Assessment of obstetric characteristics and outcomes associated with pregnancy with Turner syndrome

被引:0
|
作者
Anderson, Zachary S. [1 ]
Masjedi, Aaron D. [1 ]
Aberle, Laurel S. [1 ]
Mandelbaum, Rachel S. [2 ]
V. Erickson, Katherine [1 ,3 ]
Matsuzaki, Shinya [4 ]
Brueggmann, Doerthe [5 ]
Paulson, Richard J. [2 ]
Ouzounian, Joseph G. [6 ]
Matsuo, Koji [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, 2020 Zonal Ave,IRD520, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Reprod Endocrinol & Infertil, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Osaka Int Canc Inst, Dept Gynecol, Osaka, Japan
[5] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Sch Med, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Div Obstet & Perinatal Med, Frankfurt, Germany
[6] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[7] Univ Southern Calif, Norris Comprehens Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
Pregnancy; Turner syndrome; trend; characteristics; outcomes; OOCYTE DONATION; WOMEN; FERTILITY; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.03.019
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess national-level trends, characteristics, and outcomes of pregnancies with Turner syndrome in the United States. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample. Subjects: A total of 17,865,495 hospital deliveries from 2016-2020. - 2020. Exposure: A diagnosis of Turner syndrome, identified fi ed according to the World Health Organization's International Classification fi cation of Disease 10th revision code of Q96. Main Outcome Measures: Obstetrics outcomes related to Turner syndrome, assessed with inverse probability of treatment weighting cohort and multivariable binary logistic regression modeling. Results: The prevalence of pregnant patients with Turner syndrome was 7.0 per 100,000 deliveries (one in 14,235). The number of hospital deliveries with patients who have a diagnosis of Turner syndrome increased from 5.0 to 11.7 per 100,000 deliveries during the study period (adjusted-odds ratio [aOR] for 2020 vs. 2016; 2.18, 95% confidence fi dence interval [CI] 1.83-2.60). - 2.60). Pregnant patients with Turner syndrome were more likely to have a diagnosis of pregestational hypertension (4.8% vs. 2.8%; aOR 1.65; 95% CI 1.26-2.15), - 2.15), uterine anomaly (1.6% vs. 0.4%; aOR, 3.01; 95% CI 1.93-4.69), - 4.69), and prior pregnancy losses (1.6% vs. 0.3%; aOR 4.70; 95% CI 3.01-7.32) - 7.32) compared with those without Turner syndrome. For the index obstetric characteristics, Turner syndrome was associated with an increased risk of intrauterine fetal demise (10.9% vs. 0.7%; aOR 8.40; 95% CI 5.30-13.30), - 13.30), intrauterine growth restriction (8.5% vs. 3.5%; aOR 2.11; 95% CI 1.48-2.99), - 2.99), and placenta accreta spectrum (aOR 3.63; 95% CI 1.20-10.97). - 10.97). For delivery outcome, pregnant patients with Turner syndrome were more likely to undergo cesarean delivery (41.6% vs. 32.3%; aOR 1.53; 95% CI 1.26-1.87). - 1.87). Moreover, the odds of periviable delivery (22-25 - 25 weeks: 6.1% vs. 0.4%; aOR 5.88; 95% CI 3.47-9.98) - 9.98) and previable delivery (<22 < 22 weeks: 3.3% vs. 0.3%; aOR 2.87; 95% CI 1.45-5.69) - 5.69) were increased compared with those without Turner syndrome. Conclusions: The results of contemporaneous, nationwide assessment in the United States suggest that although pregnancy with Turner syndrome is uncommon this may represent a high-risk group, particularly for intrauterine fetal demise and periviable delivery. Establishing a society-based approach for preconception counseling and antenatal follow-up would be clinically compelling. (c) 2024 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 242
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Falling Insulin Requirements in Late Pregnancy Is Associated with Adverse Obstetric Outcomes
    Padmanabhan, Suja
    Mclean, Mark
    Cheung, Wah
    DIABETES, 2014, 63 : A341 - A341
  • [32] Adnexal Torsion in Pregnancy Managed by Laparoscopy Is Associated with Favorable Obstetric Outcomes
    Dvash, Shira
    Pekar, Marina
    Melcer, Yaakov
    Weiner, Yifat
    Vaknin, Zvi
    Smorgick, Noam
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 27 (06) : 1295 - 1299
  • [33] Characteristics and Outcomes Associated with Hepatic Infarction in Pregnancy
    Gray, Jordan
    Fresquez, Arianna
    Ireland, Kayla E.
    Boyd, Angela R.
    Roman, Tania
    Ramsey, Patrick S.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 131 : 55S - 56S
  • [34] Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: the influence of triple positivity antibodies profile on pregnancy outcomes
    Latino, J. O.
    Fernandez, R. D.
    Sebastian, U.
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2015, 135 : S84 - S84
  • [35] Pravastatin improves pregnancy outcomes in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome refractory to antithrombotic therapy
    Lefkou, Eleftheria
    Mamopoulos, Apostolos
    Dagklis, Themistoklis
    Vosnakis, Christos
    Rousso, David
    Girardi, Guillermina
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2016, 126 (08): : 2933 - 2940
  • [36] OUTCOME OF SPONTANEOUS PREGNANCY IN TURNER SYNDROME
    Gorduza, V.
    Petrariu, F. D.
    ACTA ENDOCRINOLOGICA-BUCHAREST, 2015, 11 (03) : 348 - 355
  • [37] Turner syndrome and pregnancy: A multidisciplinary approach
    Alvarez, Ruth
    Luisa Rodriguez, Maria
    Martin, Maria
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2018, 37 (11) : 951 - 951
  • [38] Thrombocytopenia in the first trimester predicts adverse pregnancy outcomes in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome
    Jin, Jiayang
    Xu, Xue
    Hou, Lei
    Hou, Yuke
    Li, Jing
    Liang, Meiying
    Li, Chun
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [39] Reproductive and obstetric outcomes in mosaic Turner's Syndrome: a cross-sectional study and review of the literature
    Doger, Emek
    Cakiroglu, Yigit
    Ceylan, Yasin
    Ulak, Esen
    Ozdamar, Ozkan
    Caliskan, Eray
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2015, 13
  • [40] Reproductive and obstetric outcomes in mosaic Turner’s Syndrome: a cross-sectional study and review of the literature
    Emek Doğer
    Yiğit Çakıroğlu
    Yasin Ceylan
    Esen Ulak
    Özkan Özdamar
    Eray Çalışkan
    Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 13