Complication Rates of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Oncologic Versus Non-Oncologic Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Dominikus, Huber [1 ]
Veronika, Weiler [1 ]
Maximilian, J. Mair
Martina, Spalt [4 ]
Pavla, Krotka [2 ]
Christoph, Krall [2 ]
Christian, Kinstner [3 ]
Christian, Loewe [3 ]
Rupert, Bartsch [1 ]
Christoph, Minichsdorfer [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Med 1, Div Oncol, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Ctr Med Data Sci, Vienna, Austria
[3] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Radiol & Image Guided Therapy, Div Cardiovasc & Intervent Radiol, Vienna, Austria
[4] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Med 1, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Peripherally inserted central catheter; Catheter related blood stream infection; Catheter related thrombosis; PICC; related adverse events; Cancer; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS; BLOOD-STREAM INFECTIONS; EVIDENCE-BASED GUIDELINES; CANCER-PATIENTS; RISK-FACTORS; NHS HOSPITALS; THROMBOSIS; PICC; CHEMOTHERAPY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151681
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: Peripherally inserted central catheters are commonly used in cancer patients and provide vascular access for the administration of chemotherapy, antibiotics, or parenteral nutrition. Besides many advantages, they represent a source of possible complications such as catheter related blood stream infection, catheter occlusion, or thrombosis. In this study, the catheter-related complication rate between oncologic and non-oncologic patients was compared. Methods: This retrospective cohort-study included 411 patients who underwent their first catheter placement at the Vienna General Hospital-Medical University of Vienna from January 2013 to June 2018. Patient demographics and catheter-related parameters were collected and statistically analyzed using a competing risk model. Results: Mean catheter dwell time was 27.75 days. The overall complication rate was 7.54% (2.72 per 1000 catheter days). Underlying malignant disease (hazard ratio: 0.351, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.133-0.929, P = .035) and chemotherapy administration (hazard ratio: 2.837, 95% CI: 1.088-7.394, P = .033) were significantly associated with the occurrence of any kind of complication. Catheter related blood stream infection was observed among 11 (2.68%) patients and again significantly associated with chemotherapy administration (hazard ratio: 4.545, 95% CI: 1.178-17.539; P = .028). Thrombosis was found in 7 (1.70%) patients and occlusion in 13 (3.16%) cases. Conclusions and implications for nursing practice: Choice of venous access is an interdisciplinary decision with emphasis on patient participation. In oncologic patients, our data suggests that the benefits of peripherally inserted central catheters regarding costs, invasiveness, and accessibility might be outweighed by the higher rate of complications associated with the device. This becomes even more important in a community care setting, where standardized handling procedures and patient education play a pivotal role in device safety. (c) 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Non-oncologic use of human recombinant erythropoietin in hospitalized patients
    Morris, Charles A.
    Fischer, Michael A.
    Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C.
    Avorn, Jerry
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2006, 15 : S18 - S18
  • [42] Peripherally inserted central catheters and implanted ports. A retrospective analysis of the complication rates and evaluation of associated costs
    McInerney, V.
    Keane, M.
    O'Donovan, D.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2005, 3 (02): : 453 - 454
  • [43] Complications associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in antepartum patients
    Burg, T
    Myles, T
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (06) : S81 - S81
  • [44] Are peripherally inserted central catheters in critical ill patients justified?
    O Martínez González
    D Ballesteros
    C Martín Parra
    M Chana
    B López Matamala
    MA Alonso Fernández
    B Estébanez
    J Luján
    R Blancas
    Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, 3 (Suppl 1)
  • [45] Peripherally inserted central venous catheters for patients with hematological malignancies
    Harter, C
    Egerer, G
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2004, 12 (11) : 815 - 816
  • [46] Radiologic versus bedside placement of peripherally inserted central catheters - Response
    Rosen, MP
    Murphy, B
    Neuman, ML
    RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209 (01) : 285 - 285
  • [47] Non-oncologic Indications for Male Fertility Preservation
    Yang, Heiko
    Ramstein, Joris
    Smith, James
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2019, 20 (09)
  • [48] PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS IN CRITICAL CARE PATIENTS
    ABINADER, JA
    HEART & LUNG, 1993, 22 (05): : 428 - 434
  • [49] Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Pediatric Patients: To Repair or Not Repair
    Ralph Gnannt
    Premal Patel
    Michael Temple
    Yahya Al Brashdi
    Joao Amaral
    Dimitri Parra
    Vanessa Rea
    Derek Stephens
    Bairbre Connolly
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2017, 40 : 845 - 851
  • [50] In defense of the use of peripherally inserted central catheters in pediatric patients
    Crocoli, Alessandro
    Cesaro, Simone
    Cellini, Monica
    Rossetti, Francesca
    Sidro, Luca
    Pinelli, Fulvio
    Pittiruti, Mauro
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2021, 22 (03): : 333 - 336