Assessment of the three representative empirical models for zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) using the CMONOC data

被引:2
|
作者
Yuan, Debao [1 ]
Li, Jian [1 ]
Yao, Yifan [1 ]
Yang, Fei [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yingying [1 ]
Chen, Ran [1 ]
Xu, Tairan [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol Beijing, Coll Geosci & Surveying Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Hubei Luojia Lab, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
关键词
GNSS; Zenith tropospheric delay; Empirical ZTD model; CMONOC data; INTERFEROMETRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.geog.2024.01.006
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The precise correction of atmospheric zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) is significant for the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) performance regarding positioning accuracy and convergence time. In the past decades, many empirical ZTD models based on whether the gridded or scattered ZTD products have been proposed and widely used in the GNSS positioning applications. But there is no comprehensive evaluation of these models for the whole China region, which features complicated topography and climate. In this study, we completely assess the typical empirical models, the IGGtropSH model (gridded, non-meteorology), the SHAtropE model (scattered, non-meteorology), and the GPT3 model (gridded, meteorology) using the Crustal Movement Observation Network of China (CMONOC) network. In general, the results show that the three models share consistent performance with RMSE/bias of 37.45/1.63, 37.13/2.20, and 38.27/1.34 mm for the GPT3, SHAtropE and IGGtropSH model, respectively. However, the models had a distinct performance regarding geographical distribution, elevation, seasonal variations, and daily variation. In the southeastern region of China, RMSE values are around 50 mm, which are much higher than that in the western region, approximately 20 mm. The SHAtropE model exhibits better performance for areas with large variations in elevation. The GPT3 model and the IGGtropSH model are more stable across different months, and the SHAtropE model based on the GNSS data exhibits superior performance across various UTC epochs. (c) 2024 Editorial office of Geodesy and Geodynamics. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:488 / 494
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of ERA5 derived zenith tropospheric delay data over East African region
    Ssenyunzi, Richard Cliffe
    Andima, Geoffrey
    Amabayo, Emirant Bertillas
    Kiroe, Anthony Joseph
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2024, 74 (02) : 695 - 710
  • [22] Modelling Tropospheric Zenith Delays Using Regression Models Based on Surface Meteorology Data
    Tuchband, Tamas
    Rozsa, Szabolcs
    GEODESY FOR PLANET EARTH: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 IAG SYMPOSIUM, 2012, 136 : 789 - 794
  • [23] Estimating zenith tropospheric delay using PPP ambiguity resolution technique
    Xu, Zongqiu
    Han, Pengtao
    Xu, Aigong
    Tang, Longjiang
    Li, Lei
    Qi, Guangsong
    Zhongguo Kuangye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, 2019, 48 (02): : 445 - 451
  • [24] Modeling of Zenith Tropospheric Delay using ERA5 data over East African region
    Andima, Geoffrey
    Ssenyunzi, Richard Cliffe
    Amabayo, Emirant Bertillas
    Mascitelli, Alessandra
    Realini, Eugenio
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS, 2024, 265
  • [25] Zenith Tropospheric Delay of GLONASS/GPS Signals on the Basis of ATOVS Satellite Data
    Kashkin, V. B.
    Vladimirov, V. M.
    Klykov, A. O.
    ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC OPTICS, 2015, 28 (01) : 68 - 73
  • [26] Zenith Tropospheric Delay Estimates Using Absolute and Relative Approaches to GNSS Data Processing - Preliminary Results
    Golaszewski, Pawel
    Stepniak, Katarzyna
    Wielgosz, Pawel
    2017 BALTIC GEODETIC CONGRESS (BGC GEOMATICS), 2017, : 414 - 418
  • [27] Methods and Evaluation of AI-Based Meteorological Models for Zenith Tropospheric Delay Prediction
    Xiong, Si
    Mei, Jiamu
    Xu, Xinchuang
    Shen, Ziyu
    Huang, Liangke
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (22)
  • [28] Impact of GPS antenna phase center models on zenith wet delay and tropospheric gradients
    Ejigu, Yohannes Getachew
    Hunegnaw, Addisu
    Abraha, Kibrom Ebuy
    Teferle, Felix Norman
    GPS SOLUTIONS, 2019, 23 (01)
  • [29] Impact of GPS antenna phase center models on zenith wet delay and tropospheric gradients
    Yohannes Getachew Ejigu
    Addisu Hunegnaw
    Kibrom Ebuy Abraha
    Felix Norman Teferle
    GPS Solutions, 2019, 23
  • [30] Evaluation of Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of Different Zenith Tropospheric Delay Models in Antarctica
    Li, Fei
    Zhang, Qingchuan
    Zhang, Shengkai
    Lei, Jintao
    Li, Wenhao
    RADIO SCIENCE, 2020, 55 (05)