Validation of automated registration of intraoral scan onto Cone Beam Computed Tomography for an efficient digital dental workflow

被引:6
|
作者
Preda, Flavia [1 ,2 ]
Nogueira-Reis, Fernanda [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Stanciu, Eugen Marius [4 ]
Smolders, Andreas [5 ]
Jacobs, Reinhilde [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Shaheen, Eman [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Med, Dept Imaging & Pathol, OMFS IMPATH Res Grp, Kapucijnenvoer 33, BE-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Leuven, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Kapucijnenvoer 33, BE-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[3] Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Dept Oral Diag, Div Oral Radiol, Ave Limeira 901, BR-13414903 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
[4] Private Dent Lab DKdent, Bucharest, Romania
[5] Paul Scherrer Inst, Villigen, Switzerland
[6] Karolinska Inst, Dept Dent Med, Box 4064, SE-14104 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Automated registration; Intra-oral scan; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Three-dimensional imaging; Digital workflow; SURGERY; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105282
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to validate a newly developed automated method (Virtual Patient Creator, Relu, Leuven, Belgium) for multimodal registration of intraoral scan (IOS) and Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Methods: Time point-matched IOS and CBCT scans of forty patients with variable dental statuses (natural dentition, partial edentulism, presence of orthodontic brackets) were selected. Three operators registered IOS and CBCT scans using three state-of-the-art softwares for orthodontics and orthognathic surgery (IPS Case Designer, Proplan CMF and Dolphin Imaging). Automated registration was compared to expert-performed semiautomated registration. Time consumption, accuracy, and consistency of the proposed method were benchmarked to semi-automated registration using root mean squared error calculations. The robustness of the automated registration was evaluated in relationship to the dental status of the patients in the dataset. Results: On average, automatic registration was 7.3 times faster than semi-automatic registration performed by an expert operator. Automatic registration yielded reliable results with low deviation errors compared to the differently skilled operators and semi-automated software. Automated registration surpassed human variability as expressed in intra- and inter-operator inconsistencies. Neither orthodontic brackets nor edentulism impacted registration accuracy. Conclusions: The presented automated method for IOS and CBCT registration is faster, equally accurate, and more consistent than semi-automatic registration performed by an expert or an occasional operator. With similar results among cases with different dental statuses, the clinical feasibility of the method is ensured. Clinical significance: A validated automated registration method provides accurate and fast multimodal image integration without incorporating operator bias at the very start of the digital workflows for dentistry, periodontics, orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Detection of Natural and Simulated Periodontal Defects Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Intraoral Radiography
    Misirli, Melis
    Aksoy, Secil
    Tumer, Hayriye
    Bilginaylar, Kani
    Karaoglulari, Suzan
    Berberoglu, Atilla
    Orhan, Kaan
    Icen, Murat
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 8 (01): : 38 - 43
  • [32] A New Method for the Integration of Digital Dental Models and Cone-beam Computed Tomography Images
    Lin, Hsiu-Hsia
    Chiang, Wen-Chung
    Lo, Lun-Jou
    Wang, Chien-Hsuan
    2013 35TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2013, : 2328 - 2331
  • [33] Clinical guidelines for dental cone-beam computed tomography
    Takafumi Hayashi
    Yoshinori Arai
    Toru Chikui
    Sachiko Hayashi-Sakai
    Kazuya Honda
    Hiroko Indo
    Taisuke Kawai
    Kaoru Kobayashi
    Shumei Murakami
    Masako Nagasawa
    Munetaka Naitoh
    Eiji Nakayama
    Yutaka Nikkuni
    Hideyoshi Nishiyama
    Noriaki Shoji
    Shigeaki Suenaga
    Ray Tanaka
    Oral Radiology, 2018, 34 : 89 - 104
  • [34] Simulated Dental Cone Beam Computed Tomography Using Timepix
    Baek, Seung H.
    Uher, Josef
    2013 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (NSS/MIC), 2013,
  • [35] Quality Control in Dental Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
    Huang, Jin-Feng
    Chen, Xiao-Zhao
    Wang, Hong
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (17):
  • [36] Cone beam computed tomography and its application in dental practice
    Correia, Francisco
    Salgado, Abel
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE ESTOMATOLOGIA MEDICINA DENTARIA E CIRURGIA MAXILOFACIAL, 2012, 53 (01): : 47 - 52
  • [37] Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanning and Diagnosis for Dental Implants
    Greenberg, Alex M.
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 27 (02) : 185 - +
  • [38] Clinical guidelines for dental cone-beam computed tomography
    Hayashi, Takafumi
    Arai, Yoshinori
    Chikui, Toru
    Hayashi-Sakai, Sachiko
    Honda, Kazuya
    Indo, Hiroko
    Kawai, Taisuke
    Kobayashi, Kaoru
    Murakami, Shumei
    Nagasawa, Masako
    Naitoh, Munetaka
    Nakayama, Eiji
    Nikkuni, Yutaka
    Nishiyama, Hideyoshi
    Shoji, Noriaki
    Suenaga, Shigeaki
    Tanaka, Ray
    ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 34 (02) : 89 - 104
  • [39] Diagnosis and Management of Traumatic Dental Injuries Using Intraoral Radiography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography: An In Vivo Investigation
    Patel, Shanon
    Puri, Taranpreet
    Mannocci, Francesco
    Navai, Aram
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2021, 47 (06) : 914 - 923
  • [40] Comparative dosimetry of dental cone beam computed tomography, panoramic radiography, and multislice computed tomography
    Sezgin, Omer Said
    Kayipmaz, Sadettin
    Yasar, Dogan
    Yilmaz, Ahmet Berhan
    Ozturk, Mehmet Halil
    ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 28 (01) : 32 - 37