A Framework for Assessing Innovations, Business Models and Sustainability for Software Companies Using Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making

被引:0
|
作者
Torbacki, Witold [1 ]
机构
[1] Maritime Univ Szczecin, Fac Econ & Transport Engn, PL-70507 Szczecin, Poland
关键词
sustainable innovations; business models; hybrid MCDM; software companies; virtualization and dockerization; DEVELOPMENT GOALS; BIG DATA; DEMATEL; PERSPECTIVE; PERFORMANCE; MATURITY; SYSTEMS; DESIGN; SMES;
D O I
10.3390/su16145871
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The management staff of software companies are constantly looking for ways to build market advantage and win business strategies. Introducing changes in companies is a costly process and carries the risk of poor allocation of resources. This article provides decision-makers with a tool that increases the chance of making the right business decisions and can also be a guide in the transformation of business models. The scientific aim of this article was to simultaneously cover three areas, innovation, business models, and sustainable development, to develop a scheme enabling the construction of rankings of the elements of these areas in a version dedicated to software producing companies. Rankings, which are built using the hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method, indicate to decision-makers the need for building strategic development plans, which aspects are the most important, and what the order of possible implementations should be. Based on a multi-criteria analysis, it was found that (i) in terms of innovation, companies should focus their attention first on implementing product, process, and technological innovations; (ii) within innovative business models, attempts should be made to produce IT systems using virtualization and dockerization, as well as efforts should be made to closely bind customers with the offered products and services and offer temporary rental of IT systems instead of classic licenses; and (iii) in the context of the classic three levels of sustainable development, companies should focus primarily on economic and financial issues.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SPECIAL ISSUE - MULTIPLE-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING - EDITORIAL
    KERSTEN, G
    MICHALOWSKI, W
    INFOR, 1992, 30 (02) : 65 - 67
  • [22] Research Agenda on Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making: New Academic Debates in Business and Management
    Castello-Sirvent, Fernando
    Meneses-Eraso, Carlos
    AXIOMS, 2022, 11 (10)
  • [23] Business Research Planning Using Quantitative Multiple-Criteria Decision Making Approach
    Sauian, Mohd Sahar
    Hashim, Haruizwan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2010, : 496 - 502
  • [24] Identifying Critical Risk Factors in Green Product Certification Using Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making
    Zhang, Changlu
    Zhang, Jian
    Yang, Qiong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (08)
  • [25] A Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Photovoltaic Solar Plant Location Selection
    Lee, Amy H. I.
    Kang, He-Yau
    Liou, You-Jyun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (02)
  • [26] A multiple-criteria decision-making model for the selection of a hotel location
    Popovic, Gabrijela
    Stanujkic, Dragisa
    Brzakovic, Miodrag
    Karabasevic, Darjan
    LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 84 : 49 - 58
  • [27] A Framework for Triangular Fuzzy Random Multiple-Criteria Decision Making
    Zhen-Song Chen
    Kwai-Sang Chin
    Yan-Lai Li
    International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2016, 18 : 227 - 247
  • [28] A Framework for Triangular Fuzzy Random Multiple-Criteria Decision Making
    Chen, Zhen-Song
    Chin, Kwai-Sang
    Li, Yan-Lai
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2016, 18 (02) : 227 - 247
  • [29] RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN OUR APPROACH TO MULTIPLE-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    ZIONTS, S
    WALLENIUS, J
    LECTURE NOTES IN ECONOMICS AND MATHEMATICAL SYSTEMS, 1984, 229 : 54 - 62
  • [30] Communicating preferences in multiple-criteria decision-making: the role of the designer
    Sen, P
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2001, 12 (01) : 15 - 24