Assessing the Readability and Comprehensibility of Online Patient Educational Materials for Common Disorders

被引:0
|
作者
Davis, Joshua L. [1 ]
Gerhold, Cameron [2 ]
Roeder, Jason [3 ]
Carr, Rachel A. [4 ]
Mobley, Lawrence [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Psychiat, Coll Med, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] Florida State Univ, Coll Med, Orthoped Surg, Tallahassee, FL USA
[3] Florida Int Univ, Psychol, Miami, FL USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Pediat, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
psychotic disorders; mental health education; schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders; online patient education; flesch-kincaid; readability; measures; psychiatry & mental health; HEALTH LITERACY; PSYCHOSIS; ILLNESS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.68064
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background In our age of technology, millions of people use the Internet daily for health-related searches and guidance, both patients and caregivers alike. However, health literacy remains notably low among U.S. adults, and this issue is particularly critical for individuals with severe mental illnesses. Poor health literacy is often linked to low socioeconomic status and correlates with adverse patient outcomes and limited healthcare access. With the average reading level of the U.S. adult at the eighth-grade level, guidelines recommend health information be written to match. This study focuses on the readability of top Google search results for common psychotic disorders, emphasizing the need for accessible online health information to support vulnerable populations with severe mental illnesses. Methods The top five most visited websites for eight psychiatric conditions were included in this study. These conditions included schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, schizophreniform disorder, delusional disorder, bipolar 1 disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD) with psychotic features, substance-induced psychotic disorder, and psychotic disorder due to a general medical condition. The Flesch-Kincaid (FK) reading ease and grade level score were calculated for each webpage. Additionally, all institutions and organizations that created each webpage were noted. Results The average FK grade level was 9.9 (corresponding to a 10th-grade level), while the overall FK reading ease was 37.3 (corresponding to college-level difficulty) across all disorders analyzed. Websites on MDD with psychotic features had the lowest average FK grade level, 8.6, and best reading ease score. Websites discussing delusional disorder had the highest average FK grade level, 11.2, while those with information on schizophreniform disorder had the lowest average reading ease with a score of 31.7, corresponding to "difficult (college)" level reading. Conclusion Both patient education and compliance can be improved with more accessible and readable patient educational materials. Our study shows significant opportunities for improvement in the readability and comprehensibility of online educational materials for eight of the most common psychotic disorders. Physicians and other healthcare providers should be aware of this barrier, recommending specific websites, literature, and resources for patients and their caregivers. Further efforts should be aimed at creating new and easy-to-comprehend online material for mental health disorders, ensuring the best quality and care for these patients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Readability of online Spanish patient education materials in dermatology
    Mazmudar, Rishabh S.
    Sheth, Anjani
    Tripathi, Raghav
    Scott, Jeffrey F.
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 313 (03) : 201 - 204
  • [42] Readability of online patient education materials for juvenile dermatomyositis
    Nickles, Melissa A.
    Ramani, Santhoshini L.
    Tegtmeyer, Kyle
    Zhao, Jeffrey
    Lio, Peter A.
    PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 38 (02) : 544 - 546
  • [43] Readability and Suitability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma
    Martin, Cole A.
    Khan, Saima
    Lee, Rachel
    Do, Anna T.
    Sridhar, Jayanth
    Crowell, Eric L.
    Bowden, Eileen C.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY GLAUCOMA, 2022, 5 (05): : 525 - 530
  • [44] Readability and Suitability of Online Uveitis Patient Education Materials
    Khan, Saima
    Moon, Jared
    Martin, Cole A. A.
    Bowden, Eileen
    Chen, Judy
    Tsui, Edmund
    Crowell, Eric
    OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION, 2024, 32 (07) : 1175 - 1179
  • [45] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Peripheral Neuropathy
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Hansberry, David
    NEUROLOGY, 2012, 78
  • [46] Readability Assessment of Online Urology Patient Education Materials
    Colaco, Marc
    Svider, Peter F.
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Eloy, Jean Anderson
    Jackson, Imani M.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (03): : 1048 - 1052
  • [47] Assessing Online Patient Education Readability for Spine Surgery Procedures
    Long, William W.
    Modi, Krishna D.
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Khechen, Benjamin
    Massel, Dustin H.
    Mayo, Benjamin C.
    Singh, Kern
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (02): : E146 - E151
  • [48] Assessing the Readability of Online Patient Education Resources Related to Gynecomastia
    Nnamani Silva, Ogonna N.
    Ammanuel, Simon G.
    Segobiano, Brett M.
    Edwards, Caleb S.
    Hoffman, William Y.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 87 (02) : 123 - 125
  • [49] Assessing the readability and quality of online patient information for laser tattooremoval
    Jean-Pierre, Philippe
    Scheinkman, Ryan
    Nouri, Keyvan
    LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 39 (01)
  • [50] Assessing the Readability of Online Peripheral Arterial Disease Patient Resources
    Avra, Tucker
    Hernandez, Stephanie A.
    Le, Monica
    Ulloa, Jesus G.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 75 (06) : E278 - E278