Advancing Ki67 hotspot detection in breast cancer: a comparative analysis of automated digital image analysis algorithms

被引:0
|
作者
Zwager, Mieke C. [1 ]
Yu, Shibo [1 ]
Buikema, Henk J. [1 ]
de Bock, Geertruida H. [2 ]
Ramsing, Thomas W. [3 ]
Thagaard, Jeppe [3 ]
Koopman, Timco [1 ,4 ]
van Der Vegt, Bert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Pathol, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Epidemiol, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Visiopharm, Horsholm, Denmark
[4] Pathol Friesland, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
关键词
artificial intelligence (AI); breast cancer; digital image analysis (DIA); hotspot; Ki67 proliferation index; INTERNATIONAL KI67; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; PROLIFERATION; HETEROGENEITY; VALIDATION; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1111/his.15294
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
AimManual detection and scoring of Ki67 hotspots is difficult and prone to variability, limiting its clinical utility. Automated hotspot detection and scoring by digital image analysis (DIA) could improve the assessment of the Ki67 hotspot proliferation index (PI). This study compared the clinical performance of Ki67 hotspot detection and scoring DIA algorithms based on virtual dual staining (VDS) and deep learning (DL) with manual Ki67 hotspot PI assessment.MethodsTissue sections of 135 consecutive invasive breast carcinomas were immunohistochemically stained for Ki67. Two DIA algorithms, based on VDS and DL, automatically determined the Ki67 hotspot PI. For manual assessment; two independent observers detected hotspots and calculated scores using a validated scoring protocol.ResultsAutomated hotspot detection and assessment by VDS and DL could be performed in 73% and 100% of the cases, respectively. Automated hotspot detection by VDS and DL led to higher Ki67 hotspot PIs (mean 39.6% and 38.3%, respectively) compared to manual consensus Ki67 PIs (mean 28.8%). Comparing manual consensus Ki67 PIs with VDS Ki67 PIs revealed substantial correlation (r = 0.90), while manual consensus versus DL Ki67 PIs demonstrated high correlation (r = 0.95).ConclusionAutomated Ki67 hotspot detection and analysis correlated strongly with manual Ki67 assessment and provided higher PIs compared to manual assessment. The DL-based algorithm outperformed the VDS-based algorithm in clinical applicability, because it did not depend on virtual alignment of slides and correlated stronger with manual scores. Use of a DL-based algorithm may allow clearer Ki67 PI cutoff values, thereby improving the clinical usability of Ki67. Manual assessment of Ki67 hotspots is difficult and prone to variability. Automated Ki67 hotspot assessment correlated strongly with manual Ki67 assessment and provided higher Ki67 PIs. DL-based automated Ki67 assessment has high clinical applicability, because it does not depend on virtual alignment of slides and correlates strongly with manual scoring. image
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 213
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Ki67 dilemma: investigating prognostic cut-offs and reproducibility for automated Ki67 scoring in breast cancer
    Rewcastle, Emma
    Skaland, Ivar
    Gudlaugsson, Einar
    Fykse, Silja Kavlie
    Baak, Jan P. A.
    Janssen, Emiel A. M.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2024, 207 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [22] Quantification of ER, PR, and Ki67 in Breast Cancer Using Image Analysis Software: A Validation Study
    Han, Rachel
    Wen, Hannah
    Giri, Dilip
    Kuba, Maria
    Hanna, Matthew
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2024, 104 (03) : S169 - S171
  • [23] A comparison of labeling index Ki67 determined by image analysis software and visual assessment in breast cancer
    Kushnarev, V.
    Kudaibergenova, A.
    Artemyeva, A.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2017, 471 : S203 - S203
  • [24] High reproducibility in Ki67 assessment in luminal breast cancers enabled by French recommendations and digital image analysis
    Beniere, C.
    Rouzier, R.
    Bellocq, J. -P.
    Allory, Y.
    Guinebretiere, J. -M.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2018, 473 : S30 - S31
  • [25] Assessment of Ki67 Proliferation Index in Mantle Cell Lymphoma with Digital Image Analysis
    Ahmed, Fahad
    Ji, Yuan
    Li, Philippa
    Fu, Kai
    Yu, Guohua
    Cheng, Hongxia
    Xu, Mina
    Rimm, David
    Pan, Zenggang
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2020, 100 (SUPPL 1) : 1245 - 1246
  • [26] A Novel Quasi-automated Ki67 Labeling Index for Glial Neoplasms Using Batch Digital Image Analysis
    Ghatak, Sayak
    Chen, Liam
    Bell, William
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPATHOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 2021, 80 (06): : 605 - 605
  • [27] Independent Clinical Validation of the Automated Ki67 Scoring Guideline from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group
    Boyaci, Ceren
    Sun, Wenwen
    Robertson, Stephanie
    Acs, Balazs
    Hartman, Johan
    BIOMOLECULES, 2021, 11 (11)
  • [28] Assessment of Ki67 Proliferation Index in Mantle Cell Lymphoma with Digital Image Analysis
    Ahmed, Fahad
    Ji, Yuan
    Li, Philippa
    Fu, Kai
    Yu, Guohua
    Cheng, Hongxia
    Xu, Mina
    Rimm, David
    Pan, Zenggang
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2020, 33 (SUPPL 2) : 1245 - 1246
  • [29] Automated Selection of Hotspots (ASH): enhanced automated segmentation and adaptive step finding for Ki67 hotspot detection in adrenal cortical cancer
    Hao Lu
    Thomas G Papathomas
    David van Zessen
    Ivo Palli
    Ronald R de Krijger
    Peter J van der Spek
    Winand NM Dinjens
    Andrew P Stubbs
    Diagnostic Pathology, 9
  • [30] A comparative study of the prognostic role of Ki67 and geminin in breast cancer
    Rajan, S. S.
    Hanby, A.
    Horgan, K.
    Speirs, V.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 : 10 - 10