Advancing Ki67 hotspot detection in breast cancer: a comparative analysis of automated digital image analysis algorithms

被引:0
|
作者
Zwager, Mieke C. [1 ]
Yu, Shibo [1 ]
Buikema, Henk J. [1 ]
de Bock, Geertruida H. [2 ]
Ramsing, Thomas W. [3 ]
Thagaard, Jeppe [3 ]
Koopman, Timco [1 ,4 ]
van Der Vegt, Bert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Pathol, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Epidemiol, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Visiopharm, Horsholm, Denmark
[4] Pathol Friesland, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
关键词
artificial intelligence (AI); breast cancer; digital image analysis (DIA); hotspot; Ki67 proliferation index; INTERNATIONAL KI67; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; PROLIFERATION; HETEROGENEITY; VALIDATION; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1111/his.15294
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
AimManual detection and scoring of Ki67 hotspots is difficult and prone to variability, limiting its clinical utility. Automated hotspot detection and scoring by digital image analysis (DIA) could improve the assessment of the Ki67 hotspot proliferation index (PI). This study compared the clinical performance of Ki67 hotspot detection and scoring DIA algorithms based on virtual dual staining (VDS) and deep learning (DL) with manual Ki67 hotspot PI assessment.MethodsTissue sections of 135 consecutive invasive breast carcinomas were immunohistochemically stained for Ki67. Two DIA algorithms, based on VDS and DL, automatically determined the Ki67 hotspot PI. For manual assessment; two independent observers detected hotspots and calculated scores using a validated scoring protocol.ResultsAutomated hotspot detection and assessment by VDS and DL could be performed in 73% and 100% of the cases, respectively. Automated hotspot detection by VDS and DL led to higher Ki67 hotspot PIs (mean 39.6% and 38.3%, respectively) compared to manual consensus Ki67 PIs (mean 28.8%). Comparing manual consensus Ki67 PIs with VDS Ki67 PIs revealed substantial correlation (r = 0.90), while manual consensus versus DL Ki67 PIs demonstrated high correlation (r = 0.95).ConclusionAutomated Ki67 hotspot detection and analysis correlated strongly with manual Ki67 assessment and provided higher PIs compared to manual assessment. The DL-based algorithm outperformed the VDS-based algorithm in clinical applicability, because it did not depend on virtual alignment of slides and correlated stronger with manual scores. Use of a DL-based algorithm may allow clearer Ki67 PI cutoff values, thereby improving the clinical usability of Ki67. Manual assessment of Ki67 hotspots is difficult and prone to variability. Automated Ki67 hotspot assessment correlated strongly with manual Ki67 assessment and provided higher Ki67 PIs. DL-based automated Ki67 assessment has high clinical applicability, because it does not depend on virtual alignment of slides and correlates strongly with manual scoring. image
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 213
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Validation of automated Ki67 analysis to predict Oncotype DX recurrence score in early-stage breast cancer
    Chan, Angela M. Y.
    Abedin, Tasnima
    Thakur, Satbir
    Li, HaoCheng
    Konno, Mie
    Enwere, Emeka
    Lupichuk, Sasha
    Nixon, Nancy
    Morris, Donald
    Yang, Hua
    Neri, Paola
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 82 (04)
  • [42] Ki67 Evaluation in Breast Cancer: Molecular Pathology Using Digital Imaging
    Alsibai, K. Drak
    Azoulay, S.
    Languille-Mimoune, O.
    Poulet, B.
    Barres, A.
    Adem, C.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2013, 93 : 492A - 492A
  • [43] Ki67 Evaluation in Breast Cancer: Molecular Pathology Using Digital Imaging
    Alsibai, K. Drak
    Azoulay, S.
    Languille-Mimoune, O.
    Poulet, B.
    Barres, A.
    Adem, C.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2013, 26 : 492A - 492A
  • [44] Manual vs Digital Scoring of Ki67 in Breast Cancer; A Validation Study
    Siddiqi, Ahsan
    Geiger, Xochiquetzal
    Majewicz, Tracy
    Nassar, Aziza
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2020, 100 (SUPPL 1) : 1489 - 1490
  • [45] Manual vs Digital Scoring of Ki67 in Breast Cancer; A Validation Study
    Siddiqi, Ahsan
    Geiger, Xochiquetzal
    Majewicz, Tracy
    Nassar, Aziza
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2020, 33 (SUPPL 2) : 1489 - 1490
  • [46] Using Automated Image Analysis To Validate Ki67 as a Clinical Prognostic Biomarker for Estrogen-Receptor Positive Breast Cancers
    Magliocco, A. M.
    Kornaga, E. N.
    Klimowicz, A. C.
    Petrillo, S. K.
    Konno, M.
    Yau, A.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 70
  • [47] Comparative validation of the SP6 antibody to Ki67 in breast cancer
    Zabaglo, Lila
    Salter, Janine
    Anderson, Helen
    Quinn, Emma
    Hills, Margaret
    Detre, Simone
    A'Hern, Roger
    Dowsett, Mitch
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2010, 63 (09) : 800 - 804
  • [48] Reliability and Variability of Ki-67 Digital Image Analysis Methods for Clinical Diagnostics in Breast Cancer
    Dawe, Melanie
    Shi, Wei
    Liu, Tian Y.
    Lajkosz, Katherine
    Shibahara, Yukiko
    Gopal, Nakita E. K.
    Geread, Rokshana
    Mirjahanmardi, Seyed
    Wei, Carrie X.
    Butt, Sehrish
    Abdalla, Moustafa
    Manolescu, Sabrina
    Liang, Sheng-Ben
    Chadwick, Dianne
    Roehrl, Michael H. A.
    McKee, Trevor D.
    Adeoye, Adewunmi
    McCready, David
    Khademi, April
    Liu, Fei-Fei
    Fyles, Anthony
    Done, Susan J.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2024, 104 (05)
  • [49] The region-of-interest size impacts on Ki67 quantification by computer-assisted image analysis in breast cancer
    Christgen, Matthias
    von Ahsen, Sabrina
    Christgen, Henriette
    Laenger, Florian
    Kreipe, Hans
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2015, 46 (09) : 1341 - 1349
  • [50] Digital image-analysis processes to determine Ki-67 proliferation index in ER positive breast cancer: A comparative study
    Acs, B.
    Bodor, Z.
    Micsik, T.
    Kiszler, G.
    Tokes, A. -M.
    Kulka, J.
    Szasz, A. M.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2015, 467 : S37 - S37