Complication Rates of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Oncologic Versus Non-Oncologic Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Dominikus, Huber [1 ]
Veronika, Weiler [1 ]
Maximilian, J. Mair
Martina, Spalt [4 ]
Pavla, Krotka [2 ]
Christoph, Krall [2 ]
Christian, Kinstner [3 ]
Christian, Loewe [3 ]
Rupert, Bartsch [1 ]
Christoph, Minichsdorfer [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Med 1, Div Oncol, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Ctr Med Data Sci, Vienna, Austria
[3] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Radiol & Image Guided Therapy, Div Cardiovasc & Intervent Radiol, Vienna, Austria
[4] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Med 1, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Peripherally inserted central catheter; Catheter related blood stream infection; Catheter related thrombosis; PICC; related adverse events; Cancer; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS; BLOOD-STREAM INFECTIONS; EVIDENCE-BASED GUIDELINES; CANCER-PATIENTS; RISK-FACTORS; NHS HOSPITALS; THROMBOSIS; PICC; CHEMOTHERAPY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151681
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: Peripherally inserted central catheters are commonly used in cancer patients and provide vascular access for the administration of chemotherapy, antibiotics, or parenteral nutrition. Besides many advantages, they represent a source of possible complications such as catheter related blood stream infection, catheter occlusion, or thrombosis. In this study, the catheter-related complication rate between oncologic and non-oncologic patients was compared. Methods: This retrospective cohort-study included 411 patients who underwent their first catheter placement at the Vienna General Hospital-Medical University of Vienna from January 2013 to June 2018. Patient demographics and catheter-related parameters were collected and statistically analyzed using a competing risk model. Results: Mean catheter dwell time was 27.75 days. The overall complication rate was 7.54% (2.72 per 1000 catheter days). Underlying malignant disease (hazard ratio: 0.351, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.133-0.929, P = .035) and chemotherapy administration (hazard ratio: 2.837, 95% CI: 1.088-7.394, P = .033) were significantly associated with the occurrence of any kind of complication. Catheter related blood stream infection was observed among 11 (2.68%) patients and again significantly associated with chemotherapy administration (hazard ratio: 4.545, 95% CI: 1.178-17.539; P = .028). Thrombosis was found in 7 (1.70%) patients and occlusion in 13 (3.16%) cases. Conclusions and implications for nursing practice: Choice of venous access is an interdisciplinary decision with emphasis on patient participation. In oncologic patients, our data suggests that the benefits of peripherally inserted central catheters regarding costs, invasiveness, and accessibility might be outweighed by the higher rate of complications associated with the device. This becomes even more important in a community care setting, where standardized handling procedures and patient education play a pivotal role in device safety. (c) 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARING COMPLICATION RATES IN CENTRAL LINES VERSUS PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETERS
    Noonan, Patrick
    Petersen, Tara
    Hanson, Sheila
    Simpson, Pippa
    Dasgupta, Mahua
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (12)
  • [2] Comparison of Complication Rates of Central Venous Catheters Versus Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters in Pediatric Patients*
    Noonan, Patrick J.
    Hanson, Sheila J.
    Simpson, Pippa M.
    Dasgupta, Mahua
    Petersen, Tara L.
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (12) : 1097 - 1105
  • [3] Complication rates among cancer patients with peripherally inserted central catheters
    Walshe, LJ
    Malak, SF
    Eagan, J
    Sepkowitz, KA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (15) : 3276 - 3281
  • [4] Chylothorax - A Complication Of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters
    Kosseifi, S.
    Saleh, H.
    Nour, H. M. Abdel
    Nour, S. M. Abdel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 187
  • [5] Comparison of complication rates of Hickman® catheters versus peripherally inserted central catheters in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing induction chemotherapy
    Lim, Ming Y.
    Al-Kali, Aref
    Ashrani, Aneel A.
    Begna, Kebede H.
    Elliott, Michelle A.
    Hogan, William J.
    Hook, C. Christopher
    Kaufmann, Scott H.
    Letendre, Louis
    Litzow, Mark R.
    Patnaik, Mrinal S.
    Pardanani, Animesh
    Tefferi, Ayalew
    Wolanskyj, Alexandra P.
    Grill, Diane E.
    Pruthi, Rajiv K.
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2013, 54 (06) : 1263 - 1267
  • [6] OOCYTE CRYOPRESERVATION: ONCOLOGIC VERSUS NON-ONCOLOGIC CYCLE CHARACTERISTICS.
    Shandley, Lisa M.
    Katler, Quinton S.
    Hipp, Heather S.
    Fried, Rachel
    Wilder, Cailin
    Calhoun, Kathryn
    Kawwass, Jennifer F.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 116 (03) : E92 - E93
  • [7] Complication rates among peripherally inserted central venous catheters and centrally inserted central catheters in the medical intensive care unit
    Nolan, Matthew E.
    Yadav, Hemang
    Cawcutt, Kelly A.
    Cartin-Ceba, Rodrigo
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 31 (01) : 238 - 242
  • [8] Death as a complication of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates
    Nadroo, AM
    Lin, J
    Green, RS
    Magid, MS
    Holzman, IR
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2001, 138 (04): : 599 - 601
  • [9] Non-oncologic metastases
    Fernandes Neto, Dina
    Melendo-Viu, Maria
    Gomez-Varela, Cristina
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2025,
  • [10] Palliative care in non-oncologic patients
    Benitez-Rosario, MA
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2003, 121 (08): : 297 - 298