Assessing the Readability of Online Patient Education Resources Related to Gynecomastia

被引:8
|
作者
Nnamani Silva, Ogonna N. [1 ]
Ammanuel, Simon G. [1 ]
Segobiano, Brett M. [2 ]
Edwards, Caleb S. [1 ]
Hoffman, William Y. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Coll Arts & Letters, South Bend, IN USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Surg, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
gynecomastia; male breast enlargement; readability; patient education; health literacy; plastic surgery; plastic surgery education; Internet-based observations; LIMITED-ENGLISH PROFICIENCY; HEALTH LITERACY; LANGUAGE CONCORDANCE; INTERNET; CARE; LATINOS; CANCER;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000002620
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The Internet has a plethora of online patient education resources for many symptoms and diseases. National medical governing bodies recommend that patient education materials are written at or below the eighth-grade level, and the literature suggests that health literacy has been linked to increased adherence to treatment regimens and improved outcomes. The primary aim of the study is to assess the readability of online patient materials relating to gynecomastia and ascertain the availability of patient materials in non-English languages. Methods The readability of patient education materials relating to gynecomastia for academic-based websites and nonacademic websites was assessed using the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG). The prevalence of non-English patient education materials was assessed for both academic-based and nonacademic websites. Results Fifty-eight documents were collected across academic websites. Overall median values were 10.7 for the FKGL, 47.0 for the FRE, and 11.4 for the SMOG. For the 10 nonacademic institutions, the overall median values were 10.6 for the FKGL, 45.2 for the FRE, and 10.8 for the SMOG. No appreciable differences were observed for readability when stratified by region or source. The prevalence of non-English patient materials was 19.1% across institutions. None of the noninstitutional materials had information in non-English languages. Conclusions The readability of patient education materials related to gynecomastia is at higher levels than recommended by national organizations. There are limited non-English patient education materials. Future efforts should focus on improving the readability and accessibility of patient materials.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 125
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Critical Review of the Readability of Online Patient Education Resources From RadiologyInfo.Org
    Hansberry, David R.
    John, Ann
    John, Elizabeth
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Gonzales, Sharon F.
    Baker, Stephen R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 202 (03) : 566 - 575
  • [22] The readability of online patient resources for skin cancer treatment
    Dobbs, T.
    Neal, G.
    Hutchings, H.
    Whitaker, I. S.
    Milton, J.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2017, 137 (10) : S290 - S290
  • [23] Online Patient Resources for Liposuction A Comparative Analysis of Readability
    Vargas, Christina R.
    Ricci, Joseph A.
    Chuang, Danielle J.
    Lee, Bernard T.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 76 (03) : 349 - 354
  • [24] Online Patient Resources for Breast Reconstruction: An Analysis of Readability
    Vargas, Christina R.
    Koolen, Pieter G. L.
    Chuang, Danielle J.
    Ganor, Oren
    Lee, Bernard T.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 134 (03) : 406 - 413
  • [25] The Readability of Online Patient Resources for Skin Cancer Treatment
    Thomas Dobbs
    Giles Neal
    Hayley A. Hutchings
    Iain S. Whitaker
    James Milton
    Oncology and Therapy, 2017, 5 (2) : 149 - 160
  • [26] Readability of Online Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Resources
    Foster, Brian K.
    Callahan, Clarice
    Dwyer, C. Liam
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [27] Online patient resources for hernia repair: analysis of readability
    Vargas, Christina R.
    Chuang, Danielle J.
    Lee, Bernard T.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2014, 190 (01) : 144 - 150
  • [28] Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma
    Cheng, Brian T.
    Kim, Anne B.
    Tanna, Angelo P.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2022, 31 (06) : 438 - 442
  • [29] Quality and Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Related to Branchial Cleft Cysts
    Daines, Benjamin S.
    Idicula, Winslo
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [30] Readability analysis of online resources related to lung cancer
    Weiss, Kathleen D.
    Vargas, Christina R.
    Ho, Olivia A.
    Chuang, Danielle J.
    Weiss, Jonathan
    Lee, Bernard T.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 206 (01) : 90 - 97