity of the dose response for the dose range of interest (up to 10 Gy) was checked and confirmed in a Co-60 gamma ray field, since the FGD-202 reader for SC-1 dosimeters is usually used for doses up to 1 Gy and we found no data for higher doses in the literature. For proton beams, the linear dose response was determined for the doses investigated from 0.5 Gy to 8.8 Gy. For the LET range, which corresponds to the LETd from 0.47 keV/mu m to 4.70 keV/mu m, a decrease in response with an increase in LET was observed.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improving the precision and performance of proton pencil beam scanning
    Safai, Sairos
    Bula, Christian
    Meer, David
    Pedroni, Eros
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 1 (03) : 196 - 206
  • [32] Pencil-beam scanning proton therapy for anal cancer: a dosimetric comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Ojerholm, Eric
    Kirk, Maura L.
    Thompson, Reid F.
    Zhai, Huifang
    Metz, James M.
    Both, Stefan
    Ben-Josef, Edgar
    Plastaras, John P.
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2015, 54 (08) : 1209 - 1217
  • [33] 3-D Dosimetric Assessment for a Proton Pencil Beam by Optical CT Scanning of Plastic Radiochromic Dosimeters
    Wuu, C.
    Xu, Y.
    Qian, X.
    Admovics, J.
    Cascio, E.
    Lu, H.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [34] Robustness and dosimetric verification of hippocampal-sparing craniospinal pencil beam scanning proton plans for pediatric medulloblastoma
    Edvardssona, Anneli
    Gorgisyan, Jenny
    Anderssonc, Karin M.
    Dahlgren, Christina Vallhagen
    Dasu, Alexandru
    Gram, Daniel
    Bjork-Eriksson, Thomas
    Rosenschold, Per Munck af
    [J]. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 29
  • [35] Pencil beam scanning proton therapy for treatment of the retroperitoneum after nephrectomy for Wilms tumor: A dosimetric comparison study
    Vogel, Jennifer
    Lin, Haibo
    Both, Stefan
    Tochner, Zelig
    Balis, Frank
    Hill-Kayser, Christine
    [J]. PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2017, 64 (01) : 39 - 45
  • [36] Spot Position Uncertainty of Scanning Proton Pencil Beam
    Li, H.
    Zhu, X.
    Ciangaru, G.
    Sahoo, N.
    Suzuki, K.
    Lee, A.
    Gillin, M.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06)
  • [37] Pencil Beam Scanning:: a dynamical approach to proton therapy
    Sepulchre, R
    Gérard, M
    Marchand, B
    Prieels, D
    Bauvir, B
    [J]. IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIO-INFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 370 - 375
  • [38] Implement Volumetric Repainting for Proton Pencil Beam Scanning
    Tang, S.
    Song, L.
    Du, K.
    Chang, C.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E270 - E270
  • [39] A Knowledge-Based Planning Approach for Dosimetric Prediction of Prostate Proton Pencil-Beam Scanning Plans
    Zou, W.
    Teo, B.
    O'Reilly, S.
    Ainsley, C.
    Lin, A.
    Xiao, Y.
    Dong, L.
    Yin, L.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E658 - E658
  • [40] Proton FLASH: passive scattering or pencil beam scanning?
    Zhang, Guoliang
    Wang, Junliang
    Wang, Yuenan
    Peng, Hao
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 66 (03):