Psychometric Evaluation of the Shared Decision-Making Instrument-Revised

被引：6
|
作者：
Bartlett, Jacqueline A. [1 ]
Peterson, Jane A. [2 ]
机构：
[1] Childrens Mercy Hosp & Clin, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
[2] Univ Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, MO USA
来源：
WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH | 2013年 / 35卷 / 02期
关键词：
instrument development; methods; immune; clinical focus; shared decision-making; community; location of care; school nurses; pediatrics; population focus; PAPILLOMAVIRUS HPV VACCINE; SELF-EFFICACY; ADOLESCENTS; INTENTION; PARENTS; IMMUNOGENICITY; PHYSICIANS; BEHAVIORS; RECEIVE; TRIAL;
D O I：
10.1177/0193945912463267
中图分类号：
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号：
1011 ;
摘要：
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Shared Decision-Making Inventory-Revised (SDMI-R) to measure four constructs (knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, and intent) theoretically defined as vital in discussing the human papillomavirus (HPV) disease and vaccine with clients. The SDMI-R was distributed to a sample (N = 1,525) of school nurses. Correlational matrixes denoted moderate to strong correlations, indicating adequate internal reliability. Reliability for the total instrument was satisfactory ( = .874) along with Attitude, Self-Efficacy and Intent subscales .828, .917, .891, respectively. Exploratory factor analysis revealed five components that explained 75.96% of the variance.
引用
收藏
页码：193 / 213
页数：21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Nursing Decision-Making Instrument Into European Portuguese
    Paiva, Ivo Cristiano Soares
    Neves, Teresa Margarida Almeida
    Ventura, Filipa Isabel Quaresma Santos
    Vilela, Antonio Carlos Lopes
    Moreira, Isabel Maria Pinheiro Borges
    [J]. SAGE OPEN NURSING, 2024, 10
  • [2] The Corrective Feedback Instrument-Revised
    Hulse-Killacky, Diana
    Orr, Jonathan J.
    Paradise, Louis V.
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR SPECIALISTS IN GROUP WORK, 2006, 31 (03): : 263 - 281
  • [3] Translation and adaptation of Shared Care Instrument-Revised for the older adults and their caregivers in Taiwan
    Wu, Mei-Hui
    Lee, Tzu-Chi
    Lin, Shu-Yuan
    Chen, Ching-Huey
    Chen, Ching-Min
    Chou, Fan-Hao
    [J]. APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2024, 76
  • [4] Shared Decision-Making Is Not Patient Decision-Making
    Birnbrich, Alysa
    McCulloch, Patrick C.
    Kraeutler, Matthew J.
    [J]. SPORTS HEALTH-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, 2023, 15 (04): : 615 - 616
  • [5] Will older persons and their clinicians use a shared decision-making instrument?
    Naik, AD
    Schulman-Green, D
    McCorkle, R
    Bradley, EH
    Bogardus, ST
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 20 (07) : 640 - 643
  • [6] Will older persons and their clinicians use a shared decision-making instrument?
    Aanand D. Naik
    Dena Schulman-Green
    Ruth McCorkle
    Elizabeth H. Bradley
    Sidney T. Bogardus
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2005, 20 : 640 - 643
  • [7] Evaluation of a shared decision-making process in MS
    Alvarez-Rodriguez, E.
    Aguado-Valcarcel, M.
    Martinez Herves, H.
    Sanchez-Franco, C.
    Gonzalez-Suarez, I.
    [J]. MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2019, 25 : 800 - 801
  • [8] Shared decision-making
    Dirksen-Fischer, M
    [J]. GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2004, 66 (05) : 318 - 318
  • [9] Shared decision-making
    Steven, K
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2001, 51 (462): : 61 - 62
  • [10] Decision-making theories and career assessment: A psychometric evaluation of the decision making inventory
    Hardin, EE
    Leong, FTL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CAREER ASSESSMENT, 2004, 12 (01) : 51 - 64
12345