Assessing the Readability of Online Patient Education Resources Related to Gynecomastia

被引:8
|
作者
Nnamani Silva, Ogonna N. [1 ]
Ammanuel, Simon G. [1 ]
Segobiano, Brett M. [2 ]
Edwards, Caleb S. [1 ]
Hoffman, William Y. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Coll Arts & Letters, South Bend, IN USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Surg, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
gynecomastia; male breast enlargement; readability; patient education; health literacy; plastic surgery; plastic surgery education; Internet-based observations; LIMITED-ENGLISH PROFICIENCY; HEALTH LITERACY; LANGUAGE CONCORDANCE; INTERNET; CARE; LATINOS; CANCER;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000002620
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The Internet has a plethora of online patient education resources for many symptoms and diseases. National medical governing bodies recommend that patient education materials are written at or below the eighth-grade level, and the literature suggests that health literacy has been linked to increased adherence to treatment regimens and improved outcomes. The primary aim of the study is to assess the readability of online patient materials relating to gynecomastia and ascertain the availability of patient materials in non-English languages. Methods The readability of patient education materials relating to gynecomastia for academic-based websites and nonacademic websites was assessed using the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG). The prevalence of non-English patient education materials was assessed for both academic-based and nonacademic websites. Results Fifty-eight documents were collected across academic websites. Overall median values were 10.7 for the FKGL, 47.0 for the FRE, and 11.4 for the SMOG. For the 10 nonacademic institutions, the overall median values were 10.6 for the FKGL, 45.2 for the FRE, and 10.8 for the SMOG. No appreciable differences were observed for readability when stratified by region or source. The prevalence of non-English patient materials was 19.1% across institutions. None of the noninstitutional materials had information in non-English languages. Conclusions The readability of patient education materials related to gynecomastia is at higher levels than recommended by national organizations. There are limited non-English patient education materials. Future efforts should focus on improving the readability and accessibility of patient materials.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 125
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing the Readability of Online Patient Education Resources Related to Neophallus Reconstruction
    Paidisetty, Praneet
    Sathyanarayanan, Sairandri
    Wang, Leonard Kuan-Pei
    Slaughter, Kristen
    Freet, Daniel
    Greives, Matthew
    Chen, Wendy
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 291 : 296 - 302
  • [2] Readability of online dermatology patient education resources
    Natarelli, Nicole
    Nguyen, Lynn
    Botto, Elizabeth
    Coughlin, Emily
    Krenitsky, Amanda
    Albers, Sharon
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2024, 38 (11) : e917 - e919
  • [3] Readability of Online Spine Patient Education Resources
    Luciani, A. Michael
    Foster, Brian K.
    Hayes, Daniel
    DelSole, Edward M.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 162 : E640 - E644
  • [5] Response Regarding: Assessing the Readability of Online Education Resources Related to Neophallus Reconstruction
    Paidisetty, Praneet
    Sathyanarayanan, Sairandri
    Wang, Leonard Kuan-Pei
    Slaughter, Kristen
    Freet, Daniel
    Greives, Matthew
    Chen, Wendy
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 295 : 876 - 877
  • [6] Assessing the Readability of Online Peripheral Arterial Disease Patient Resources
    Avra, Tucker
    Hernandez, Stephanie A.
    Le, Monica
    Ulloa, Jesus G.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 75 (06) : E278 - E278
  • [7] Through the lens of the patient: assessing the readability of online patient education materials
    Kapoor, K.
    George, P.
    Evans, M. C.
    Liu, S. S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 : 1251 - 1252
  • [8] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to IR
    McEnteggart, Gregory E.
    Naeem, Muhammad
    Skierkowski, Dorothy
    Baird, Grayson L.
    Ahn, Sun H.
    Soares, Gregory
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 26 (08) : 1164 - 1168
  • [9] Assessing Online Patient Education Readability for Spine Surgery Procedures
    Long, William W.
    Modi, Krishna D.
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Khechen, Benjamin
    Massel, Dustin H.
    Mayo, Benjamin C.
    Singh, Kern
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (02): : E146 - E151
  • [10] Facial Paralysis Online Educational Resources: Readability and Benefit to Patient Education
    Somasundaram, Mithila
    Novak, Christine B.
    Zuker, Ronald M.
    Borschel, Gregory H.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 148 (02) : 342E - 344E