Efficacy and Safety of General Anesthesia Induction with Ciprofol in Hip Fracture Surgery of Elderly Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:1
|
作者
Lu, Yan-fei [1 ]
Wu, Ji-min [2 ]
Lan, Hai-yan [2 ]
Xu, Qiao-min [2 ]
Shi, Shu-qi [2 ]
Duan, Gong-chen [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Prov Peoples Hosp, Hangzhou Med Coll, Affiliated Peoples Hosp, Ctr Rehabil Med, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Univ, Lishui Peoples Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Lishui Hosp, 1188,Liyang St, Lishui 323000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Ciprofol; elderly; Hip fracture surgery; general anesthesia; hypotension; NONCARDIAC SURGERY; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.2147/DDDT.S475176
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Background: Ciprofol is a new intravenous sedative / anesthetic drug. In recent years, many clinical studies have also confirmed the sedative effect of ciprofol. However, more clinical research is still needed on its clinical application characteristics in special populations. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical effects of ciprofol and propofol in general anesthesia induction of elderly patients. Methods: 60 elderly (aged >= 75 years) patients underwent hip fracture surgery were randomly into two groups of a 1:1 ratio. Group C (ciprofol group): 0.3mg/kg ciprofol was infused. Group P (propofol group): 1.5mg/kg propofol was infused. The observation period was from the infusion of test drug to 5 min after endotracheal intubation. The primary outcomes included the incidence of severe hypotension and hypotension during the observation period. The secondary outcomes were as follows: the success rate of general anesthesia induction, the number of additional sedation, the time of loss of consciousness (LOC), Delta MAP, Delta HR, adverse events and the frequency of vasoactive drugs used. Results: Finally, 60 subjects completed the study. Compared with Group P, the incidence of severe hypotension in Group C was lower (26.7% vs 53.3%, P = 0.035), the incidence of hypotension was also lower (36.7% vs 63.3%, P = 0.037), Delta MAP in Group C was significantly lower (31.4 +/- 11.4 vs 39.6 +/- 15.7, P = 0.025), the frequency of ephedrine used and the incidence of injection pain in Conclusion: Ciprofol showed similar efficacy to propofol when used for general anesthesia induction in elderly patients underwent hip fracture surgery and could maintain more stable blood pressure.
引用
收藏
页码:3951 / 3958
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of postoperative awakening between ciprofol and propofol in elderly patients undergoing hip replacement surgery: a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial
    Yang, Dawei
    Zhou, Jie
    Sun, Luyu
    Li, Min
    Zhang, Jianyou
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2024,
  • [22] The efficacy and safety of ciprofol and propofol in patients undergoing colonoscopy: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
    Gao, Shi-Hui
    Tang, Qian-Qian
    Wang, Chang-Ming
    Guan, Zhan-Ying
    Wang, Ling-Ling
    Zhang, Jing
    Yan, Zeng-Long
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2024, 95
  • [23] Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for the induction of anesthesia in adult patients: a multicenter phase 2a clinical trial
    Zhu, Qianmei
    Luo, Zhen
    Wang, Xia
    Wang, Dongxin
    Li, Jun
    Wei, Xinchuan
    Tang, Jun
    Yao, Shanglong
    Ouyang, Wen
    Zhang, Wensheng
    Zuo, Yunxia
    Wang, Xiao
    Liu, Jin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2023, 45 (02) : 473 - 482
  • [24] Comparison of Effects between Combined Lumbar-Sacral Plexus Block plus General Anesthesia and Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Tang, Lili
    Fang, Panpan
    Fang, Yuxin
    Lu, Yao
    Xu, Guanghong
    Liu, Xuesheng
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 2021
  • [25] Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for the induction of anesthesia in adult patients: a multicenter phase 2a clinical trial
    Qianmei Zhu
    Zhen Luo
    Xia Wang
    Dongxin Wang
    Jun Li
    Xinchuan Wei
    Jun Tang
    Shanglong Yao
    Wen Ouyang
    Wensheng Zhang
    Yunxia Zuo
    Xiao Wang
    Jin Liu
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2023, 45 : 473 - 482
  • [26] PROSPECTIVE, MULTICENTER TRIAL OF MORTALITY FOLLOWING GENERAL OR SPINAL-ANESTHESIA FOR HIP FRACTURE SURGERY IN THE ELDERLY
    DAVIS, FM
    WOOLNER, DF
    FRAMPTON, C
    WILKINSON, A
    GRANT, A
    HARRISON, RT
    ROBERTS, MTS
    THADAKA, R
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1987, 59 (09) : 1080 - 1088
  • [27] Efficacy of preoperative Tranexamic Acid in patients undergoing intertrochanteric hip fracture surgery: A randomized placebo controlled trial
    Shah, Faaiz Ali
    Naeemullah, Mian Amjad
    Ali, Mian Amjad
    Iqbal, Mian Javed
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 39 (06) : 1601 - 1605
  • [28] Long-term Outcomes with Spinal versus General Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Surgery: A Randomized Trial
    Vail, Emily A.
    Feng, Rui
    Sieber, Frederick
    Carson, Jeffrey L.
    Ellenberg, Susan S.
    Magaziner, Jay
    Dillane, Derek
    Marcantonio, Edward R.
    Sessler, Daniel I.
    Ayad, Sabry
    Stone, Trevor
    Papp, Steven
    Donegan, Derek
    Mehta, Samir
    Schwenk, Eric S.
    Marshall, Mitchell
    Jaffe, J. Douglas
    Luke, Charles
    Sharma, Balram
    Azim, Syed
    Hymes, Robert
    Chin, Ki-Jinn
    Sheppard, Richard
    Perlman, Barry
    Sappenfield, Joshua
    Hauck, Ellen
    Tierney, Ann
    Horan, Annamarie D.
    Neuman, Mark D.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 140 (03) : 375 - 386
  • [29] Tranexamic acid in hip fracture surgery: a randomized controlled trial
    Zufferey, P. J.
    Miquet, M.
    Quenet, S.
    Martin, P.
    Adam, P.
    Albaladejo, P.
    Mismetti, P.
    Molliex, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 104 (01) : 23 - 30
  • [30] Efficacy and safety of perioperative tranexamic acid in elderly patients undergoing trochanteric fracture surgery: a randomised controlled trial
    Chen, F.
    Jiang, Z.
    Li, M.
    Zhu, X.
    HONG KONG MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (02) : 120 - 126