How to Set Working Cannula in Endoscopic-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Morphometric Analysis Based on Computed Tomography

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou, Conghui [1 ]
Lou, Junsheng [1 ]
Fan, Yunpeng [1 ]
Guo, Ziyi [2 ]
Shen, Honghao [1 ]
Jin, Mengran [1 ]
Wu, Junsong [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Orthoped Surg, 79 Qingchun Rd, Hangzhou 310003, Peoples R China
[2] Shenzhen Pingle Orthoped Hosp, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
关键词
Computed Tomography; Endoscopic-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (Endo-TLIF); Exiting Nerve Root; Intervertebral Foramen; Three-Dimensional Reconstruction; INTERVERTEBRAL FORAMEN; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; NERVE ROOT;
D O I
10.1111/os.14239
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectivesThere is a high risk of nerve root injury during endoscopic-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF). This study used computed tomography (CT) imaging to assess the relationship between the exiting nerve root and its surroundings, and the corresponding intervertebral disc. We also measured the approximate position and angle for the placement of the working cannula to reduce the risk of nerve root injury during Endo-TLIF procedures in the Chinese population.MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted at our institution between December 2021 and December 2022. A total of 115 patients suffering from low back pain were recruited for the study. For each participant, three-dimensional (3D) vertebral models of the lumbar segments from L3 to S1 were constructed based on their CT images. The nerve root-disc distance, cannula insertion bypass distance and angle, foraminal height and width, exiting nerve root height, and nerve root-pedicle distance were measured. A paired t-test was used to compare measurements between the left and right sides, while inter- and intraobserver reproducibility was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).ResultsFrom L3/4 to L5/S1 segments, the ideal cannula insertion distance range was 37.51 +/- 4.91-120.38 +/- 37.71 mm at L3/4; 42.38 +/- 5.29-116.25 +/- 27.22 mm at L4/5; and 37.78 +/- 4.86-69.26 +/- 12.64 mm at L5/S1. The appropriate cannula insertion angle range was 30.86 degrees +/- 5.05 degrees-62.59 degrees +/- 6.66 degrees at L3/4; 34.30 degrees +/- 4.73 degrees-60.88 degrees +/- 7.34 degrees at L4/5; and 35.89 degrees +/- 4.18 degrees-47.65 degrees +/- 7.38 degrees at L5/S1. The height of the intervertebral foramen (IVF) gradually decreased, and the width steadily increased. The exiting nerve root height and the nerve root-pedicle distance slightly decreased caudally.ConclusionFrom L3/4 to L5/S1, the range of working cannula insertion distance and angle gradually decreased, and the exiting nerve root height occupying the IVF gradually increased. Our measurement can reduce the risk of nerve root injury caused by inserting the working cannula during Endo-TLIF. This study introduces a novel approach for determining the approximate position and angle for placement of the working cannula. Observing a reduction in the insertion distance and angle from L3/4 to L5/S1 aims to reduce the risk of nerve root injury during Endo-TLIF procedures.image
引用
收藏
页码:3006 / 3013
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Han, Hao
    Song, Yifan
    Li, Yiming
    Zhou, Hengcai
    Fu, Yufei
    Li, Jie
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [42] Short-term clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hao Han
    Yifan Song
    Yiming Li
    Hengcai Zhou
    Yufei Fu
    Jie Li
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18
  • [43] Transiliac Endoscopic-Assisted L5S1 Intraforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Considerations and Potential Complications
    Sousa, Jose Miguel
    Silva, Joao Luis
    Gamelas, Joao
    Consciencia, Jose Guimaraes
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 178 : E741 - E749
  • [44] Closing the Gap: The Incidence of Complications in Minimally Invasive Tubular, Endoscopic, and Robotic-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedures
    Gerling, Michael
    Baker, Melissa
    Stanton, Eloise
    Pyun, Joseph
    Chaladoff, Evan
    Passias, Peter
    Buser, Zorica
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 189 : E492 - E497
  • [45] Cost-effectiveness analysis of extended endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (EELF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): a prospective observational study
    Kim, Jun-Hoe
    Park, Hangeul
    Lee, Chang-Hyun
    Kim, Chi Heon
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [46] Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
    Safaee, Michael
    Oh, Taemin
    Pekmezci, Murat
    Clark, Aaron J.
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2019, (150):
  • [47] Cage Obliquity in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion-- How Common Is It and What Are the Effects on Fusion Rates, Subsidence, and Sagittal Alignment? A Computed Tomography-Based Analysis
    Foong, Bryan Chun Meng
    Wong, Joey Ying Hao
    Betzler, Brjan
    Oh, Jacob Yoong Leong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2024, 18 (05):
  • [48] Robotic-Assisted vs Nonrobotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Cost-Utility Analysis
    Garcia, Diogo
    Akinduro, Oluwaseun O.
    De Biase, Gaetano
    Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo
    Jerreld, Daniel J.
    Dholakia, Ruchita
    Borah, Bijan
    Nottmeier, Eric
    Deen, H. Gordon
    Fox, W. Christopher
    Bydon, Mohamad
    Chen, Selby
    Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo
    Abode-Iyamah, Kingsley
    NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 90 (02) : 192 - 198
  • [49] Changes in the Operative Corridor in Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Between Preoperative Imaging and Intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Using Morphometric Analysis
    Zehri, Aqib
    Soriano-Baron, Hector Enrique
    Hsu, Wesley
    Neal, Matthew
    Wilson, Jonathan L.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 66 : 31 - 31
  • [50] Use of Intraoperative Computed Tomography Improves Outcome of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study
    Venier, Alice
    Croci, Davide
    Robert, Thomas
    Distefano, Daniela
    Presilla, Stefano
    Scarone, Pietro
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 148 : E572 - E580