Performance of Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes decision rules in acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Dizaji, Shayan Roshdi [1 ]
Ahmadzadeh, Koohyar [1 ]
Zarei, Hamed [1 ]
Miri, Reza [2 ]
Yousefifard, Mahmoud [1 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Med Sci, Physiol Res Ctr, Hemmat Highway,POB 14665354, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Prevent Cardiovasc Dis Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
acute coronary syndrome; decision support techniques; diagnosis; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL RISK SCORES; CHEST-PAIN; SYNDROMES MACS; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; AID; DERIVATION; BIOMARKER;
D O I
10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001147
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Multiple decision-aiding models are available to help physicians identify acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and accelerate the decision-making process in emergency departments (EDs). This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of the Manchester Acute Coronary Syndrome (MACS) rule and its derivations, enhancing the evidence for their clinical use. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception until October 2023 for studies including adult ED patients with suspected cardiac chest pain and inconclusive findings requiring ACS risk-stratification. The predictive value of MACS, Troponin-only MACS (T-MACS), or History and Electrocardiogram-only MACS (HE-MACS) decision aids for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and 30-day major adverse cardiac outcomes (MACEs) among patients admitted to ED with chest pain suspected of ACS. Overall sensitivity and specificity were synthesized using the 'Diagma' package in STATA statistical software. Applicability and risk of bias assessment were performed using the QUADAS-2 tool. For AMI detection, MACS has a sensitivity of 99% [confidence interval (CI): 97-100], specificity of 19% (CI: 10-32), and AUC of 0.816 (CI: 0.720-0.885). T-MACS shows a sensitivity of 98% (CI: 98-99), specificity of 35% (CI: 29-42), and AUC of 0.859 (CI: 0.824-0.887). HE-MACS exhibits a sensitivity of 99% (CI: 98-100), specificity of 9% (CI: 3-21), and AUC of 0.787 (CI: 0.647-0.882). For MACE detection, MACS demonstrates a sensitivity of 98% (CI: 94-100), specificity of 22% (CI: 10-42), and AUC of 0.804 (CI: 0.659-0.897). T-MACS displays a sensitivity of 96% (CI: 94-98), specificity of 36% (CI: 30-43), and AUC of 0.792 (CI: 0.748-0.830). HE-MACS maintains a sensitivity of 99% (CI: 97-99), specificity of 10% (CI 6-16), and AUC of 0.713 (CI: 0.625-0.787). Of all the MACS models, T-MACS displayed the highest overall accuracy due to its high sensitivity and significantly superior specificity. T-MACS exhibits very good diagnostic performance in predicting both AMI and MACE. This makes it a highly promising tool for managing patients with acute chest pain.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 323
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Value of Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes Decision Rule in the Detection of Acute Coronary Syndrome; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ramezani, Fatemeh
    Ahmadi, Sajjad
    Faridaalaee, Gholamreza
    Baratloo, Alireza
    Yousefifard, Mahmoud
    EMERGENCY, 2018, 6 (01):
  • [2] THE (TROPONIN) - MANCHESTER ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME RULES IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    McDowell, Garry
    McMullen, Amy
    Al-Mashali, Malak
    Austin, Catrin
    Dempsey-Hibbert, Nina
    Stout, Martin
    Slevin, Mark
    Body, Richard
    HEART, 2020, 106 : A31 - A32
  • [3] Anemia and mortality in acute coronary syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lawler, Patrick R.
    Filion, Kristian B.
    Dourian, Tara
    Atallah, Renee
    Garfinkle, Michael
    Eisenberg, Mark J.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 165 (02) : 143 - +
  • [4] Anaemia and Prognosis in Acute Coronary Syndromes: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Liu, Y.
    Yang, Y. M.
    Zhu, J.
    Tan, H. Q.
    Liang, Y.
    Li, J. D.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 40 (01) : 43 - 55
  • [5] Morphine in acute coronary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Duarte, Goncalo Silva
    Nunes-Ferreira, Afonso
    Rodrigues, Filipe Brogueira
    Pinto, Fausto J.
    Ferreira, Joaquim J.
    Costa, Joao
    Caldeira, Daniel
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (03):
  • [6] Extracorporeal Circulatory Support in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Pavasini, Rita
    Cirillo, Chiara
    Campo, Gianluca
    Menezes, Miguel Nobre
    Biscaglia, Simone
    Tonet, Elisabetta
    Ferrari, Roberto
    Patel, Brijesh V.
    Price, Susanna
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (11) : E1173 - E1183
  • [7] Chemerin Levels in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ismaiel, Abdulrahman
    Ashfaq, Mohammad Zeeshan
    Leucuta, Daniel-Corneliu
    Ismaiel, Mohamed
    Ensar Ismaiel, Dilara
    Popa, Stefan-Lucian
    Dumitrascu, Dan L.
    LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2022, 53 (06) : 552 - 560
  • [8] CAN THE MANCHESTER ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES AND TROPONIN-ONLY MANCHESTER ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES DECISION AIDS RULE OUT ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT?
    Reynard, Charles
    Ismail, Husam
    Hadden, Nicholas
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2017, 34 (12) : 852 - +
  • [9] Anticoagulation Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yousaf, Amman
    Ahsan, Muhammad J.
    Ahmad, Soban
    Latif, Azka
    Ahsan, Muhammad Zoraiz
    Qavi, Ahmed
    Ghali, Magdi G.
    Ardhanari, Sivakumar
    Goldsweig, Andrew M.
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [10] Estimating the prevalence of depression in people with acute coronary syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dong, Zheng
    Yang, Qianfang
    Chen, Huijun
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (17) : E37906