Increase in Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy Among Patients with Invasive Breast Cancer or Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Who is Left Behind?

被引:1
|
作者
Booth, Sara [1 ]
Freeman, Jincong Q. [1 ,2 ]
Li, James L. [1 ,3 ]
Huo, Dezheng [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Ctr Hlth & Social Sci, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Ctr Clin Canc Genet & Global Hlth, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
LUMPECTOMY PLUS TAMOXIFEN; RADIOTHERAPY HYPOFRACTIONATION; UK STANDARDIZATION; UNITED-STATES; IMPLICIT BIAS; FOLLOW-UP; DATA-BASE; IRRADIATION; CARE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.prro.2024.04.010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We aimed to update the trend of hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HF-WBI) use over time in the US and examine factors associated with lack of HF-WBI adoption for patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer (IBC) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) undergoing a lumpectomy. Methods and materials: Among patients who underwent a lumpectomy, we identified 928,034 patients with early-stage IBC and 330,964 patients with DCIS in the 2004 to 2020 National Cancer Database. We defined HF-WBI as 2.5-3.33 Gy/fraction to the breast and conventionally fractionated WBI as 1.8-2.0 Gy/fraction. We evaluated the trend of HF-WBI utilization using a generalized linear model with the log link and binomial distribution. Factors associated with HF-WBI utilization were assessed using multivariable logistic regression in patients diagnosed between 2018 and 2020. Results: Among patients with IBC, HF-WBI use has significantly increased from 0.7% in 2004 to 63.9% in 2020. Similarly, HF-WBI usage among patients with DCIS has also increased significantly from 0.4% in 2004 to 56.6% in 2020. Black patients with IBC were less likely than White patients to receive HF-WBI (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.81; 95% CI, 0.77-0.85). Community cancer programs were less likely to administer HF-WBI to patients with IBC (AOR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.77-0.84) and to those with DCIS (AOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.96) than academic/research programs. Younger age, positive nodes, larger tumor size, low volume programs, and facility location were also associated with lack of HF-WBI adoption in both patient cohorts. Conclusions: HF-WBI utilization among postlumpectomy patients has significantly increased from 2004 to 2020 and can finally be considered standard of care in the US. We found substantial disparities in adoption within patient and facility subgroups. Reducing disparities in HF-WBI adoption has the potential to further alleviate health care costs while improving patients' quality of life. (c) 2024 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:e305 / e323
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk Factor of Invasive Breast Cancer in Patients with Preoperative Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ
    Shin, Sun Hyoung
    Kim, Byung Chun
    Song, Young Ju
    Yoon, Hyun Chul
    Cho, Jin Seong
    Park, Min Ho
    Yoon, Jung Han
    Jegal, Young Jong
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SURGICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 80 (02): : 90 - 95
  • [22] Risk factors of second breast cancer among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ
    Liu, Ying
    Colditz, Graham
    MOLECULAR CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 11
  • [23] Comparison of risk factors for ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer
    Kerlikowske, K
    Barclay, J
    Grady, D
    Sickles, EA
    Ernster, V
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1997, 89 (01): : 76 - 82
  • [24] The molecular journey from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer
    Wiechmann, Lisa
    Kuerer, Henry M.
    CANCER, 2008, 112 (10) : 2130 - 2142
  • [25] Comparison of molecular phenotypes of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer
    Tamimi, Rulla M.
    Baer, Heather J.
    Marotti, Jonathan
    Galan, Mark
    Galaburda, Laurie
    Fu, Yineng
    Deitz, Anne C.
    Connolly, James L.
    Schnitt, Stuart J.
    Colditz, Graham A.
    Collins, Laura C.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 10 (04):
  • [26] Genetic differences between ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer
    Allred, DC
    Tsimelzon, A
    Mohsin, SK
    Hilsenbeck, SG
    Medina, D
    Osborne, CK
    O'Connell, P
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2003, 82 : S10 - S10
  • [27] Mechanisms of progression of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast to invasive cancer - A hypothesis
    Cocker, Rubina
    Oktay, Maja H.
    Sunkara, Jaya L.
    Koss, Leopold G.
    MEDICAL HYPOTHESES, 2007, 69 (01) : 57 - 63
  • [28] Progression from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: Revisited
    Cowell, Catherine F.
    Weigelt, Britta
    Sakr, Rita A.
    Ng, Charlotte K. Y.
    Hicks, James
    King, Tari A.
    Reis-Filho, Jorge S.
    MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY, 2013, 7 (05) : 859 - 869
  • [29] Does concomitant ductal carcinoma in situ affect the clinical outcome in breast cancer patients with invasive ductal carcinoma: An Asian perspective
    Lee, Wai Peng
    Shetty, Spoorthi Sudhakar
    Seah, Chin Mui Jaime
    Tan, Pei Ting
    Tan, Su Ming
    CANCER REPORTS, 2022, 5 (09)
  • [30] Outcome after invasive recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast
    Romero, L
    Klein, L
    Ye, W
    Holmes, D
    Soni, R
    Silberman, H
    Lagios, MD
    Silverstein, MJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 188 (04): : 371 - 376