Performance of Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes decision rules in acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Dizaji, Shayan Roshdi [1 ]
Ahmadzadeh, Koohyar [1 ]
Zarei, Hamed [1 ]
Miri, Reza [2 ]
Yousefifard, Mahmoud [1 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Med Sci, Physiol Res Ctr, Hemmat Highway,POB 14665354, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Prevent Cardiovasc Dis Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
acute coronary syndrome; decision support techniques; diagnosis; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL RISK SCORES; CHEST-PAIN; SYNDROMES MACS; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; AID; DERIVATION; BIOMARKER;
D O I
10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001147
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Multiple decision-aiding models are available to help physicians identify acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and accelerate the decision-making process in emergency departments (EDs). This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of the Manchester Acute Coronary Syndrome (MACS) rule and its derivations, enhancing the evidence for their clinical use. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception until October 2023 for studies including adult ED patients with suspected cardiac chest pain and inconclusive findings requiring ACS risk-stratification. The predictive value of MACS, Troponin-only MACS (T-MACS), or History and Electrocardiogram-only MACS (HE-MACS) decision aids for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and 30-day major adverse cardiac outcomes (MACEs) among patients admitted to ED with chest pain suspected of ACS. Overall sensitivity and specificity were synthesized using the 'Diagma' package in STATA statistical software. Applicability and risk of bias assessment were performed using the QUADAS-2 tool. For AMI detection, MACS has a sensitivity of 99% [confidence interval (CI): 97-100], specificity of 19% (CI: 10-32), and AUC of 0.816 (CI: 0.720-0.885). T-MACS shows a sensitivity of 98% (CI: 98-99), specificity of 35% (CI: 29-42), and AUC of 0.859 (CI: 0.824-0.887). HE-MACS exhibits a sensitivity of 99% (CI: 98-100), specificity of 9% (CI: 3-21), and AUC of 0.787 (CI: 0.647-0.882). For MACE detection, MACS demonstrates a sensitivity of 98% (CI: 94-100), specificity of 22% (CI: 10-42), and AUC of 0.804 (CI: 0.659-0.897). T-MACS displays a sensitivity of 96% (CI: 94-98), specificity of 36% (CI: 30-43), and AUC of 0.792 (CI: 0.748-0.830). HE-MACS maintains a sensitivity of 99% (CI: 97-99), specificity of 10% (CI 6-16), and AUC of 0.713 (CI: 0.625-0.787). Of all the MACS models, T-MACS displayed the highest overall accuracy due to its high sensitivity and significantly superior specificity. T-MACS exhibits very good diagnostic performance in predicting both AMI and MACE. This makes it a highly promising tool for managing patients with acute chest pain.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 323
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE IMPACT OF COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME : A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Prasitlumkum, Narut
    Ding, Kimberly
    Doyle, Kieran
    Natarajan, Balaji
    Pai, Ramdas
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 77 (18) : 76 - 76
  • [22] Smoking cessation after acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lovatt, Saul
    Wong, Chun Wai
    Holroyd, Eric
    Butler, Rob
    Phan, Thanh
    Patwala, Ashish
    Loke, Yoon K.
    Mallen, Christian D.
    Kwok, Chun Shing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 75 (12)
  • [23] Evaluating the Utility of Colchicine in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bao, Yu-Lin
    Gu, Ling-Feng
    Du, Chong
    Wang, Ya-Xin
    Wang, Lian-Sheng
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 80 (05) : 639 - 647
  • [24] Immature Platelet Fraction and Acute Coronary Syndrome; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Afshar, Elmira Jafari
    Shahnavaz, Vahid
    Talakoob, Hamed
    Kafialqora, Parnaz
    Madady, Aryan
    Pourbahrighesmat, Shamimeh
    Tayebi, Amirhossein
    Mozafarybazargany, Mohammadhossein
    Gholami, Niloofar
    Ayati, Aryan
    Samimisedeh, Parham
    Rastad, Hadith
    Karim, Hossein
    ARCHIVES OF ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 12 (01)
  • [25] Anticoagulation versus Antiplatelets in Coronary Artery Ectasia and Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Pastrana, Sarai Hernandez
    Doma, Mohamed
    Fatima, Syeda Rubab
    Hemdanieh, Maya
    Kritya, Mangesh
    Huang, Wilbert
    Naji, Zahra
    Lingamsetty, Shanmukh Sai Pavan
    Gewehr, Douglas Mesadri
    Esparza, Ximena Latapi Ruiz
    Martignoni, Felipe
    Araiza, Diego
    CIRCULATION, 2024, 150
  • [26] External Validation of the Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes Decision Rule
    Carlton, Edward
    Body, Richard
    Greaves, Kim
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 23 (02) : 136 - 143
  • [27] C-Reactive Protein and Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Correia, Luis C. L.
    Pericles Esteves, J.
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2011, 97 (01)
  • [28] Prognostic value of elevated lipoprotein (a) in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Guochun
    Xia, Maoyin
    Liang, Cai
    Pu, Feng
    Liu, Sitai
    Jia, Dongxia
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [29] PREVALENCE AND CLINICAL IMPACT OF THROMBOCYTOPENIA IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Discepola, Vanessa
    Schnitzer, Mireille
    Jolicoeur, E. Marc
    Rousseau, Guy
    Lordkipanidze, Marie
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (11) : 1349 - 1349
  • [30] Body mass index and mortality after acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lamelas, Pablo M.
    Maheer, Khan
    Schwalm, Jon-David
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA, 2017, 72 (06) : 655 - 661