Increase in Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy Among Patients with Invasive Breast Cancer or Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Who is Left Behind?

被引:1
|
作者
Booth, Sara [1 ]
Freeman, Jincong Q. [1 ,2 ]
Li, James L. [1 ,3 ]
Huo, Dezheng [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Ctr Hlth & Social Sci, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Ctr Clin Canc Genet & Global Hlth, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
LUMPECTOMY PLUS TAMOXIFEN; RADIOTHERAPY HYPOFRACTIONATION; UK STANDARDIZATION; UNITED-STATES; IMPLICIT BIAS; FOLLOW-UP; DATA-BASE; IRRADIATION; CARE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.prro.2024.04.010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We aimed to update the trend of hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HF-WBI) use over time in the US and examine factors associated with lack of HF-WBI adoption for patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer (IBC) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) undergoing a lumpectomy. Methods and materials: Among patients who underwent a lumpectomy, we identified 928,034 patients with early-stage IBC and 330,964 patients with DCIS in the 2004 to 2020 National Cancer Database. We defined HF-WBI as 2.5-3.33 Gy/fraction to the breast and conventionally fractionated WBI as 1.8-2.0 Gy/fraction. We evaluated the trend of HF-WBI utilization using a generalized linear model with the log link and binomial distribution. Factors associated with HF-WBI utilization were assessed using multivariable logistic regression in patients diagnosed between 2018 and 2020. Results: Among patients with IBC, HF-WBI use has significantly increased from 0.7% in 2004 to 63.9% in 2020. Similarly, HF-WBI usage among patients with DCIS has also increased significantly from 0.4% in 2004 to 56.6% in 2020. Black patients with IBC were less likely than White patients to receive HF-WBI (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.81; 95% CI, 0.77-0.85). Community cancer programs were less likely to administer HF-WBI to patients with IBC (AOR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.77-0.84) and to those with DCIS (AOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.96) than academic/research programs. Younger age, positive nodes, larger tumor size, low volume programs, and facility location were also associated with lack of HF-WBI adoption in both patient cohorts. Conclusions: HF-WBI utilization among postlumpectomy patients has significantly increased from 2004 to 2020 and can finally be considered standard of care in the US. We found substantial disparities in adoption within patient and facility subgroups. Reducing disparities in HF-WBI adoption has the potential to further alleviate health care costs while improving patients' quality of life. (c) 2024 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:e305 / e323
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer invasive ductal carcinoma with ductal carcinoma in situ
    Liu, Yang
    Yu, Tong
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 149 (13) : 11181 - 11191
  • [42] Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer invasive ductal carcinoma with ductal carcinoma in situ
    Yang Liu
    Tong Yu
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2023, 149 : 11181 - 11191
  • [43] Ductal carcinoma in situ as a risk factor for subsequent occurrence of invasive breast cancer
    Buckley, E.
    Sullivan, T.
    Hiller, J.
    Farshid, G.
    Roder, D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 : S120 - S120
  • [44] Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: comparative genomic sequencing
    Doebar, S. C.
    Krol, N. M.
    van Marion, R.
    Brouwer, R. W. W.
    van Ijcken, W. F. J.
    Martens, J. M.
    Dinjens, W. N. M.
    van Deurzen, C. H. M.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2019, 474 (02) : 247 - 251
  • [45] Ductal carcinoma in situ: a risk prediction model for the underestimation of invasive breast cancer
    Park, Ko Woon
    Kim, Seon Woo
    Han, Heewon
    Park, Minsu
    Han, Boo-Kyung
    Ko, Eun Young
    Choi, Ji Soo
    Cho, Eun Yoon
    Cho, Soo Youn
    Ko, Eun Sook
    NPJ BREAST CANCER, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [46] Genes regulating the progression of human ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer
    Lee, Sangjun
    Stewart, Sheila
    Luo, Jingqin
    Medina, Daniel
    Allred, D. Craig
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 71
  • [47] Molecular diversity in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and early invasive breast cancer
    Muggerud, Aslaug Aamodt
    Hallett, Michael
    Johnsen, Hilde
    Kleivi, Kristine
    Zhou, Wenjing
    Tahmasebpoor, Simin
    Amini, Rose-Marie
    Botling, Johan
    Borresen-Dale, Anne-Lise
    Sorlie, Therese
    Warnberg, Fredrik
    MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY, 2010, 4 (04): : 357 - 368
  • [48] Characteristics of Microinvasive Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Versus Noninvasive and Invasive Breast Cancer
    Strang, Lauren R.
    Sun, James
    Sun, Weihong
    Boulware, David
    Kiluk, John V.
    Lee, M. Catherine
    Khazai, Laila
    Laronga, Christine
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 254 : 378 - 383
  • [49] Can Radiologists Predict the Presence of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Invasive Breast Cancer?
    Aminololama-Shakeri, Shadi
    Flowers, Chris I.
    McLaren, Christine E.
    Wisner, Dorota J.
    de Guzman, Jade
    Campbell, Joan E.
    Bassett, Lawrence W.
    Ojeda-Fournier, Haydee
    Gerlach, Karen
    Hargreaves, Jonathan
    Elson, Sarah L.
    Retallack, Hanna
    Joe, Bonnie N.
    Feig, Stephen A.
    Wells, Colin J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 208 (04) : 933 - 939
  • [50] Serum Autoantibody Signature of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Progression to Invasive Breast Cancer
    Mange, Alain
    Lacombe, Jerome
    Bascoul-Mollevi, Caroline
    Jarlier, Marta
    Lamy, Pierre-Jean
    Rouanet, Philippe
    Maudelonde, Thierry
    Solassol, Jerome
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 18 (07) : 1992 - 2000