Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Nursing Decision-Making Instrument Into European Portuguese

被引:0
|
作者
Paiva, Ivo Cristiano Soares [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Neves, Teresa Margarida Almeida [4 ]
Ventura, Filipa Isabel Quaresma Santos [5 ]
Vilela, Antonio Carlos Lopes [6 ,7 ]
Moreira, Isabel Maria Pinheiro Borges [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Sch Med & Biomed Sci, ICBAS, Ave Bissaya Barreto S-N, P-3004011 Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Nursing Sch Coimbra, Ave BissayaBarreto S-N, P-3004011 Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Nursing Sch Coimbra, Hlth Sci Res Unit Nursing, Ave BissayaBarreto S-N, P-3004011 Coimbra, Portugal
[4] Nursing Sch Coimbra, Hlth Sci Res Unit Nursing, Coimbra, Portugal
[5] Nursing Sch Coimbra, Hlth Sci Res Unit Nursing, Coimbra, Portugal
[6] Nursing Sch Porto, Porto, Portugal
[7] CINTESIS Res Ctr Hlth Technol & Serv, Porto, Portugal
来源
SAGE OPEN NURSING | 2024年 / 10卷
关键词
decision making; validation study; factor analysis; statistical; psychometrics; nursing;
D O I
10.1177/23779608241278611
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Introduction Nurses are continually faced with multiple demands to make decisions in their clinical practice. The Nursing Decision-Making Instrument (NDMI) assesses nurses' decision-making styles during the several stages of this process.Objectives To adapt the NDMI into European Portuguese and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version in a population of Portuguese nurses.Methods Descriptive study design was used to examine psychometric properties of NDMI. Nonprobability convenience sample of 339 Portuguese direct-care nurses. Data were collected using a questionnaire comprising sociodemographic and professional data and the NDMI-Portuguese version (NDMI-PT). An exploratory factor analysis (EFA; n = 125) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n = 214) were carried out using IBM SPSS (v. 24) and AMOS (v. 22).Results The EFA revealed a structure of four latent factors, which represent the reorganized stages of the decision-making process. The CFA found a good overall fit of the model (chi 2/df = 2.13; comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.91; goodness of fit index [GFI] = 0.82; Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI] = 0.90; root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.07; maximum-likelihood expected cross-validation index [MECVI] = 3.13). The psychometric analysis of the theoretical structure revealed that the four factors reflect the decision-making stages and have a better overall fit than the empirical structure (chi 2/df = 1.82; CFI = 0.94; GFI = 0.86; TLI = 0.93; RMSEA = 0.06; MECVI = 2.55). The analysis of the construct reliability of the NDMI-PT revealed that the overall internal consistency was excellent (alpha=0.96).Conclusions This study revealed that the empirical and theoretical structures were appropriate and valid for the sample under analysis. The NDMI-PT is a reliable and valid tool for assessing nurses' decision-making styles. Studies should be conducted to gain further insight into the robustness of this validated tool.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Scale
    Kouravand, Zhaleh
    Aein, Fereshteh
    Ebadi, Abbas
    Yadegarfar, Ghasem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT, 2021, 29 (03) : 391 - 407
  • [2] Psychometric Evaluation of the Shared Decision-Making Instrument-Revised
    Bartlett, Jacqueline A.
    Peterson, Jane A.
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2013, 35 (02) : 193 - 213
  • [3] European Portuguese adaptation and validation of dilemmas used to assess moral decision-making
    Fernandes, Carina
    Goncalves, Ana Ribeiro
    Pasion, Rita
    Ferreira-Santos, Fernando
    Paiva, Tiago Oliveira
    Melo e Castro, Joana
    Barbosa, Fernando
    Martins, Isabel Pavao
    Marques-Teixeira, Joao
    [J]. TRENDS IN PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2018, 40 (01) : 38 - 46
  • [4] Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Evaluation of the Brazilian Portuguese Version of the Quality in Psychiatric Care-Outpatients Instrument
    Lundqvist, Lars-Olov
    Silva, Naiara Gajo
    Barros, Sonia
    Schroder, Agneta
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (07)
  • [5] Decision-making theories and career assessment: A psychometric evaluation of the decision making inventory
    Hardin, EE
    Leong, FTL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CAREER ASSESSMENT, 2004, 12 (01) : 51 - 64
  • [6] A psychometric evaluation of the General Decision-Making Style Inventory
    Loo, R
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2000, 29 (05) : 895 - 905
  • [7] Evaluation of the California Parole Violation Decision-Making Instrument (PVDMI)
    Turner, Susan
    Braithwaite, Helen
    Kearney, Lauren
    Murphy, Amy
    Haerle, Darin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRIME & JUSTICE, 2012, 35 (02): : 269 - 295
  • [8] NURSING AS A DECISION-MAKING SYSTEM
    VIAN, F
    POLETTI, P
    [J]. SYSTEM SCIENCE IN HEALTH CARE, 2: HEALTH CARE SYSTEM AND ACTORS, 1988, 139 : 689 - 692
  • [9] Decision-Making in Nursing Practice
    Hogan, MaryAnn
    [J]. NURSING RESEARCH, 2016, 65 (02) : E57 - E58
  • [10] Decision-making model for nursing
    Bohinc, M
    Gradisar, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 2003, 33 (12): : 627 - 629