Complication Rates of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Oncologic Versus Non-Oncologic Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Dominikus, Huber [1 ]
Veronika, Weiler [1 ]
Maximilian, J. Mair
Martina, Spalt [4 ]
Pavla, Krotka [2 ]
Christoph, Krall [2 ]
Christian, Kinstner [3 ]
Christian, Loewe [3 ]
Rupert, Bartsch [1 ]
Christoph, Minichsdorfer [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Med 1, Div Oncol, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Ctr Med Data Sci, Vienna, Austria
[3] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Radiol & Image Guided Therapy, Div Cardiovasc & Intervent Radiol, Vienna, Austria
[4] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Med 1, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Peripherally inserted central catheter; Catheter related blood stream infection; Catheter related thrombosis; PICC; related adverse events; Cancer; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS; BLOOD-STREAM INFECTIONS; EVIDENCE-BASED GUIDELINES; CANCER-PATIENTS; RISK-FACTORS; NHS HOSPITALS; THROMBOSIS; PICC; CHEMOTHERAPY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151681
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: Peripherally inserted central catheters are commonly used in cancer patients and provide vascular access for the administration of chemotherapy, antibiotics, or parenteral nutrition. Besides many advantages, they represent a source of possible complications such as catheter related blood stream infection, catheter occlusion, or thrombosis. In this study, the catheter-related complication rate between oncologic and non-oncologic patients was compared. Methods: This retrospective cohort-study included 411 patients who underwent their first catheter placement at the Vienna General Hospital-Medical University of Vienna from January 2013 to June 2018. Patient demographics and catheter-related parameters were collected and statistically analyzed using a competing risk model. Results: Mean catheter dwell time was 27.75 days. The overall complication rate was 7.54% (2.72 per 1000 catheter days). Underlying malignant disease (hazard ratio: 0.351, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.133-0.929, P = .035) and chemotherapy administration (hazard ratio: 2.837, 95% CI: 1.088-7.394, P = .033) were significantly associated with the occurrence of any kind of complication. Catheter related blood stream infection was observed among 11 (2.68%) patients and again significantly associated with chemotherapy administration (hazard ratio: 4.545, 95% CI: 1.178-17.539; P = .028). Thrombosis was found in 7 (1.70%) patients and occlusion in 13 (3.16%) cases. Conclusions and implications for nursing practice: Choice of venous access is an interdisciplinary decision with emphasis on patient participation. In oncologic patients, our data suggests that the benefits of peripherally inserted central catheters regarding costs, invasiveness, and accessibility might be outweighed by the higher rate of complications associated with the device. This becomes even more important in a community care setting, where standardized handling procedures and patient education play a pivotal role in device safety. (c) 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Peripherally inserted central catheters
    Yaghmai, B
    Owens, CA
    Warner, D
    SEMINARS IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1998, 15 (03) : 305 - 314
  • [22] Non-oncologic imaging of the larynx
    Glastonbury, Christine M.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2008, 41 (01) : 139 - +
  • [23] Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters
    Bourgeois, Fabienne C.
    Lamagna, Paula
    Chiang, Vincent W.
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2011, 27 (06) : 556 - 561
  • [24] Volumetric analysis at abdominal CT: oncologic and non-oncologic applications
    Planz, Virginia B.
    Lubner, Meghan G.
    Pickhardt, Perry J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 92 (1095):
  • [25] Infection Rate of Hickman Catheters Versus Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters in Oncology Patients
    Wong, W. Y.
    Chan, W. C. S.
    Ip, S. K.
    Ng, W. K.
    Chan, C. X.
    Ho, H. M.
    Siu, K. L.
    Tan, C. B.
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 18 (03): : 197 - 204
  • [26] Palliative Oncologic Patients Die at Home and Palliative Non-oncologic Patients Die in the Hospital.
    Castillo, C.
    Rodriguez, C.
    Garcia, C.
    Bartolome, A.
    Diaz de Cerio, M.
    Gomez, C.
    Cuadrado, M.
    Gomez, M.
    Aguirre, B.
    Carbonell, A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2012, 60 : S223 - S224
  • [27] Implementation of tunneled versus not tunneled peripherally inserted central catheters
    Maria, Kapritsou
    Theodoros, Katsoulas
    Maria, Bastaki
    Panagiotis, Kiekkas
    Emmanouil, Stafylarakis
    Evangelos, Konstantinou A.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR NURSING, 2019, 37 (02) : 132 - 134
  • [28] Radiologic versus bedside placement of peripherally inserted central catheters
    Funaki, B
    Zaleski, GX
    RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209 (01) : 284 - 285
  • [29] Nephrologists Versus Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Are the PICCs Winning?
    Kalloo, Sean
    Wish, Jay B.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2016, 11 (08): : 1333 - 1334
  • [30] Photodynamic Therapy: Non-Oncologic Indications
    Karrer, S.
    AKTUELLE DERMATOLOGIE, 2005, 31 (05) : 217 - 224