Equity in Choosing Wisely and beyond: the effect of health literacy on healthcare decision-making and methods to support conversations about overuse

被引:1
|
作者
Muscat, Danielle M. [1 ]
Cvejic, Erin [2 ]
Smith, Jenna [1 ]
Thompson, Rachel [3 ]
Chang, Edward [1 ]
Tracy, Marguerite [2 ]
Zadro, Joshua [4 ]
Linder, Robyn [5 ]
Mccaffery, Kirsten [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney Hlth Literacy Lab, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Hlth Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Inst Musculoskeletal Hlth, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] NPS MedicineWise, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Decision making; Shared decision making; Communication; QUESTIONS; DISPARITIES; PHYSICIANS; INTENTION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017411
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To (a) examine whether the effect of the Choosing Wisely consumer questions on question-asking and shared decision-making (SDM) outcomes differs based on individuals' health literacy and (b) explore the relationship between health literacy, question-asking and other decision-making outcomes in the context of low value care. Methods Preplanned analysis of randomised trial data comparing: the Choosing Wisely questions, a SDM video, both interventions or control (no intervention). Randomisation was stratified by participant health literacy ('adequate' vs 'limited'), as assessed by the Newest Vital Sign. Main outcome measures Self-efficacy to ask questions and be involved in decision-making, and intention to engage in SDM. Participants 1439 Australian adults, recruited online. Results The effects of the Choosing Wisely questions and SDM video did not differ based on participants' health literacy for most primary or secondary outcomes (all two-way and three-way interactions p>0.05). Compared with individuals with 'adequate' health literacy, those with 'limited' health literacy had lower knowledge of SDM rights (82.1% vs 89.0%; 95% CI: 3.9% to 9.8%, p<0.001) and less positive attitudes towards SDM (48.3% vs 58.1%; 95% CI: 4.7% to 15.0%, p=0.0002). They were also more likely to indicate they would follow low-value treatment plans without further questioning (7.46/10 vs 6.94/10; 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.72, p<0.001) and generated fewer questions to ask a healthcare provider which aligned with the Choosing Wisely questions (chi(2) (1)=73.79, p<.001). On average, 67.7% of participants with 'limited' health literacy indicated that they would use video interventions again compared with 55.7% of individuals with 'adequate' health literacy. Conclusion Adults with limited health literacy continue to have lower scores on decision-making outcomes in the context of low value care. Ongoing work is needed to develop and test different intervention formats that support people with lower health literacy to engage in question asking and SDM.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [41] Feasibility and Acceptability of a Digital Intervention to Support Shared Decision-making in Children's and Young People's Mental Health: Mixed Methods Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Liverpool, Shaun
    Edbrooke-Childs, Julian
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2021, 5 (03)
  • [42] Towards appropriate information provision for and decision-making with patients with limited health literacy in hospital-based palliative care in Western countries: a scoping review into available communication strategies and tools for healthcare providers
    Janneke Noordman
    Liesbeth van Vliet
    Menno Kaunang
    Maria van den Muijsenbergh
    Gudule Boland
    Sandra van Dulmen
    BMC Palliative Care, 18
  • [43] Towards appropriate information provision for and decision-making with patients with limited health literacy in hospital-based palliative care in Western countries: a scoping review into available communication strategies and tools for healthcare providers
    Noordman, Janneke
    van Vliet, Liesbeth
    Kaunang, Menno
    van den Muijsenbergh, Maria
    Boland, Gudule
    van Dulmen, Sandra
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2019, 18 (1)
  • [44] Implementation and staff understanding of shared decision-making in the context of recovery-oriented care across US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units: a mixed-methods evaluation
    Eliacin, Johanne
    Carter, Jessica
    Bass, Emily
    Flanagan, Mindy
    Salyers, Michelle P.
    McGuire, Alan
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (05):
  • [45] The effect of case-based teaching method on professional competence and clinical decision-making levels of public health nursing students: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study
    Sumen, Adem
    Adibelli, Derya
    PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING, 2024, 41 (03) : 446 - 457
  • [46] Effect of health literacy and shared decision-making on choice of weight-loss plan among overweight or obese participants receiving a prototype artificial intelligence robot intervention facilitating weight-loss management decisions
    Chu, Yi-Tang
    Huang, Ru-Yi
    Chen, Tara Tai-Wen
    Lin, Wei-Hsuan
    Tang, James TaoQian
    Lin, Chi-Wei
    Huang, Chi-Hsien
    Lin, Chung-Ying
    Chen, Jung-Sheng
    Kurtz-Rossi, Sabrina
    Sorensen, Kristine
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2022, 8
  • [47] Researching, co-creating and testing innovations in paper-based health information systems (PHISICC) to support health workers' decision-making: protocol of a multi-country, transdisciplinary, mixed-methods research programme in three sub-Saharan countries
    Bosch-Capblanch, Xavier
    O'Donnell, David
    Krause, L. Kendall
    Auer, Christian
    Oyo-Ita, Angela
    Samba, Mamadou
    Matsinhe, Graca
    Garba, Abdullahi Bulama
    Rodriguez, Damaris
    Zuske, Meike
    Njepuome, Anthonia Ngozi
    Lee, Sofia Micael Mandjate
    Ross, Amanda
    Gajewski, Suzanne
    Muloliwa, Artur Manuel
    Yapi, Richard B.
    Brown, David W.
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [48] Researching, co-creating and testing innovations in paper-based health information systems (PHISICC) to support health workers’ decision-making: protocol of a multi-country, transdisciplinary, mixed-methods research programme in three sub-Saharan countries
    Xavier Bosch-Capblanch
    David O’Donnell
    L. Kendall Krause
    Christian Auer
    Angela Oyo-Ita
    Mamadou Samba
    Graça Matsinhe
    Abdullahi Bulama Garba
    Damaris Rodríguez
    Meike Zuske
    Anthonia Ngozi Njepuome
    Sofia Micael Mandjate Lee
    Amanda Ross
    Suzanne Gajewski
    Artur Manuel Muloliwa
    Richard B. Yapi
    David W. Brown
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 19