Validation of automated registration of intraoral scan onto Cone Beam Computed Tomography for an efficient digital dental workflow

被引:6
|
作者
Preda, Flavia [1 ,2 ]
Nogueira-Reis, Fernanda [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Stanciu, Eugen Marius [4 ]
Smolders, Andreas [5 ]
Jacobs, Reinhilde [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Shaheen, Eman [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Med, Dept Imaging & Pathol, OMFS IMPATH Res Grp, Kapucijnenvoer 33, BE-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Leuven, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Kapucijnenvoer 33, BE-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[3] Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Dept Oral Diag, Div Oral Radiol, Ave Limeira 901, BR-13414903 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
[4] Private Dent Lab DKdent, Bucharest, Romania
[5] Paul Scherrer Inst, Villigen, Switzerland
[6] Karolinska Inst, Dept Dent Med, Box 4064, SE-14104 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Automated registration; Intra-oral scan; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Three-dimensional imaging; Digital workflow; SURGERY; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105282
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to validate a newly developed automated method (Virtual Patient Creator, Relu, Leuven, Belgium) for multimodal registration of intraoral scan (IOS) and Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Methods: Time point-matched IOS and CBCT scans of forty patients with variable dental statuses (natural dentition, partial edentulism, presence of orthodontic brackets) were selected. Three operators registered IOS and CBCT scans using three state-of-the-art softwares for orthodontics and orthognathic surgery (IPS Case Designer, Proplan CMF and Dolphin Imaging). Automated registration was compared to expert-performed semiautomated registration. Time consumption, accuracy, and consistency of the proposed method were benchmarked to semi-automated registration using root mean squared error calculations. The robustness of the automated registration was evaluated in relationship to the dental status of the patients in the dataset. Results: On average, automatic registration was 7.3 times faster than semi-automatic registration performed by an expert operator. Automatic registration yielded reliable results with low deviation errors compared to the differently skilled operators and semi-automated software. Automated registration surpassed human variability as expressed in intra- and inter-operator inconsistencies. Neither orthodontic brackets nor edentulism impacted registration accuracy. Conclusions: The presented automated method for IOS and CBCT registration is faster, equally accurate, and more consistent than semi-automatic registration performed by an expert or an occasional operator. With similar results among cases with different dental statuses, the clinical feasibility of the method is ensured. Clinical significance: A validated automated registration method provides accurate and fast multimodal image integration without incorporating operator bias at the very start of the digital workflows for dentistry, periodontics, orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Positional accuracy of a prosthetic treatment plan incorporated into a cone beam computed tomography scan using surface scan registration
    Jamjoom, Faris Z.
    Kim, Do-Gyoon
    McGlumphy, Edwin A.
    Lee, Damian J.
    Yilmaz, Burak
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2018, 120 (03): : 367 - 374
  • [22] Comparison of intraoral digital radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in the measurement of periodontal bone defects
    Abdinian, Mehrdad
    Yaghini, Jaber
    Jazi, Leila
    DENTAL AND MEDICAL PROBLEMS, 2020, 57 (03) : 269 - 273
  • [23] Dental long axes using digital dental models compared to cone-beam computed tomography
    Cong, Amalia
    Massaro, Camila
    de Oliveira Ruellas, Antonio Carlos
    Barkley, Mary
    Yatabe, Marilia
    Bianchi, Jonas
    Ioshida, Marcos
    Alvarez, Maria Antonia
    Fernando Aristizabal, Juan
    Rey, Diego
    Cevidanes, Lucia
    ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2022, 25 (01) : 64 - 72
  • [24] Registration accuracy between intraoral-scanned and cone-beam computed tomography-scanned crowns in various registration methods
    Lim, Seung-Weon
    Hwang, Hyeon-Shik
    Cho, Il-Sik
    Baek, Seung-Hak
    Cho, Jin-Hyoung
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2020, 157 (03) : 348 - 356
  • [25] Stereotactic registration using cone-beam computed tomography
    Carlson, Jonathan Dennis
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 182 : 107 - 111
  • [26] Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and a Laser Intraoral Scanner in Virtual Dental Implant Surgery: Part 1
    Lee, Cameron Y. S.
    Ganz, Scott D.
    Wong, Natalie
    Suzuki, Jon B.
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2012, 21 (04) : 265 - 271
  • [27] Influence of scan mode (180°/360°) of the cone beam computed tomography for preoperative dental implant measurements
    Neves, Frederico S.
    Vasconcelos, Taruska V.
    Campos, Paulo S. F.
    Haiter-Neto, Francisco
    Freitas, Deborah Q.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (02) : E155 - E158
  • [28] Evaluation of gingival thickness obtained from intraoral scanning registration with cone beam computed tomography at different acquisition modes
    Marinho-Vieira, Luiz Eduardo
    Pinheiro, Maria Clara Rodrigues
    Freitas, Deborah Queiroz
    Jacobs, Reinhilde
    de Oliveira-Santos, Christiano
    Sverzut, Alexander Tadeu
    Oliveira, Matheus L.
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2025, 139 (01): : 101 - 110
  • [29] Automatic multimodal registration of cone-beam computed tomography and intraoral scans: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zheng, Qianhan
    Wu, Yongjia
    Chen, Jiahao
    Wang, Xiaozhe
    Zhou, Mengqi
    Li, Huimin
    Lin, Jiaqi
    Zhang, Weifang
    Chen, Xuepeng
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2025, 29 (02)
  • [30] Comparison between cone-beam computed tomography and intraoral digital radiography for assessment of tooth root lesions
    Kumar, Vandana
    Gossett, Lauren
    Blattner, Ashley
    Iwasaki, Laura R.
    Williams, Karen
    Nickel, Jeffrey C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 139 (06) : E533 - E541