Interference screw versus suture button fixation for tibialis anterior tendon transfer: a biomechanical analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Meyer, Zachary [1 ]
Bohl, Daniel [2 ]
Zide, Jacob [3 ]
Pierce, William [4 ]
Niese, Brad [4 ]
Shivers, Claire [4 ]
Polk, Jordan [4 ]
Kannan, Yassine [4 ]
Riccio, Anthony I. [4 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Orthopaediatr Surg, Med Ctr, St Louis, MO USA
[2] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Dallas, TX USA
[4] Scottish Rite Children, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Dallas, TX USA
来源
关键词
clubfoot; interference screw; lateral cuneiform; recurrence; suture button; tibialis anterior tendon transfer;
D O I
10.1097/BPB.0000000000001131
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Tibialis anterior tendon (TAT) transfer to the lateral cuneiform is commonly utilized to treat dynamic supination for relapsed clubfoot deformity. Traditional suture button fixation (SBF) may lead to skin necrosis at the button/skin interface. While interference screw fixation (ISF) would mitigate this concern, this fixation method has not been investigated in clubfoot patients. This study aims to investigate the performance of ISF versus SBF for TAT transfer in a cadaveric model. Ten matched pairs of cadaveric feet were obtained. One of each matched specimen underwent TAT transfer to the lateral cuneiform using ISF and the other underwent TAT transfer using SBF. For each ISF specimen, the tension of the transferred TAT required to bring the ankle to neutral was measured. This tension was then applied to both matched specimens using an MTS machine. Tension dissipation was measured after a 20-minute interval. In specimens with SBF, a load cell was positioned between the plantar skin and suture button to determine plantar skin pressure at the time of initial tension application. Average tension necessary to achieve neutral dorsiflexion was 49.4 N. Average tension dissipation after 20 min was significantly less in the IFS group (20 N versus 23.6 N, P = 0.02). No fixation failures occurred in either group. Average plantar foot skin pressure was 196.5 mmHg at initial tension application, exceeding thresholds for tissue ischemia. ISF allows for tendon tensioning at forces beyond those expected to result in skin necrosis with SBF with less dissipation of tension over time.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 506
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF BONE SUTURE ANCHOR TO BONE TUNNEL FIXATION OF TIBIALIS ANTERIOR TENDON IN CADAVERIC CUBOID BONE - A BIOMECHANICAL INVESTIGATION
    FENNELL, CW
    BALLARD, JM
    PFLASTER, DS
    ADKINS, RH
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 16 (10) : 641 - 645
  • [32] Screw fixation versus suture-button fixation for the Latarjet procedure-a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rossi, Luciano A.
    Pasqualini, Ignacio
    Frangiamore, Salvatore J.
    Anakwenze, Oke
    Dickens, Jonathan
    Klifto, Christopher
    Hurley, Eoghan
    SHOULDER & ELBOW, 2025, 17 (01) : 14 - 21
  • [33] Biomechanical Evaluation of a Unicortical Button Versus Interference Screw for Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis
    Arora, Amarpal S.
    Singh, Anshu
    Koonce, Ryan C.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2013, 29 (04): : 638 - 644
  • [34] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Syndesmotic Screw Versus Suture Button Fixation in Tibiofibular Syndesmotic Injuries
    Ramsey, Duncan C.
    Friess, Darin M.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2018, 32 (06) : E198 - E203
  • [35] Biomechanical Comparison of Interference Screw and Cortical Button With Screw Hybrid Technique for Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon Repair
    Arianjam, Afshin
    Camisa, William
    Leasure, Jeremi M.
    Montgomery, William H.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2013, 36 (11) : E1371 - E1377
  • [36] Interference Screw versus Cement Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Soft Tissue Grafts: A Biomechanical Study
    Patel, Jay
    Kadkoy, Yazan
    Helbig, Thomas
    Rupani, Mohammed
    Cuppari, Nicholas
    Cortes, Ricardo
    Wetterstrand, Charlene
    Lu, Michael T.
    Paglia, David N.
    Galdi, Balazs
    Beiro, Cristobal
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2024, 37 (04) : 326 - 332
  • [37] Biomechanical Comparison of Epiphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Fixation Using a Cortical Button Construct Versus an Interference Screw and Sheath Construct in Skeletally Immature Cadaveric Specimens
    Dukas, Alex G.
    Shea, Kevin G.
    Nissen, Carl W.
    Obopilwe, Elifho
    Fabricant, Peter D.
    Cannamela, Peter C.
    Milewski, Matthew D.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (06):
  • [38] A Comparison Between a Retrograde Interference Screw, Suture Button, and Combined Fixation on the Tibial Side in an All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction A Biomechanical Study in a Porcine Model
    Walsh, Michael P.
    Wijdicks, Coen A.
    Parker, Josh B.
    Hapa, Onur
    LaPrade, Robert F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (01): : 160 - 167
  • [39] Suture anchor versus suture through tunnel fixation for quadriceps tendon rupture: A biomechanical study
    Lighthart, William A.
    Cohen, David A.
    Levine, Richard G.
    Parks, Brent G.
    Boucher, Henry R.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2008, 31 (05) : 441 - 441
  • [40] Effects of Tunnel Dilation and Interference Screw Position on the Biomechanical Properties of Tendon Graft Fixation for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Higano, Masanori
    Tachibana, Yomei
    Sakaguchi, Katunobu
    Goto, Tatsuru
    Oda, Hiromi
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2013, 29 (11): : 1804 - 1810