How to Set Working Cannula in Endoscopic-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Morphometric Analysis Based on Computed Tomography

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou, Conghui [1 ]
Lou, Junsheng [1 ]
Fan, Yunpeng [1 ]
Guo, Ziyi [2 ]
Shen, Honghao [1 ]
Jin, Mengran [1 ]
Wu, Junsong [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Orthoped Surg, 79 Qingchun Rd, Hangzhou 310003, Peoples R China
[2] Shenzhen Pingle Orthoped Hosp, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
关键词
Computed Tomography; Endoscopic-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (Endo-TLIF); Exiting Nerve Root; Intervertebral Foramen; Three-Dimensional Reconstruction; INTERVERTEBRAL FORAMEN; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; NERVE ROOT;
D O I
10.1111/os.14239
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectivesThere is a high risk of nerve root injury during endoscopic-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF). This study used computed tomography (CT) imaging to assess the relationship between the exiting nerve root and its surroundings, and the corresponding intervertebral disc. We also measured the approximate position and angle for the placement of the working cannula to reduce the risk of nerve root injury during Endo-TLIF procedures in the Chinese population.MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted at our institution between December 2021 and December 2022. A total of 115 patients suffering from low back pain were recruited for the study. For each participant, three-dimensional (3D) vertebral models of the lumbar segments from L3 to S1 were constructed based on their CT images. The nerve root-disc distance, cannula insertion bypass distance and angle, foraminal height and width, exiting nerve root height, and nerve root-pedicle distance were measured. A paired t-test was used to compare measurements between the left and right sides, while inter- and intraobserver reproducibility was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).ResultsFrom L3/4 to L5/S1 segments, the ideal cannula insertion distance range was 37.51 +/- 4.91-120.38 +/- 37.71 mm at L3/4; 42.38 +/- 5.29-116.25 +/- 27.22 mm at L4/5; and 37.78 +/- 4.86-69.26 +/- 12.64 mm at L5/S1. The appropriate cannula insertion angle range was 30.86 degrees +/- 5.05 degrees-62.59 degrees +/- 6.66 degrees at L3/4; 34.30 degrees +/- 4.73 degrees-60.88 degrees +/- 7.34 degrees at L4/5; and 35.89 degrees +/- 4.18 degrees-47.65 degrees +/- 7.38 degrees at L5/S1. The height of the intervertebral foramen (IVF) gradually decreased, and the width steadily increased. The exiting nerve root height and the nerve root-pedicle distance slightly decreased caudally.ConclusionFrom L3/4 to L5/S1, the range of working cannula insertion distance and angle gradually decreased, and the exiting nerve root height occupying the IVF gradually increased. Our measurement can reduce the risk of nerve root injury caused by inserting the working cannula during Endo-TLIF. This study introduces a novel approach for determining the approximate position and angle for placement of the working cannula. Observing a reduction in the insertion distance and angle from L3/4 to L5/S1 aims to reduce the risk of nerve root injury during Endo-TLIF procedures.image
引用
收藏
页码:3006 / 3013
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus conventional interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qi Yu
    Hui gen Lu
    Xue kang Pan
    Zhong hai Shen
    Peng Ren
    Xu qi Hu
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 24
  • [32] Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) versus endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis along with intervertebral disc herniation: a retrospective analysis
    Zuoran Fan
    Xiaolin Wu
    Zhu Guo
    Nana Shen
    Bohua Chen
    Hongfei Xiang
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 25
  • [33] Unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus conventional interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu, Qi
    Lu, Hui Gen
    Pan, Xue Kang
    Shen, Zhong Hai
    Ren, Peng
    Hu, Xu Qi
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [34] Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) versus endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis along with intervertebral disc herniation: a retrospective analysis
    Fan, Zuoran
    Wu, Xiaolin
    Guo, Zhu
    Shen, Nana
    Chen, Bohua
    Xiang, Hongfei
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [36] Robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective matched-control analysis for clinical and quality-of-life outcomes
    Chen, Xiuyuan
    Song, Qingxin
    Wang, Kun
    Chen, Zhi
    Han, Yingchao
    Shen, Hongxing
    Li, Quan
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2021, 10 (10) : 845 - 856
  • [37] How I do it: dual operation channels percutaneous endoscopic far-lateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Xiao, Qingqing
    Wu, Ji
    Chu, Fuming
    Li, Yue
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2024, 166 (01)
  • [38] Transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion microscopic safe operating area: a three-dimensional model study based on computed tomography imaging
    Wang, Wei
    Cui, Yukai
    Sun, Xiaohao
    Zhang, Haoran
    Yin, Wen
    Cui, Xilong
    Jiao, Wei
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [39] Comparison of endoscopic spine surgery and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: A meta-analysis
    Goh, Tae Sik
    Park, Shi Hwan
    Kim, Dong Suk
    Ryu, Seungyoon
    Son, Seung Min
    Lee, Jung Sub
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 88 : 5 - 9
  • [40] Neuroforaminal Bone Growth Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With BMP A Computed Tomographic Analysis
    Ahn, Junyoung
    Jorgensen, Anton Y.
    Bohl, Daniel D.
    Tabaraee, Ehsan
    Rossi, Vincent J.
    Aboushaala, Khaled
    Singh, Kern
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2017, 30 (06): : E754 - E758