A Framework for Assessing Innovations, Business Models and Sustainability for Software Companies Using Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making

被引:0
|
作者
Torbacki, Witold [1 ]
机构
[1] Maritime Univ Szczecin, Fac Econ & Transport Engn, PL-70507 Szczecin, Poland
关键词
sustainable innovations; business models; hybrid MCDM; software companies; virtualization and dockerization; DEVELOPMENT GOALS; BIG DATA; DEMATEL; PERSPECTIVE; PERFORMANCE; MATURITY; SYSTEMS; DESIGN; SMES;
D O I
10.3390/su16145871
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The management staff of software companies are constantly looking for ways to build market advantage and win business strategies. Introducing changes in companies is a costly process and carries the risk of poor allocation of resources. This article provides decision-makers with a tool that increases the chance of making the right business decisions and can also be a guide in the transformation of business models. The scientific aim of this article was to simultaneously cover three areas, innovation, business models, and sustainable development, to develop a scheme enabling the construction of rankings of the elements of these areas in a version dedicated to software producing companies. Rankings, which are built using the hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method, indicate to decision-makers the need for building strategic development plans, which aspects are the most important, and what the order of possible implementations should be. Based on a multi-criteria analysis, it was found that (i) in terms of innovation, companies should focus their attention first on implementing product, process, and technological innovations; (ii) within innovative business models, attempts should be made to produce IT systems using virtualization and dockerization, as well as efforts should be made to closely bind customers with the offered products and services and offer temporary rental of IT systems instead of classic licenses; and (iii) in the context of the classic three levels of sustainable development, companies should focus primarily on economic and financial issues.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multiple-criteria decision-making model for evaluating sustainability of business enterprises
    Rathviboon, S. (san.rathviboon@ait.ac.th), 1600, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd., 29, route de Pre-Bois, Case Postale 856, CH-1215 Geneva 15, CH-1215, Switzerland (14):
  • [2] Business Sustainability Performance Evaluation for Taiwanese BanksA Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
    Lin, Arthur Jin
    Chang, Hai-Yen
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (08):
  • [3] Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making for Assessing the Enhanced Geothermal Systems
    Raos, Sara
    Ilak, Perica
    Rajsl, Ivan
    Bilic, Tena
    Trullenque, Ghislain
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (09)
  • [4] Assessing the Circular Economy in Regions of Chile by Using Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM)
    Komasi, Hossein
    Yazdi, Amir Karbassi
    Sani, Mohammad Eskandari
    Tan, Yong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (01)
  • [5] A framework for dynamic multiple-criteria decision making
    Campanella, Gianluca
    Ribeiro, Rita A.
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2011, 52 (01) : 52 - 60
  • [6] A ranking method for multiple-criteria decision-making
    Borgulya, I
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 1997, 28 (09) : 905 - 912
  • [7] Navigating the Complexity of HRM Practice: A Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Framework
    Mircetic, Vuk
    Popovic, Gabrijela
    Vukotic, Svetlana
    Mihic, Marko
    Kovacevic, Ivana
    Dokovic, Aleksandar
    Slavkovic, Marko
    MATHEMATICS, 2024, 12 (23)
  • [8] Hybrid multiple-criteria decision-making methods: A review of applications in engineering
    Zavadskas, E. K.
    Antucheviciene, J.
    Turskis, Z.
    Adeli, H.
    SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2016, 23 (01) : 1 - 20
  • [9] MULTIPLE-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING - A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS
    HAIMES, YY
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1985, 15 (03): : 313 - 315