Advancing Ki67 hotspot detection in breast cancer: a comparative analysis of automated digital image analysis algorithms

被引:0
|
作者
Zwager, Mieke C. [1 ]
Yu, Shibo [1 ]
Buikema, Henk J. [1 ]
de Bock, Geertruida H. [2 ]
Ramsing, Thomas W. [3 ]
Thagaard, Jeppe [3 ]
Koopman, Timco [1 ,4 ]
van Der Vegt, Bert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Pathol, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Epidemiol, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Visiopharm, Horsholm, Denmark
[4] Pathol Friesland, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
关键词
artificial intelligence (AI); breast cancer; digital image analysis (DIA); hotspot; Ki67 proliferation index; INTERNATIONAL KI67; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; PROLIFERATION; HETEROGENEITY; VALIDATION; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1111/his.15294
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
AimManual detection and scoring of Ki67 hotspots is difficult and prone to variability, limiting its clinical utility. Automated hotspot detection and scoring by digital image analysis (DIA) could improve the assessment of the Ki67 hotspot proliferation index (PI). This study compared the clinical performance of Ki67 hotspot detection and scoring DIA algorithms based on virtual dual staining (VDS) and deep learning (DL) with manual Ki67 hotspot PI assessment.MethodsTissue sections of 135 consecutive invasive breast carcinomas were immunohistochemically stained for Ki67. Two DIA algorithms, based on VDS and DL, automatically determined the Ki67 hotspot PI. For manual assessment; two independent observers detected hotspots and calculated scores using a validated scoring protocol.ResultsAutomated hotspot detection and assessment by VDS and DL could be performed in 73% and 100% of the cases, respectively. Automated hotspot detection by VDS and DL led to higher Ki67 hotspot PIs (mean 39.6% and 38.3%, respectively) compared to manual consensus Ki67 PIs (mean 28.8%). Comparing manual consensus Ki67 PIs with VDS Ki67 PIs revealed substantial correlation (r = 0.90), while manual consensus versus DL Ki67 PIs demonstrated high correlation (r = 0.95).ConclusionAutomated Ki67 hotspot detection and analysis correlated strongly with manual Ki67 assessment and provided higher PIs compared to manual assessment. The DL-based algorithm outperformed the VDS-based algorithm in clinical applicability, because it did not depend on virtual alignment of slides and correlated stronger with manual scores. Use of a DL-based algorithm may allow clearer Ki67 PI cutoff values, thereby improving the clinical usability of Ki67. Manual assessment of Ki67 hotspots is difficult and prone to variability. Automated Ki67 hotspot assessment correlated strongly with manual Ki67 assessment and provided higher Ki67 PIs. DL-based automated Ki67 assessment has high clinical applicability, because it does not depend on virtual alignment of slides and correlates strongly with manual scoring. image
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 213
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A simple digital image analysis system for automated Ki67 assessment in primary breast cancer
    Alataki, Anastasia
    Zabaglo, Lila
    Tovey, Holly
    Dodson, Andrew
    Dowsett, Mitch
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2021, 79 (02) : 200 - 209
  • [2] Digital image analysis of Ki67 hotspot detection and index counting in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms
    Saetiew, Kritsanu
    Angkathunyakul, Napat
    Hunnangkul, Saowalak
    Pongpaibul, Ananya
    ANNALS OF DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, 2024, 71
  • [3] A Comparison of Visual Assessment and Automated Digital Image Analysis of Ki67 Labeling Index in Breast Cancer
    Zhong, Fangfang
    Bi, Rui
    Yu, Baohua
    Yang, Fei
    Yang, Wentao
    Shui, Ruohong
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (02):
  • [4] Implementation of Digital Image Analysis in Assessment of Ki67 Index in Breast Cancer
    Vanderschelden, Rachel K.
    Jerome, Jacob A.
    Gonzalez, Daniel
    Seigh, Lindsey
    Carter, Gloria J.
    Clark, Beth Z.
    Elishaev, Esther
    Louis Fine, Jeffrey
    Harinath, Lakshmi
    Jones, Mirka W.
    Villatoro, Tatiana M.
    Soong, Thing Rinda
    Yu, Jing
    Zhao, Chengquan
    Hartman, Doug
    Bhargava, Rohit
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2024, 32 (01) : 17 - 23
  • [5] Digital image analysis of Ki67 in hot spots is superior to both manual Ki67 and mitotic counts in breast cancer
    Stalhammar, Gustav
    Robertson, Stephanie
    Wedlund, Lena
    Lippert, Michael
    Rantalainen, Mattias
    Bergh, Jonas
    Hartman, Johan
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2018, 72 (06) : 974 - 989
  • [6] An adaptive positivity thresholding method for automated Ki67 hotspot detection (AKHoD) in breast cancer biopsies
    Pilutti, David
    Della Mea, Vincenzo
    Pegolo, Enrico
    La Marra, Francesco
    Antoniazzi, Fulvio
    Di Loreto, Carla
    COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 2017, 61 : 28 - 34
  • [7] A methodology to ensure and improve accuracy of Ki67 labelling index estimation by automated digital image analysis in breast cancer tissue
    Arvydas Laurinavicius
    Benoit Plancoulaine
    Aida Laurinaviciene
    Paulette Herlin
    Raimundas Meskauskas
    Indra Baltrusaityte
    Justinas Besusparis
    Darius Dasevicius
    Nicolas Elie
    Yasir Iqbal
    Catherine Bor
    Ian O Ellis
    Breast Cancer Research, 16
  • [8] A methodology to ensure and improve accuracy of Ki67 labelling index estimation by automated digital image analysis in breast cancer tissue
    Laurinavicius, Arvydas
    Plancoulaine, Benoit
    Laurinaviciene, Aida
    Herlin, Paulette
    Meskauskas, Raimundas
    Baltrusaityte, Indra
    Besusparis, Justinas
    Dasevicius, Darius
    Elie, Nicolas
    Iqbal, Yasir
    Bor, Catherine
    Ellis, Ian O.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (02)
  • [9] Image Analysis in Digital Pathology: Combining Automated Assessment of Ki67 Staining Quality with Calculation of Ki67 Cell Proliferation Index
    Bengtsson, Ewert
    Ranefall, Petter
    CYTOMETRY PART A, 2019, 95A (07) : 714 - 716
  • [10] Digital quantification of Ki67 in breast cancer
    Rosario Taco, M. D.
    Soler, T.
    Petit, A.
    Perez, X.
    Falo, C.
    Matias-Guiu, X.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2016, 469 : S62 - S62