Equity in Choosing Wisely and beyond: the effect of health literacy on healthcare decision-making and methods to support conversations about overuse

被引:1
|
作者
Muscat, Danielle M. [1 ]
Cvejic, Erin [2 ]
Smith, Jenna [1 ]
Thompson, Rachel [3 ]
Chang, Edward [1 ]
Tracy, Marguerite [2 ]
Zadro, Joshua [4 ]
Linder, Robyn [5 ]
Mccaffery, Kirsten [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney Hlth Literacy Lab, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Hlth Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Inst Musculoskeletal Hlth, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] NPS MedicineWise, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Decision making; Shared decision making; Communication; QUESTIONS; DISPARITIES; PHYSICIANS; INTENTION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017411
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To (a) examine whether the effect of the Choosing Wisely consumer questions on question-asking and shared decision-making (SDM) outcomes differs based on individuals' health literacy and (b) explore the relationship between health literacy, question-asking and other decision-making outcomes in the context of low value care. Methods Preplanned analysis of randomised trial data comparing: the Choosing Wisely questions, a SDM video, both interventions or control (no intervention). Randomisation was stratified by participant health literacy ('adequate' vs 'limited'), as assessed by the Newest Vital Sign. Main outcome measures Self-efficacy to ask questions and be involved in decision-making, and intention to engage in SDM. Participants 1439 Australian adults, recruited online. Results The effects of the Choosing Wisely questions and SDM video did not differ based on participants' health literacy for most primary or secondary outcomes (all two-way and three-way interactions p>0.05). Compared with individuals with 'adequate' health literacy, those with 'limited' health literacy had lower knowledge of SDM rights (82.1% vs 89.0%; 95% CI: 3.9% to 9.8%, p<0.001) and less positive attitudes towards SDM (48.3% vs 58.1%; 95% CI: 4.7% to 15.0%, p=0.0002). They were also more likely to indicate they would follow low-value treatment plans without further questioning (7.46/10 vs 6.94/10; 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.72, p<0.001) and generated fewer questions to ask a healthcare provider which aligned with the Choosing Wisely questions (chi(2) (1)=73.79, p<.001). On average, 67.7% of participants with 'limited' health literacy indicated that they would use video interventions again compared with 55.7% of individuals with 'adequate' health literacy. Conclusion Adults with limited health literacy continue to have lower scores on decision-making outcomes in the context of low value care. Ongoing work is needed to develop and test different intervention formats that support people with lower health literacy to engage in question asking and SDM.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [31] Learning About the Current State of Digital Mental Health Interventions for Canadian Youth to Inform Future Decision-Making: Mixed Methods Study
    Kemp, Jessica
    Chorney, Jill
    Kassam, Iman
    MacDonald, Julie
    MacDonald, Tara
    Wozney, Lori
    Strudwick, Gillian
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (10)
  • [32] Multi-Criteria Clinical Decision Support A Primer on the Use of Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Methods to Promote Evidence-Based, Patient-Centered Healthcare
    Dolan, James G.
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2010, 3 (04): : 229 - 248
  • [33] How and why front-line health workers (did not) use a multifaceted mHealth intervention to support maternal and neonatal healthcare decision-making in Ghana
    Amoakoh, Hannah Brown
    Klipstein-Grobusch, Kerstin
    Ansah, Evelyn Korkor
    Grobbee, Diederick E.
    Yveoo, Linda
    Agyepong, Irene
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2019, 4 (02):
  • [34] Exploring the preferences of involved health professionals regarding the implementation of an online decision aid to support couples during reproductive decision-making in hereditary cancer: a mixed methods approach
    Kelly Reumkens
    Christine E. M. de Die-Smulders
    Liesbeth A. D. M. van Osch
    Familial Cancer, 2019, 18 : 285 - 291
  • [35] Exploring the preferences of involved health professionals regarding the implementation of an online decision aid to support couples during reproductive decision-making in hereditary cancer: a mixed methods approach
    Reumkens, Kelly
    de Die-Smulders, Christine E. M.
    van Osch, Liesbeth A. D. M.
    FAMILIAL CANCER, 2019, 18 (02) : 285 - 291
  • [36] Tapping into the power of coproduction and knowledge mobilisation: Exploration of a facilitated interactive group learning approach to support equity-sensitive decision-making in local health and care services
    Cloke, Jane
    Hassan, Shaima
    Goodall, Mark
    Ring, Adele
    Saini, Pooja
    Tahir, Naheed
    Gabbay, Mark
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2023, 26 (04) : 1692 - 1702
  • [37] The mediating effect of e-health literacy on social support and behavioral decision-making on glycemic management in pregnant women with gestational diabetes: a cross-sectional study (vol 12, 416620, 2024)
    Yumei, P.
    Huiyang, K.
    Liqin, S.
    Meijing, Z.
    Yaping, X.
    Huifen, Z.
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 12
  • [38] Promoting Awareness of Key Resources for Evidence-Informed Decision-making in Public Health: An Evaluation of a Webinar Series about Knowledge Translation Methods and Tools
    Yost, Jennifer
    Mackintosh, Jeannie
    Read, Kristin
    Dobbins, Maureen
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 4
  • [39] MODELLING THE EFFECT OF MULTI-INDICATION TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIMORBIDITY USING POPULATION-SCALE LINKED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS FOR HEALTHCARE POLICY AND DECISION-MAKING
    Owen, R.
    Lyons, J.
    Akbari, A.
    Lyons, R. A.
    Abrams, K.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S471 - S471
  • [40] The impact of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on cystic fibrosis health-related quality of life and decision-making about daily treatment regimens: a mixed methods exploratory study
    Basile, Melissa
    Polo, Jennifer
    Henthorne, Katherine
    DeCelie-Germana, Joan
    Galvin, Susan
    Wang, Janice
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN CHRONIC DISEASE, 2024, 15