Assessment of obstetric characteristics and outcomes associated with pregnancy with Turner syndrome

被引:0
|
作者
Anderson, Zachary S. [1 ]
Masjedi, Aaron D. [1 ]
Aberle, Laurel S. [1 ]
Mandelbaum, Rachel S. [2 ]
V. Erickson, Katherine [1 ,3 ]
Matsuzaki, Shinya [4 ]
Brueggmann, Doerthe [5 ]
Paulson, Richard J. [2 ]
Ouzounian, Joseph G. [6 ]
Matsuo, Koji [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, 2020 Zonal Ave,IRD520, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Reprod Endocrinol & Infertil, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Osaka Int Canc Inst, Dept Gynecol, Osaka, Japan
[5] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Sch Med, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Div Obstet & Perinatal Med, Frankfurt, Germany
[6] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[7] Univ Southern Calif, Norris Comprehens Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
Pregnancy; Turner syndrome; trend; characteristics; outcomes; OOCYTE DONATION; WOMEN; FERTILITY; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.03.019
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess national-level trends, characteristics, and outcomes of pregnancies with Turner syndrome in the United States. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample. Subjects: A total of 17,865,495 hospital deliveries from 2016-2020. - 2020. Exposure: A diagnosis of Turner syndrome, identified fi ed according to the World Health Organization's International Classification fi cation of Disease 10th revision code of Q96. Main Outcome Measures: Obstetrics outcomes related to Turner syndrome, assessed with inverse probability of treatment weighting cohort and multivariable binary logistic regression modeling. Results: The prevalence of pregnant patients with Turner syndrome was 7.0 per 100,000 deliveries (one in 14,235). The number of hospital deliveries with patients who have a diagnosis of Turner syndrome increased from 5.0 to 11.7 per 100,000 deliveries during the study period (adjusted-odds ratio [aOR] for 2020 vs. 2016; 2.18, 95% confidence fi dence interval [CI] 1.83-2.60). - 2.60). Pregnant patients with Turner syndrome were more likely to have a diagnosis of pregestational hypertension (4.8% vs. 2.8%; aOR 1.65; 95% CI 1.26-2.15), - 2.15), uterine anomaly (1.6% vs. 0.4%; aOR, 3.01; 95% CI 1.93-4.69), - 4.69), and prior pregnancy losses (1.6% vs. 0.3%; aOR 4.70; 95% CI 3.01-7.32) - 7.32) compared with those without Turner syndrome. For the index obstetric characteristics, Turner syndrome was associated with an increased risk of intrauterine fetal demise (10.9% vs. 0.7%; aOR 8.40; 95% CI 5.30-13.30), - 13.30), intrauterine growth restriction (8.5% vs. 3.5%; aOR 2.11; 95% CI 1.48-2.99), - 2.99), and placenta accreta spectrum (aOR 3.63; 95% CI 1.20-10.97). - 10.97). For delivery outcome, pregnant patients with Turner syndrome were more likely to undergo cesarean delivery (41.6% vs. 32.3%; aOR 1.53; 95% CI 1.26-1.87). - 1.87). Moreover, the odds of periviable delivery (22-25 - 25 weeks: 6.1% vs. 0.4%; aOR 5.88; 95% CI 3.47-9.98) - 9.98) and previable delivery (<22 < 22 weeks: 3.3% vs. 0.3%; aOR 2.87; 95% CI 1.45-5.69) - 5.69) were increased compared with those without Turner syndrome. Conclusions: The results of contemporaneous, nationwide assessment in the United States suggest that although pregnancy with Turner syndrome is uncommon this may represent a high-risk group, particularly for intrauterine fetal demise and periviable delivery. Establishing a society-based approach for preconception counseling and antenatal follow-up would be clinically compelling. (c) 2024 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 242
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Spontaneous fertility and pregnancy outcomes amongst 480 women with Turner syndrome
    Bernard, Valerie
    Donadille, Bruno
    Zenaty, Delphine
    Courtillot, Carine
    Salenave, Sylvie
    de la Perriere, Aude Brac
    Albarel, Frederique
    Fevre, Anne
    Kerlan, Veronique
    Brue, Thierry
    Delemer, Brigitte
    Borson-Chazot, Francoise
    Carel, Jean-Claude
    Chanson, Philippe
    Leger, Juliane
    Touraine, Philippe
    Christin-Maitre, Sophie
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 (04) : 782 - 788
  • [22] Fertility and Pregnancy in Turner Syndrome
    Bouet, Pierre-Emmanuel
    Godbout, Ariane
    El Hachem, Hady
    Lefebvre, Maude
    Berube, Lyne
    Dionne, Marie-Danielle
    Kamga-Ngande, Carole
    Lapensee, Louise
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2016, 38 (08) : 712 - 718
  • [23] Hydroxychloroquine: Improving pregnancy outcomes in refractory obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome (OAPS)
    Gerde, Mariela
    Heer, Carolina
    Alvarez, Romina
    Fernandez Suarez, Catalina
    Ercilia Ibarra, Maria
    Iglesias, Micaela
    LUPUS, 2019, 28 : 12 - 13
  • [24] Hydroxychloroquine: improving pregnancy outcomes in refractory obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS)
    Gerde, M.
    Heer, C.
    Alvarez, R.
    Fernandez Suarez, C.
    Ibarra, E.
    Iglesias, M.
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2019, 175 : S19 - S19
  • [25] Obstetric Outcomes of Pregnancy Complicated by Marfan Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Clennon, Emily
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Teton, Zoe
    Shaffer, Brian
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 : 48S - 49S
  • [26] Pregnancy outcomes in women with Turner syndrome followed at Massachusetts General Hospital: promoting a healthy pregnancy
    Rivera-Cruz, Greysha
    Zito, Antonino
    Snyder, Emma
    Levitsky, Lynne
    Hayes, Frances
    Souter, Irene
    Lin, Angela
    MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM, 2021, 132 : S61 - S62
  • [27] Increased maternal cardiovascular mortality associated with pregnancy in women with Turner syndrome
    不详
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 90 : S185 - S186
  • [30] Obstetric Outcomes in Women With Turner Karyotype EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Hagman, A.
    Kallen, K.
    Barrenas, M-L
    Landin-Wilhelmsen, K.
    Hanson, C.
    Bryman, I.
    Wennerholm, U-B
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2012, 67 (04) : 228 - 229