Performance of Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes decision rules in acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Dizaji, Shayan Roshdi [1 ]
Ahmadzadeh, Koohyar [1 ]
Zarei, Hamed [1 ]
Miri, Reza [2 ]
Yousefifard, Mahmoud [1 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Med Sci, Physiol Res Ctr, Hemmat Highway,POB 14665354, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Prevent Cardiovasc Dis Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
acute coronary syndrome; decision support techniques; diagnosis; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL RISK SCORES; CHEST-PAIN; SYNDROMES MACS; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; AID; DERIVATION; BIOMARKER;
D O I
10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001147
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Multiple decision-aiding models are available to help physicians identify acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and accelerate the decision-making process in emergency departments (EDs). This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of the Manchester Acute Coronary Syndrome (MACS) rule and its derivations, enhancing the evidence for their clinical use. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception until October 2023 for studies including adult ED patients with suspected cardiac chest pain and inconclusive findings requiring ACS risk-stratification. The predictive value of MACS, Troponin-only MACS (T-MACS), or History and Electrocardiogram-only MACS (HE-MACS) decision aids for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and 30-day major adverse cardiac outcomes (MACEs) among patients admitted to ED with chest pain suspected of ACS. Overall sensitivity and specificity were synthesized using the 'Diagma' package in STATA statistical software. Applicability and risk of bias assessment were performed using the QUADAS-2 tool. For AMI detection, MACS has a sensitivity of 99% [confidence interval (CI): 97-100], specificity of 19% (CI: 10-32), and AUC of 0.816 (CI: 0.720-0.885). T-MACS shows a sensitivity of 98% (CI: 98-99), specificity of 35% (CI: 29-42), and AUC of 0.859 (CI: 0.824-0.887). HE-MACS exhibits a sensitivity of 99% (CI: 98-100), specificity of 9% (CI: 3-21), and AUC of 0.787 (CI: 0.647-0.882). For MACE detection, MACS demonstrates a sensitivity of 98% (CI: 94-100), specificity of 22% (CI: 10-42), and AUC of 0.804 (CI: 0.659-0.897). T-MACS displays a sensitivity of 96% (CI: 94-98), specificity of 36% (CI: 30-43), and AUC of 0.792 (CI: 0.748-0.830). HE-MACS maintains a sensitivity of 99% (CI: 97-99), specificity of 10% (CI 6-16), and AUC of 0.713 (CI: 0.625-0.787). Of all the MACS models, T-MACS displayed the highest overall accuracy due to its high sensitivity and significantly superior specificity. T-MACS exhibits very good diagnostic performance in predicting both AMI and MACE. This makes it a highly promising tool for managing patients with acute chest pain.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 323
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Antidepressant treatment in patients following acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis
    Sweda, Romy
    Siontis, George C. M.
    Nikolakopoulou, Adriani
    Windecker, Stephan
    Pilgrim, Thomas
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2020, 7 (06): : 3610 - 3620
  • [32] A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF OPTIMAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY FOR DIABETIC PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES
    Rossington, Jennifer
    Brown, Oliver
    Hoye, Angela
    HEART, 2015, 101 : A8 - A9
  • [33] DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS STRATEGIES IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS
    Knijnik, Leonardo Mees
    Fernandes, Marcelo
    Maza, Manuel Rivera
    Montanez-Valverde, Raul
    Cardoso, Rhanderson
    Fernandes, Amanda
    Fernandes, Gilson
    Cohen, Mauricio G.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (11) : 55 - 55
  • [34] Meta-Analysis of Bleeding Scores Performance for Acute Coronary Syndrome
    Wang, Tom Kai Ming
    Mehta, Ojas Hrakesh
    Liao, Yi-Wen Becky
    Wang, Michael Tzu Min
    Stewart, Ralph
    White, Harvey
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2020, 29 (12): : 1749 - 1757
  • [36] Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Shah, Rajendra P.
    Shafiq, Aimen
    Hamza, Mohammad
    Maniya, Muhammad Talha
    Duhan, Sanchit
    Keisham, Bijeta
    Patel, Bansari
    Alamzaib, Sardar Muhammad
    Yashi, Kanica
    Uppal, Dipan
    Sattar, Yasar
    Tiwari, Dinesh
    Paul, Timir K.
    AlJaroudi, Wael
    Alraies, M. Chadi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 207 : 206 - 214
  • [37] The Risk Factors of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Young Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Siagian, Sisca Natalia
    Christianto, Christianto
    Angellia, Phoniex
    Holiyono, Ho Indra
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2023, 19 (03) : 37 - 49
  • [38] Optimal Timing of Complete Revascularization in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gaffar, Rouan
    Habib, Bettina
    Filion, Kristian B.
    Reynier, Pauline
    Eisenberg, Mark J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2017, 6 (04):
  • [39] Estimating the Prevalence of Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Kramer, Adam I.
    Trinder, Mark
    Brunham, Liam R.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 35 (10) : 1322 - 1331
  • [40] Colchicine for secondary prevention in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shaikh, Safia
    Hamza, Mohammad
    Neppala, Sivaram
    Singh, Sahib
    Upreti, Prakash
    Umer, Ahmed Muaaz
    Manish, K. C.
    Pandya, Krutarth
    Bahar, Yasemin
    Sattar, Yasar
    Alraies, M. Chadi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2025, 425