Assessment of the three representative empirical models for zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) using the CMONOC data

被引:2
|
作者
Yuan, Debao [1 ]
Li, Jian [1 ]
Yao, Yifan [1 ]
Yang, Fei [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yingying [1 ]
Chen, Ran [1 ]
Xu, Tairan [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol Beijing, Coll Geosci & Surveying Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Hubei Luojia Lab, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
关键词
GNSS; Zenith tropospheric delay; Empirical ZTD model; CMONOC data; INTERFEROMETRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.geog.2024.01.006
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The precise correction of atmospheric zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) is significant for the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) performance regarding positioning accuracy and convergence time. In the past decades, many empirical ZTD models based on whether the gridded or scattered ZTD products have been proposed and widely used in the GNSS positioning applications. But there is no comprehensive evaluation of these models for the whole China region, which features complicated topography and climate. In this study, we completely assess the typical empirical models, the IGGtropSH model (gridded, non-meteorology), the SHAtropE model (scattered, non-meteorology), and the GPT3 model (gridded, meteorology) using the Crustal Movement Observation Network of China (CMONOC) network. In general, the results show that the three models share consistent performance with RMSE/bias of 37.45/1.63, 37.13/2.20, and 38.27/1.34 mm for the GPT3, SHAtropE and IGGtropSH model, respectively. However, the models had a distinct performance regarding geographical distribution, elevation, seasonal variations, and daily variation. In the southeastern region of China, RMSE values are around 50 mm, which are much higher than that in the western region, approximately 20 mm. The SHAtropE model exhibits better performance for areas with large variations in elevation. The GPT3 model and the IGGtropSH model are more stable across different months, and the SHAtropE model based on the GNSS data exhibits superior performance across various UTC epochs. (c) 2024 Editorial office of Geodesy and Geodynamics. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:488 / 494
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improved Zenith Tropospheric Delay Modeling Using the Piecewise Model of Atmospheric Refractivity
    Yang, Liu
    Gao, Jingxiang
    Zhu, Dantong
    Zheng, Nanshan
    Li, Zengke
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (23) : 1 - 15
  • [32] Prediction of Zenith tropospheric delay in GNSS observations using support vector regression
    Akar, Ali Utku
    Inal, Cevat
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2023, 71 (11) : 4659 - 4680
  • [33] Impact of GPS Zenith Tropospheric Delay data on precipitation forecasts in Mediterranean France and Spain
    Vedel, H
    Huang, XY
    Haase, J
    Ge, M
    Calais, E
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2004, 31 (02) : L021021 - 4
  • [34] Assessment of GNSS zenith tropospheric delay responses to atmospheric variables derived from ERA5 data over Nigeria
    Nzelibe, Ifechukwu Ugochukwu
    Tata, Herbert
    Idowu, Timothy Oluwadare
    SATELLITE NAVIGATION, 2023, 4 (01):
  • [35] Assessment of GNSS zenith tropospheric delay responses to atmospheric variables derived from ERA5 data over Nigeria
    Ifechukwu Ugochukwu Nzelibe
    Herbert Tata
    Timothy Oluwadare Idowu
    Satellite Navigation, 2023, 4
  • [36] Improving tropospheric corrections on large-scale Sentinel-1 interferograms using a machine learning approach for integration with GNSS-derived zenith total delay (ZTD)
    Shamshiri, Roghayeh
    Motagh, Mandi
    Nahavandchi, Hossein
    Haghighi, Mahmud Haghshenas
    Hoseini, Mostafa
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 239 (239)
  • [37] Evaluation of Zenith Tropospheric Delay Derived from ERA5 Data over China Using GNSS Observations
    Jiang, Chunhua
    Xu, Tianhe
    Wang, Shuaimin
    Nie, Wenfeng
    Sun, Zhangzhen
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (04)
  • [38] A Novel Method for Monitoring Tropical Cyclones' Movement Using GNSS Zenith Tropospheric Delay
    Lian, Dajun
    He, Qimin
    Li, Li
    Zhang, Kefei
    Fu, Erjiang
    Li, Guangyan
    Wang, Rui
    Gao, Biqing
    Song, Kangming
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (13)
  • [39] An Application of IGS Zenith Tropospheric Delay Data to Propagation Studies: Validation of Radiometric Atmospheric Attenuation
    Sites, Gustavo A.
    Manuel Riera, Jose
    Garcia-del-Pino, Pedro
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 2016, 64 (01) : 262 - 270
  • [40] The Impact of Different Ocean Tide Loading Models on GNSS Estimated Zenith Tropospheric Delay Using Precise Point Positioning Technique
    Zhang, Jinglei
    Wang, Xiaoming
    Li, Zishen
    Li, Shuhui
    Qiu, Cong
    Li, Haobo
    Zhang, Shaotian
    Li, Li
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (18)