Equity in Choosing Wisely and beyond: the effect of health literacy on healthcare decision-making and methods to support conversations about overuse

被引:1
|
作者
Muscat, Danielle M. [1 ]
Cvejic, Erin [2 ]
Smith, Jenna [1 ]
Thompson, Rachel [3 ]
Chang, Edward [1 ]
Tracy, Marguerite [2 ]
Zadro, Joshua [4 ]
Linder, Robyn [5 ]
Mccaffery, Kirsten [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney Hlth Literacy Lab, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Hlth Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Inst Musculoskeletal Hlth, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] NPS MedicineWise, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Decision making; Shared decision making; Communication; QUESTIONS; DISPARITIES; PHYSICIANS; INTENTION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017411
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To (a) examine whether the effect of the Choosing Wisely consumer questions on question-asking and shared decision-making (SDM) outcomes differs based on individuals' health literacy and (b) explore the relationship between health literacy, question-asking and other decision-making outcomes in the context of low value care. Methods Preplanned analysis of randomised trial data comparing: the Choosing Wisely questions, a SDM video, both interventions or control (no intervention). Randomisation was stratified by participant health literacy ('adequate' vs 'limited'), as assessed by the Newest Vital Sign. Main outcome measures Self-efficacy to ask questions and be involved in decision-making, and intention to engage in SDM. Participants 1439 Australian adults, recruited online. Results The effects of the Choosing Wisely questions and SDM video did not differ based on participants' health literacy for most primary or secondary outcomes (all two-way and three-way interactions p>0.05). Compared with individuals with 'adequate' health literacy, those with 'limited' health literacy had lower knowledge of SDM rights (82.1% vs 89.0%; 95% CI: 3.9% to 9.8%, p<0.001) and less positive attitudes towards SDM (48.3% vs 58.1%; 95% CI: 4.7% to 15.0%, p=0.0002). They were also more likely to indicate they would follow low-value treatment plans without further questioning (7.46/10 vs 6.94/10; 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.72, p<0.001) and generated fewer questions to ask a healthcare provider which aligned with the Choosing Wisely questions (chi(2) (1)=73.79, p<.001). On average, 67.7% of participants with 'limited' health literacy indicated that they would use video interventions again compared with 55.7% of individuals with 'adequate' health literacy. Conclusion Adults with limited health literacy continue to have lower scores on decision-making outcomes in the context of low value care. Ongoing work is needed to develop and test different intervention formats that support people with lower health literacy to engage in question asking and SDM.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Financial Health Literacy and the Shared Decision-Making Process in Healthcare
    O'Mara, Caitlin S.
    Young, Justin P.
    Winkelmann, Zachary K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (11)
  • [2] Development of a shared decision-making tool to support patients and their healthcare provider in choosing the best inhaler device
    Metting, Esther I.
    Van Dijk, Lise
    El Messlaki, Halima
    Luers, Jos
    Kock, Janwillem
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2018, 52
  • [3] Health Literacy and Shared Decision-making: Exploring the Relationship to Enable Meaningful Patient Engagement in Healthcare
    Muscat, Danielle M.
    Shepherd, Heather L.
    Nutbeam, Don
    Trevena, Lyndal
    McCaffery, Kirsten J.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 36 (02) : 521 - 524
  • [4] Health Literacy and Shared Decision-making: Exploring the Relationship to Enable Meaningful Patient Engagement in Healthcare
    Danielle M. Muscat
    Heather L. Shepherd
    Don Nutbeam
    Lyndal Trevena
    Kirsten J. McCaffery
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2021, 36 : 521 - 524
  • [5] Effect of Health Literacy on Decision-Making Preferences among Medically Underserved Patients
    Seo, Joann
    Goodman, Melody S.
    Politi, Mary
    Blanchard, Melvin
    Kaphingst, Kimberly A.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2016, 36 (04) : 550 - 556
  • [6] The Moderating Effect of Financial Literacy on the Relationship Between Decision-Making Tools and Equity Returns in the Indian Secondary Equity Market
    Isidore, Renu
    Arun, C. Joe
    REVISTA FINANZAS Y POLITICA ECONOMICA, 2023, 15 (01): : 185 - 211
  • [7] Health care decision-making by adults with intellectual disability and the effect of decision-support
    Schossleitner, K.
    Weber, G.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2014, 27 (04) : 334 - 334
  • [8] Development of a new theoretical model on health literacy and informed decision-making about lung cancer screening
    Platter, Heather Nicole
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (16)
  • [9] Data counselling: providing support for decision-making about genomic and health data sharing for research
    de Freitas, Claudia
    Pinho, Ana
    Henriques, Ana
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2024, 32 : 72 - 72
  • [10] Moving beyond the function of the health behaviour: The effect of message frame on behavioural decision-making
    Bartels, Roger D.
    Kelly, Kristina M.
    Rothman, Alexander J.
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2010, 25 (07) : 821 - 838