Development of the multiple scope transition method in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy

被引:1
|
作者
Kitano, Yuki [1 ,2 ]
Inoue, Yosuke [1 ]
Kobayashi, Hiroshi [1 ]
Kobayashi, Kosuke [1 ]
Oba, Atsushi [1 ]
Ono, Yoshihiro [1 ]
Sato, Takafumi [1 ]
Ito, Hiromichi [1 ]
Takahashi, Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Div Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg, 3-8-31 Ariake,Koto Ku, Tokyo, 1358550, Japan
[2] Kumamoto Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Gastroenterol Surg, Kumamoto, Japan
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2024年 / 38卷 / 10期
关键词
Robotic surgery; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Multiple scope transition; Patient-side assistant; SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS; SUPERIOR; CLASSIFICATION; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-024-11219-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundSince robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (R-PD) has emerged as a promising technique for treating periampullary tumors, optimal surgical views across various stages of the surgery are vital. This study aimed to describe the evolution and optimization of the multiple scope transition (MST) method using comprehensive videos and illustrations, particularly from the perspective of the patient-side assistants, to enhance the efficiency and safety of R-PD through its different phases.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 61 patients who underwent R-PD from April 2021 to May 2023.ResultsThe median total operation duration was 599 min (415-840 min). The median scope transition times for redocking from the left to central lower position, transition from the central lower to upper position, and port-hopping from the central to right position were 169 s (53-725 s), 55 s (26-165 s), and 120 s (41-260 s), respectively. Owing to the advancements in the scope transition procedures, these scope transition times became shorter with an increase in the number of experiences. No intraoperative complications relevant to scope transition was reported, and the incidence of significant postoperative complications greater than Grade IIIa of the Clavien-Dindo classification was 8.2%.ConclusionWe reported the established role and evolution of the MST method from the standpoint of the patient-side assistants. The comfortable surgical field expansion provided by the MST method can ensure the safe and widespread application of R-PD.
引用
收藏
页码:6169 / 6176
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mesopancreas level 3 dissection in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Shyr, Bor-Uei
    Shyr, Bor-Shiuan
    Chen, Shih-Chin
    Shyr, Yi-Ming
    Wang, Shin-E
    SURGERY, 2021, 169 (02) : 362 - 368
  • [32] DEVELOPMENT OF A ROBOTIC STANDARD ADDITION METHOD
    ECKERTTILOTTA, SE
    ISENHOUR, TL
    MARSHALL, JC
    ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1991, 254 (1-2) : 215 - 221
  • [33] Development of multiple robotic fish cooperation platform
    Shao, Jinyan
    Wang, Long
    Yu, Junzhi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 2007, 38 (03) : 257 - 268
  • [34] Total robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review of the literature
    Kornaropoulos, Michail
    Moris, Demetrios
    Beal, Eliza W.
    Makris, Marinos C.
    Mitrousias, Apostolos
    Petrou, Athanasios
    Felekouras, Evangelos
    Michalinos, Adamantios
    Vailas, Michail
    Schizas, Dimitrios
    Papalampros, Alexandros
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (11): : 4382 - 4392
  • [35] Early experience of laparoscopic and robotic hybrid pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Kim, Hongbeom
    Kim, Jae Ri
    Han, Youngmin
    Kwon, Wooil
    Kim, Sun-Whe
    Jang, Jin-Young
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2017, 13 (03):
  • [36] Chyle leakage after robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Shyr, Bor-Uei
    Shyr, Bor-Shiuan
    Chen, Shih-Chin
    Shyr, Yi-Ming
    Wang, Shin-E
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2020, 27 (05) : 273 - 279
  • [37] Internal Hernia Following Robotic Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Qin, Kai
    Wu, Zhichong
    Jin, Jiabin
    Shen, Baiyong
    Peng, Chenghong
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2018, 24 : 2287 - 2293
  • [38] Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Is the Future: Here and Now Discussion
    Hughes, Steven J.
    Merchant, Nipun B.
    Pitt, Henry A.
    Kooby, David A.
    Lillemoe, Keith D.
    Rosemurgy, Alexander S., II
    Lin, Edward
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2019, 228 (04) : 624 - 626
  • [39] Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a NSQIP Analysis
    Nassour, Ibrahim
    Wang, Sam C.
    Porembka, Matthew R.
    Yopp, Adam C.
    Choti, Michael A.
    Augustine, Mathew M.
    Polanco, Patricio M.
    Mansour, John C.
    Minter, Rebecca M.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2017, 21 (11) : 1784 - 1792
  • [40] Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Propensity-Matched Analysis to Open and Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy
    A. Floortje van Oosten
    Ding Ding
    Joseph R. Habib
    Ahmer Irfan
    Ryan K. Schmocker
    Elisabetta Sereni
    Benedict Kinny-Köster
    Michael Wright
    Vincent P. Groot
    I. Quintus Molenaar
    John L. Cameron
    Martin Makary
    Richard A. Burkhart
    William R. Burns
    Christopher L. Wolfgang
    Jin He
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2021, 25 : 1795 - 1804