Effect of Tomato Juice and Different Drying Methods on Selected Properties of Courgette

被引:0
|
作者
Krecisz, Magdalena [1 ]
Stepien, Bogdan [1 ]
Pikor, Karol [1 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Univ Environm & Life Sci, Inst Agr Engn, Chelmonskiego St 37a, PL-51630 Wroclaw, Poland
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 16期
关键词
drying; vacuum impregnation; courgette; kinetics; color; VGI; density; KINETICS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.3390/app14167105
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of vacuum impregnation on selected physical properties of courgettes, the drying process, and kinetics of the drying process. Vacuum impregnation was used as a pretreatment in the conducted research. The drying process was carried out using three techniques (convection drying, freeze drying, and vacuum drying). In the presented work, selected properties of courgettes, i.e., water activity, dry weight, density, VGI, shrinkage, and color were investigated, and the best model describing the kinetics of the drying process was selected. As a result of the study, it was found that the pretreated courgette was characterized by increased dry matter (0.44% to 4.08%) and density content (15.52% to 33.78%) and reduced or increasing water activity (-5.08 to 38.62%) depending on the drying method. The process also resulted in reduced drying shrinkage (-2.13% to -6.97%). Tomato juice was used as an impregnating solution, resulting in an increase in red intensity (8.44) and a decrease in the L* color index (80.16 to 58.00 for the fresh courgette). Dries with the most favorable properties were obtained using the freeze-drying method. The best model of the drying process kinetics was the logistic model.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A STUDY OF METHODS FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF TOMATO JUICE COLOR
    ROBINSON, WB
    WISHNETSKY, T
    RANSFORD, JR
    CLARK, WL
    HAND, DB
    FOOD TECHNOLOGY, 1952, 6 (07) : 269 - 275
  • [42] Effect of drying methods and maltodextrin concentration on pigment content of watermelon juice powder
    Oberoi, Davinder Pal Singh
    Sogi, Dalbir Singh
    JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING, 2015, 165 : 172 - 178
  • [43] EFFECT OF TOMATO CELL STRUCTURES ON CONSISTENCY OF TOMATO JUICE
    WHITTENBERGER, RT
    NUTTING, GC
    FOOD TECHNOLOGY, 1957, 11 (01) : 19 - 22
  • [44] Investigation of Effect of Different Concentration Methods on Physicochemical Properties, Phenolic Compounds and Anthocyanins of Barberry Juice
    Kavian, Fatemeh
    Nateghi, Leila
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING-INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH EDITION, 2024, 43 (06): : 2295 - 2305
  • [45] Effect of Different Drying Methods on PPESK Carbon Membrane
    Pang Jing
    Wang Tong-Hua
    Li Lin
    Qi Wen-Bo
    Cao Yi-Ming
    JOURNAL OF INORGANIC MATERIALS, 2011, 26 (02) : 165 - 169
  • [46] Effect of different drying methods on the aromatic compositions in raisin
    Zhang Junsong
    Xu Xiaobo
    Mao Duobin
    Yang Gongming
    Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Viticulture and Enology, 2007, : 258 - 263
  • [47] Effect of Different Drying Methods on the Quality of Oudemansiella raphanipes
    Hou, Shuting
    Zhang, Defang
    Yu, Dongmei
    Li, Hao
    Xu, Yaping
    Wang, Wuxia
    Li, Ruiting
    Feng, Cuiping
    Meng, Junlong
    Xu, Lijing
    Cheng, Yanfen
    Chang, Mingchang
    Geng, Xueran
    FOODS, 2024, 13 (07)
  • [48] Effect of different drying methods on quality of lotus seeds
    Zhou, Mingqian
    Liu, Chunquan
    Li, Dajing
    Shipin Kexue/Food Science, 2016, 37 (09): : 98 - 104
  • [49] Impact of different pre-treatments and drying methods on the physicochemical properties, bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of different tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cultivars
    Nzimande, Nokuthula Abegale
    Mianda, Sephora Mutombo
    Seke, Faith
    Sivakumar, Dharini
    LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 207
  • [50] Effect of different drying methods on drying characteristics and quality of Camellia oleifera seeds
    Wang, Fenghe
    Shao, Wenhui
    Yang, Deyong
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROCESSING AND PRESERVATION, 2021, 45 (12)