Interference screw versus suture button fixation for tibialis anterior tendon transfer: a biomechanical analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Meyer, Zachary [1 ]
Bohl, Daniel [2 ]
Zide, Jacob [3 ]
Pierce, William [4 ]
Niese, Brad [4 ]
Shivers, Claire [4 ]
Polk, Jordan [4 ]
Kannan, Yassine [4 ]
Riccio, Anthony I. [4 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Orthopaediatr Surg, Med Ctr, St Louis, MO USA
[2] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Dallas, TX USA
[4] Scottish Rite Children, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Dallas, TX USA
来源
关键词
clubfoot; interference screw; lateral cuneiform; recurrence; suture button; tibialis anterior tendon transfer;
D O I
10.1097/BPB.0000000000001131
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Tibialis anterior tendon (TAT) transfer to the lateral cuneiform is commonly utilized to treat dynamic supination for relapsed clubfoot deformity. Traditional suture button fixation (SBF) may lead to skin necrosis at the button/skin interface. While interference screw fixation (ISF) would mitigate this concern, this fixation method has not been investigated in clubfoot patients. This study aims to investigate the performance of ISF versus SBF for TAT transfer in a cadaveric model. Ten matched pairs of cadaveric feet were obtained. One of each matched specimen underwent TAT transfer to the lateral cuneiform using ISF and the other underwent TAT transfer using SBF. For each ISF specimen, the tension of the transferred TAT required to bring the ankle to neutral was measured. This tension was then applied to both matched specimens using an MTS machine. Tension dissipation was measured after a 20-minute interval. In specimens with SBF, a load cell was positioned between the plantar skin and suture button to determine plantar skin pressure at the time of initial tension application. Average tension necessary to achieve neutral dorsiflexion was 49.4 N. Average tension dissipation after 20 min was significantly less in the IFS group (20 N versus 23.6 N, P = 0.02). No fixation failures occurred in either group. Average plantar foot skin pressure was 196.5 mmHg at initial tension application, exceeding thresholds for tissue ischemia. ISF allows for tendon tensioning at forces beyond those expected to result in skin necrosis with SBF with less dissipation of tension over time.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 506
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biomechanical evaluation of distal biceps reconstruction with cortical button and interference screw fixation
    Sethi, Paul
    Obopilwe, Elifho
    Rincon, Lina
    Miller, Seth
    Mazzocca, Augustus
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2010, 19 (01) : 53 - 57
  • [22] Pectoralis major tendon repair: a biomechanical study of suture button versus transosseous suture techniques
    William Thomas
    Sabina Gheduzzi
    Iain Packham
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2015, 23 : 2617 - 2623
  • [23] Cortical suture button fixation vs. bicortical screw fixation in the Latarjet procedure: a biomechanical comparison
    Williams, Robert C.
    Morris, Randal P.
    El Beaino, Marc
    Maassen, Nicholas H.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2020, 29 (07) : 1470 - 1478
  • [24] TIBIALIS ANTERIOR TENDON TRANSFER
    DAYMOND, KR
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1982, 64 (01): : 126 - 126
  • [25] Interference Screw Versus Suture Anchors for Femoral Fixation in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study
    Gould, Heath P.
    Delaney, Nicholas R.
    Parks, Brent G.
    Melvani, Roshan T.
    Hinton, Richard Y.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (03)
  • [26] Suture Button versus Screw Fixation for Distal Tibiofibular Injury and Expected Value Decision Analysis
    Schulte, Spencer S.
    Oplinger, Scott L.
    Graver, Hunter R.
    Bockelman, Kyle J.
    Frost, Landon S.
    Orr, Justin D.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (11)
  • [27] Interference Screw Versus Suture Anchor Fixation for Subpectoral Tenodesis of the Proximal Biceps Tendon: A Cadaveric Study
    Golish, S. Raymond
    Caldwell, Paul E.
    Miller, Mark D.
    Singanamala, Naveen
    Ranawat, Anil S.
    Treme, Gehron
    Pearson, Sara E.
    Costic, Ryan
    Sekiya, Jon K.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2008, 24 (10): : 1103 - 1108
  • [28] Biomechanical evaluation of syndesmotic fixation techniques via finite element analysis: Screw vs. suture button
    Alastuey-Lopez, Diego
    Seral, Belen
    Angeles Perez, Ma
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2021, 208 (208)
  • [29] Lisfranc open reduction and internal fixation in an athletic population: screw versus suture button fixation
    Gee, Shawn
    Harris, Mitchell C.
    Anderson, Claude
    Groth, Adam
    Ryan, Paul
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2019, 30 (04): : 323 - 326
  • [30] Biomechanical Comparison of Suture-External Button Fixation vs Internal Suspension Fixation for Tendon Transfers of the Feet
    Pathy, Rubini
    Sturnick, Daniel R.
    Blanco, John S.
    Dodwell, Emily R.
    Scher, David M.
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 40 (07) : 845 - 852